Written by Jon Fleetwood
The World Health Organization (WHO) has demanded that governments surveil online information that questions the legitimacy of influenza vaccines and that they launch “countermeasures” against those who question the WHO’s vaccine dogma, in a November Vaccines journal publication.
The WHO’s largest funders are the U.S. government (taxpayers) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
In the November publication, the WHO representatives do not argue for their beliefs in vaccines.
They do not attempt to interact with arguments against vaccines.
Instead, they call for governments to use artificial intelligence (AI) to monitor online opposition to injectable pharmaceuticals, and to develop ways to combat such opposition.
There is no persuasion, only doctrine.
The WHO paper reads:
“Vaccine effectiveness is contingent on public acceptance, making risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) an integral component of preparedness. The research agenda calls for the design of tailored communication strategies that address local sociocultural contexts, linguistic diversity, and trust dynamics.”
“Digital epidemiology tools, such as AI-driven infodemic monitoring systems like VaccineLies and CoVaxLies, offer real-time insight into misinformation trends, enabling proactive countermeasures.”
The WHO starts from the assumption that all vaccine skepticism is inherently false, pushing surveillance tools to track and catalog online dissent from those rejecting that creed.
The goal is not finding middle ground or even fostering dialogue.
It’s increasing vaccinations.
“The engagement of high-exposure occupational groups as trusted messengers is recommended to improve uptake.”
To accomplish this, governments “should” align “all” their messaging with the WHO’s denomination of vaccine faith.
All messaging should align with WHO’s six communication principles, ensuring information is Accessible, Actionable, Credible, Relevant, Timely, and Understandable, to strengthen public trust in vaccination programmes.”
The WHO’s faith system requires not only that its own followers but also non-followers inject themselves with drugs linked to injuries, diseases, hospitalizations, and deaths.
If your posts online oppose that faith system, they are targeted and labeled as “misinformation.”
You require “behavioural intervention.”
You must be “counter[ed].”
“Beyond monitoring misinformation, participatory communication models that involve local leaders, healthcare workers, and veterinarians have shown measurable improvements in vaccine uptake and trust. Evidence-based behavioural interventions can complement these approaches to counter misinformation.”
The WHO is outlining an Orwellian control system where dissent is pathologized, belief is enforced by surveillance, and governments are instructed to algorithmically police thought in service of pharmaceutical compliance.
You can bet all our parliament leaders will be right behind this edict from their masters. Seymour will be lapping up this shit like the lapdog he is.
Morning, watched Duncan Garner’s interview with Christine Rankin.
She had nothing nice to say about his attitude towards her.
It’s shows how shallow he is
The cult of WHO demands compliance or be treated as a religious heretic. We refuse to drink their Kool-Aid.
Love the cat meme.
Wrong thread for you two above.
Hello, N Z government, when are you sending me to camp runamuck?
Will trashley be camp commander?
“You must love Big Brother. It is not enough to obey him: you must love him.”
1984
Bit like God.
FUCK the WHO
….”The World Health Organization (WHO) has demanded that governments surveil online information that questions the legitimacy of influenza vaccines and that they launch “countermeasures” against those who question the WHO’s vaccine dogma”……
Since some of YSBs contributors are known to, on occasions, ignore the requirements to act like sheep & roll up our sleeves to accept Big Pharma’s untested, money making vaccine de jour we may well find ourselves on “the list”.
Rather than face traditional grilling, threats, incarceration & lawfare perhaps we should take a leaf out of the instruction manuals used by those who qualify for He Aranga Ake.
At https://newsroom.co.nz/2025/04/14/inside-the-police-programme-to-prevent-terrorism-before-it-happens/ we learn that instead of interrogation, kangaroo courts or torture we would expect incentives such as “Driving lessons. Sports clubs. Gym memberships”. This would be to “disengage people from their violent extremist ideological views”.
Peaceful individual resistance will be punished with sticks. Violence & extremism will be discouraged using kid gloves & carrots.
Got it.
If it tok a veeery deep, deep dive into Jee Von Mac Skimming’s computer to find the animal porn and
child porn
a deep deep dive
coz he was one of two to maybe commissioner
and
There were pretty much ALL other senior cops were in on the cover up racket
then
how many cops are involved in watching child porn
or animal porn (either is bad, but BOTH !! ?? )
and coverups thereof
SO
it appears that there is a proliferation of cops that watch vile evil porn
on poolice computers
so projecting
it is likely 25 to 30% of cops watch evil( illegal as well as morally wrong) stuff on computers/phones /tablets/ devices
Therefore
what gives Them the right to poo lice us
and what we do on computers ?
let he without sin cast the first stone
motherfuckers .
I thought Trump was going to cut finding to the WHO. What happened to that?
The United States still funds the World Health Organization (WHO) as of January 2026, but with major changes and uncertainty.
Current Status
Key Facts
In short: Yes for 2025 (partially secured), no starting 2026 onward. Withdrawal ongoing; full exit January 23, 2026.