HomeHuman StupidityBIRDFLU is Coming

BIRDFLU is Coming




Here it comes: ‘BIRDFLU’ is just the disease to rig the election

Remember when “experts” dismissed the fact that Astra Zenica can cause blood clots, then admitted it.

Then they dismissed the links that Pfizer & Moderna can cause myocarditis, then admitted it.

Recommending products that can kill you & don’t prevent illnesses is murderous.


In the name of safety & the greater good. Never forget the mass hysteria fanned by media, politicians & bureaucrats. https://t.co/dhS8nwY28p

“… let’s cross to some vaccine alarmism on Sunrise”

Sunrise teases a ‘serious new side effect’ of the AstraZeneca vaccine only to be proven wrong by a GP live on air pic.twitter.com/WgcvdvGsrm

No one regrets not taking it.

Wow, what a coincidence! Another ‘deadly plandemic’


just in time for the elections! The WEF, WHO, CDC, news media, Gates, and others have been preparing us for months about the threat of ‘Disease X,’ softening up the population for Round 2 of the falsely inflated pandemic scheme for political and financial purposes. Looks like the bird flu – H1N5 – is scheduled to be Disease X. Just as was done with COVID-19, the dangers of H1N5 are being falsely inflated and exaggerated to manufacture as much fear as possible, to gain as much compliance as possible to more government restrictions and deadly lockdown and ‘vaccine’ mandates. And, millions of chickens, cows, and pigs have been slaughtered already, to ‘cull’ livestock so as to ‘halt the spread of H1N5 and protect humans.’
And more will be slaughtered for this ‘reason.’ More lies.
The slaughter of livestock has been a UN/WEF/Gates/globalist agenda for the past few years.
Purpose? To reduce supplies of meat, forcing more and more people to eat fake/lab/GMO/insect food – manufactured and sold by companies owned by Gates and other global oligarchs. How many people will fall for the lies and operation this time? How many will meekly comply as they did in Round 1?
Previous article
Next article


  1. Francis Collins’ House Testimony Released
    His shocking answers speak for themselves…

    Wenstrup Releases Former NIH Director Francis Collins’s Transcript, Highlights Key Takeaways in New Memo

    WASHINGTON — Today, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) released the transcript from Dr. Francis Collins’s transcribed interview. Dr. Collins helped lead the government’s COVID-19 pandemic response as the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) until his resignation at the end of 2021. In conjunction with the transcript, the Select Subcommittee also released a new staff memo that highlights the key takeaways from Dr. Collins’s transcribed interview. The memo can be found here.

    The full transcript can be found here. Below are important exchanges from Dr. Collins’s transcribed interview:

    The hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a lab leak or lab related accident is not a conspiracy theory. Despite previously disagreeing with the lab leak theory — both in public and in private — Dr. Collins testified that the lab leak hypothesis is indeed not a conspiracy theory.

    Majority Counsel: “All it’s calling for is a “yes” or “no.” Is the possibility of a lab leak a conspiracy theory?”

    Dr. Collins: “You have to define what you mean by a lab leak.”

    Majority Counsel: “Putting aside de novo, the possibility of a laboratory or research-related accident, a researcher doing something in a lab, getting infected with a virus, and then sparking the pandemic. Is that scenario a conspiracy theory”?

    Dr. Collins: “Not at this point.”

    Majority Counsel: “We have talked about this an awful lot, I think I know the answer to the question, but I want to ask it. Is the origin of COVID-19 still unsettled science?”

    Dr. Collins: “Yes.”

    The “6 feet apart” social distancing guidance that federal public health officials endorsed was likely not based on any science or data. Dr. Collins agreed with Dr. Fauci that he has not seen any evidence to support the “6 feet apart” directive — which was promoted by public health officials and caused widespread economic and social damage to Americans.

    Majority Counsel: “Moving on to social distancing and the various regulations surrounding that. On March 22, 2020, the CDC issued guidance describing social distancing to include remaining out congregant settings, avoiding mass gatherings, and maintaining a distance of approximately six feet from others when possible. We asked Dr. Fauci where the six feet came from and he said it kind of just appeared, is the quote. Do you recall science or evidence that supported the six-feet distance?”

