Home Uncategorized Big Tech Leftists Are Eliminating Conservative Content on the Internet

Big Tech Leftists Are Eliminating Conservative Content on the Internet




Who could have imagined just three years ago that Facebook, Twitter, Amazon and Google would set out to eliminate free speech

In the last three years the tech giants have worked diligently and cooperatively to eliminate conservative voices online.

Conservatives dominated social media in 2016 where they were able to get the truth uncensored.  Facebook ended that in 2017 and 2018.

Around the world, people are being exposed to information that is being biased and filtered by Big Tech with no recourse. But the bigger, more immediate problem is Big Tech’s biasing of the information people see.

This is why we need to eliminate these companies from our lives. I have joined Protonmail and am slowly migrating all my personal gmail and other company account to them. I have joined Parler as my Twitter replacement. I removed myself from Facebook 2 years ago when they sold out info to some research company. I have never owned an Android phone. I am disappointed in Apple for trying to remove apps that they think support the conservative point of view. I own Mac laptops and desk top computers. There is nothing available to replace them with so am stuck with them and my iPhones.

By doing this, and exhorting others to do the same, is a small way to let these companies know that we will not take their despicable actions in trying to curb free speech lying down.

Previous articleHave Your Say
Next articleRationale behind my Posts


  1. The lefts want to rule the world. There will always be a right wing faction out there no matter what they try and do, but with National surrendering to the lefty brigade in NZ, and these world wide technology companies stopping any chance of dissension from the leftist hypocrisy speak, it will be very hard for anyone not agreeing with them to spread the word there is another way of life that’s better. If Hitler, Stalin, etc etc only knew, they could have taken over the world by using the press and their sick leftist associates aye? It is very frightening a new world order is happening. I wish I could change my search engine from google etc but this is all a step too far for my old mind.



  2. With NZ having such a small, insular society it has always been thus.

    The only real difference now is the truly evil have found a puppet to put up as figurehead that has literally no idea what it’s doing, or how much damage it’s doing.

    Truly thick allowing the evil ones carte-blanche.



    • There we disagree.

      I seriously doubt the harridan has anywhere near the smarts attributed to it.

      Observation suggests the opposite in fact.

      The harridan is exactly the politician portrayed so often in film: thick as a brick, shallow as a puddle on a bowling green and interested only in the supposed adulation of the masses. Very easily led by Sir Humphry Appleby types.

      Often those types are themselves led by the very rich and very powerful: There-in lies the problem.



  3. The UN has been planing this concept for quite a few years.
    I think urgency is before Trump’s 2020 election, and riding on the back of it is our own.

    There is no international legal definition of hate speech, and the characterization of what is ‘hateful’ is controversial and disputed.
    In the context of this document, the term hate speech is understood as any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are, in other words, based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, colour, descent, gender or other identity factor. …..

    Rather than prohibiting hate speech as such, international law prohibits the incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence (referred to here as ‘incitement’).
    Incitement is a very dangerous form of speech, because it explicitly and deliberately aims at triggering discrimination, hostility and violence, which may also lead to or include terrorism or atrocity crimes.
    Hate speech that does not reach the threshold of incitement is not something that international law requires States to prohibit.
    It is important to underline that even when not prohibited, hate speech may to be harmful. ….

    Addressing hate speech, therefore, requires a coordinated response that tackles the root causes and drivers of hate speech, ….

    Read it, only 5 pages, and note the contrary weasel words that go in to the “strategic vision” to create “stasi-hate” citizens.

    As they say “It is important to underline that even when not prohibited, hate speech may to be harmful. …. ”



Recent posts

Debt vs Autonomy

Debt vs Autonomy The unresolved conflict between Jefferson and Hamilton enables WEF hegemony. Robert W Malone MD, MS Policies and practices designed to drive either individuals or...

Get Out Of Duckduckgo

DuckDuckGo Signs Secret Deal with Bill Gates to Track Users Online DuckDuckGo has been caught colluding with Bill Gates to tracks users online while misleadingly...

Friday Fun

Recent comments

Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Debt vs Autonomy

The way we all feel about this useless government

broken clouds
6.5 ° C
11.1 °
5.7 °
96 %
75 %
10 °
16 °
16 °
18 °
16 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar