Trans Woman Smashes Four World Records and Wins Nine Events in Women’s Weightlifting Tournament

It’s the end of women’s sports as we know it.

For the second year runnng, transgender wrestler Mack Beggs won the Texas girls’ Class 6A 110-pound wrestling division. Beggs is in the process of transitioning from female to male and taking testosterone. Mack won the title last year too.

In October 2018 trangender Dr. Rachel McKinnon (in the middle) became the first ever transgender world champion in a womens cycling event.

In March 2017, Laurel Hubbard, a 39 year-old transgender who was born male,won her first international women’s weightlifting title in Australia breaking four national records in the process.

Last week two trans athletes won 1st and 2nd place at the Connecticut state indoor track championships.

Mary Gregory smashed four women’s weightlifting records and won nine out of nine events at a single tournament—as fresh a male-to-female transgender. But not everyone was so happy with that.

Gregory competed as a recently transgendered female at the 100% Raw Weightlifting Federation competition in Zion Crossroads, Virginia on May 27, and crushed four records in Masters world squat, open world bench press, masters world dead lift, and masters world total, Yahoo Sports reported.

She praised her victory on Instagram last Monday, and thanked the organization for its leniency as it comes to adhering to fair-play regulations.

Update

Four days after Gregory had set the four women’s world records, Gregory found out that powerlifting officials had stripped Gregory of the records.

‘100% Raw Powerlifting Federation’ president Paul Bossi issued the following statement:

It was revealed that this female lifter was actually a male in the process of becoming a transgender.

Cadbury’s owner Mondelez sees NZ business shrink 29 per cent

The local sales of Cadbury’s owner Mondelez have taken a knock following the closure of its Dunedin chocolate factory last year.

Mondelez New Zealand’s total sales fell 29 per cent to $212 million, in the year to the end of December, from $297m in 2017, according to accounts filed with the Companies Office.

About $60m of that $85m drop appeared to be the result of the loss of exports to other companies in the Mondelez group.

But the remaining $25m decline appeared to be caused by other factors which may include Kiwis reducing their spending. Mondelez did not comment on whether its sales figures might reflect a consumer backlash from the factory closure.

But Mondelez New Zealand managing director Cara Liebrock said there were “a range of factors” separate to the closure that impacted its revenues last year.

These included changes to customer inventory management and the closure of the Cadbury World attraction in Dunedin “which was unfortunately out of our control”, she said.

“Our business continues to perform strongly in New Zealand. We’re committed to investing in our Kiwi team who work closely with thousands of local retail partners to support their growth,” she said.

“We’ve increased our investment in our business in 2019 with some new team members joining the business and we’re seeing some great results across both our new products, and much loved Kiwi brands.”

A spokesman added the company continued to employ more than 100 Kiwis “and sells more confectionery – and chocolate – than anyone else in New Zealand”.

Cadbury rankled some consumers over the past several months with changes to some of its best-known product lines, such as Roses chocolates and its marshmallow Easter eggs.

This year it reduced the size of some of its “king sized” chocolate blocks by 10 per cent, to 180g.

Worldwide, chocolate sales have periodically dipped – for example in 2001 when children were reported to be preferring to spend their money on mobile phones and text messaging, and again in 2015 and 2016.

But they have since returned to a rising trend.

Speaking to a former employee of Cadbury, she said the staff are totally disillusioned at the bullshit being put out about the reason for shifting to Melbourne. Cadbury stated that the processing equipment was outdated and it was cheaper to manufacture from Melbourne than replace the equipment in Dunedin. Well it turns out that the equipment in Dunedin was taken to Melbourne, and is being used to manufacture the same products as before.

If any budding business person ever wanted to see how not to run a business, then this is a classic. You do not continually piss off your clients by changing the composition, flavour, and size of your products and expect sales to continue.


British Activist Sentenced for Denying Existence of Moderate Islam

Britain First leaders jailed over “anti-Muslim hate crimes”

MAR 7, 2018 Robert Spencer

Britain First, at least as is reported in this article, doesn’t seem to be doing or saying anything “white supremacist” other than they want Britain to be a free society that is not ruled by Sharia, which is not really a white supremacist sentiment at all. Since most Muslims in Britain today are non-white, and the British government and media tend to frame the issue of jihad terror and Islamization in exclusively racial terms, that’s “white supremacism” and “racism.”

Judge Justin Barron “said Golding and Fransen’s words and actions ‘demonstrated hostility’ towards Muslims and the Muslim faith.”

What they were really doing was calling attention to Muslim rape gangs, which have operated freely in Britain for years because police and other authorities were too afraid of being called “racist” to do anything about them. But that’s “hostility” to Islam and Muslims, and so Fransen and Golding must be imprisoned.

Barron said: “I have no doubt it was their joint intention to use the facts of the [Canterbury] case for their own political ends. It was a campaign to draw attention to the race, religion and immigrant background of the defendants.”

Yes, because these facts are being covered up on a systematic basis by British authorities. But defending Britain is not allowed in Britain today. It makes one a “far-right extremist,” on par with jihad mass murderers. And so Fransen and Golding go to prison. Britain is saved from their threat, and can continue unobstructed on its path to national suicide.

“Britain First has been noted for its extreme white supremacist and anti-Muslim stances in the past, and Fransen gained particular notoriety when racially charged videos she published on Twitter were retweeted by Donald Trump.”

They weren’t “racially charged.” They were videos of Muslims behaving violently, that were presented in a positive manner by other Muslims before Britain First ever got hold of them. Only one had a racial component: the one that was supposedly “later found to be fake.” It showed a young Muslim abusing a disabled non-Muslim boy. It was not fake. It was labeled that the perpetrator was a Muslim migrant when he was actually the son of Muslim migrants. But the Guardian won’t tell you that.

“Britain First leaders jailed over anti-Muslim hate crimes,” by Kevin Rawlinson, Guardian, March 7, 2018:

The leaders of the far-right group Britain First have been jailed for a series of hate crimes against Muslims.

The group’s leader, Paul Golding, was sentenced to 18 weeks in prison, while deputy, Jayda Fransen, was sentenced to 36 weeks on Wednesday. They had each been found guilty of religiously aggravated harassment at Folkestone magistrate’s court earlier the same day.

“These defendants were not merely exercising their right to free speech but were instead aiming religiously aggravated abuse at innocent members of the public,” the prosecutor told the court.

They were both arrested in May last year as part of an investigation into the distribution of leaflets and online videos posted during a trial at Canterbury crown court in the same month.

Three Muslim men and a teenager were convicted of rape and jailed as a result of those proceedings.

On Wednesday, the judge Justin Barron said Golding and Fransen’s words and actions “demonstrated hostility” towards Muslims and the Muslim faith.

“I have no doubt it was their joint intention to use the facts of the [Canterbury] case for their own political ends. It was a campaign to draw attention to the race, religion and immigrant background of the defendants.”

Both were convicted over an incident at a takeaway in Ramsgate, in Kent, during which Fransen banged on the windows and doors and screamed “paedophile” and “foreigner”. Two children were playing in the middle of the shop and Jamshed Khesrow, a friend of the owners, was inside.

The judge dismissed a second charge against the pair over an incident alleged to have taken place outside Canterbury crown court later that day….

Britain First has been noted for its extreme white supremacist and anti-Muslim stances in the past, and Fransen gained particular notoriety when racially charged videos she published on Twitter were retweeted by Donald Trump.

At least one was later found to be fake and the incident caused a rift between Trump and Theresa May.

No one is put on trial for negative comments about Christianity or Judaism. This unhealthy exception stigmatizes political speech and suppresses criticism of one religion.