    Dr. Collins: “I do not.”

    Majority Counsel: “Is that I do not recall or I do not see any evidence supporting six feet?”

    Dr. Collins: “I did not see evidence, but I’m not sure I would have been shown evidence at that point.”

    Majority Counsel: “Since then, it has been an awfully large topic. Have you seen any evidence since then supporting six feet?”

    Dr. Collins: “No.”

    NIH often lacks the necessary subject matter expertise to ensure U.S. taxpayer funds are spent safely. Concerningly, Dr. Collins was unaware of any NIH policy that ensures foreign laboratories comply with U.S. standards and are not at odds with U.S. national interests.

    Majority Counsel: “Thank you. We’ve asked a number of people regarding the vetting or certifying process of foreign labs that receive U.S. dollars. Do you know what that process is?”

    Dr. Collins: “I do not.”

    Majority Counsel: “To your knowledge, does NIH certify foreign labs that receive U.S. dollars?”

    Dr. Collins: “I don’t know that.”

    Majority Counsel: “Again, what we’re trying to figure out is if, like, you get a proposal that has a foreign lab on it, if the NIH would do all the work themselves, or if they would call the State Department, or if they would call some other department to try to determine if that foreign lab is reputable.”

    Dr. Collins: “I don’t know.”

    The Trump Administration led the charge to rightfully terminate and later suspend EcoHealth Alliance, Inc.’s grant in April 2020. Dr. Collins testified that he supported every enforcement action suggested by the Trump Administration and executed by the NIH.

    Majority Counsel: “Moving into 2020. Before we start with individual letters, we asked Dr. Lauer and he testified that he would not sign or send a letter that he disagreed with. Do you have any reason to doubt that assertion?”

    Dr. Collins: “No.”

    Majority Counsel: “Do you agree with every enforcement action the NIH took against EcoHealth?”

    Dr. Collins: “Yes.”

    Dr. Collins claims that Dr. Fauci invited him to participate in the infamous February 1, 2020 phone call that allegedly “prompted” the public narrative that COVID-19 originated from nature and that vilified the lab leak hypothesis.

    This testimony directly contradicts earlier statements made by Dr. Fauci.

    Majority Counsel: “How were you made aware of this call?”

    Dr. Collins: “I was, I think – again, it’s four years ago – initially informed by Dr. Fauci that the call was happening. And then, I think I got this email forwarded about what the agenda was going to be from Dr. Farrar, who was clearly the person organizing the call.”

    Majority Counsel: “Did Dr. Fauci ask you to join the call?”

    Dr. Collins: “Yes.”

    There we have it. Ex-director NIH Francis Collins had NO data and has not seen any data to support the social distancing edicts from HHS.

    The transcript itself documents that Director Collins had evidence that masking would harm children.

    From the transcript:

    Q: In the realm of masking, obviously masks became this big to-do during the pandemic. One of the specific aspects that we are interested in is the science and data that supported it for children. So the WHO recommended against masking children less than five because masks are, I’m quoting, not in the overall interest of the child, and against children 6 to 11 from wearing masks because of again, quoting, the potential impact of wearing a mask on learning and psychological development. The United States recommended masking kids as young as two, so directly contradicted the WHO’s recommendation on that.

    Do you recall what science or data backed up that recommendation?

    Collins: I have no knowledge of that.

    Q Okay. There are now studies coming out regarding learning loss from both school closures and childhood mask wearing — for masks specifically, kids not being able to see adults form words and things like that and it’s causing speech issues. Are you aware of those issues?

    Collins: In a general way, yes.

    Q: Do you agree that there’s learning loss and other unintended consequences of mask wearing?

    Collins: I have to depend on the experts who assess those things who have evidence, they say, that that’s the case.



Recent posts

Have Your Say

Monday Fun

Have Your Say

Recent comments

Viking on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say
Sooty on Have Your Say
Nunnas on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Pinky1 on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
Ross12 on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
light rain
14.4 ° C
14.4 °
14.1 °
91 %
100 %
15 °
18 °
15 °
12 °
13 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar