Home Climate Change Bullshit Climate change that ignores history

Climate change that ignores history

Author

Date

Category

Natural News Reports

Climate has ALWAYS changed from decade to decade.  There were major swings (volatility) during the 1930s. You had the dust bowl during the summer and in 1936 you had record cold. The 1936 North American cold wave, which also hit Japan and China, still rank among the most intense cold waves in the recorded history of North America. You cannot blame this on soccer moms driving the kids around town burning fossil fuels. Cars were a luxury in the 1930s still.

There is just no evidence of human-induced climate change. There is nobody willing to call them out on this nonsense with just showing the dramatic swings in temperature over the centuries.

Here is a piece that appeared in the Weekend Australian on the covert issues behind the curtain..

It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 per cent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error. It’s not surprising.

We have been subjected to extravagance from climate catastrophists for close to 50 years.

In January 1970, Life magazine, based on “solid scientific evidence”, claimed that by 1985 air pollution would reduce the sunlight reaching the Earth by half. In fact, across that period sunlight fell by between 3 per cent and 5 per cent. In a 1971 speech, Paul Ehrlich said: “If I were a gambler I would take even money that ­England will not exist in the year 2000.”

Fast forward to March 2000 and David Viner, senior research scientist at the Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, told The Independent, “Snowfalls are now a thing of the past.” In December 2010, the Mail Online reported, “Coldest December since records began as temperatures plummet to minus 10C bringing travel chaos across Britain”.

We’ve had our own busted predictions. Perhaps the most preposterous was climate alarmist Tim Flannery’s 2005 observation: “If the computer records are right, these drought conditions will become permanent in eastern Australia.” Subsequent rainfall and severe flooding have shown the records or his analysis are wrong. We’ve swallowed dud prediction after dud prediction. What’s more, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which we were instructed was the gold standard on global warming, has been exposed repeatedly for ­mis­rep­resentation and shoddy methods.

Weather bureaus appear to have “homogenised” data to suit narratives. NASA’s claim that 2014 was the warmest year on record was revised, after challenge, to only 38 per cent probability. Extreme weather events, once blamed on global warming, no longer are, as their frequency and intensity decline.

Why then, with such little evidence, does the UN insist the world spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year on futile climate change policies? Perhaps Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN’s Framework on Climate Change has the answer?

Previous articleHave Your Say
Next articleComing Our Way Again Soon?

6 COMMENTS

  1. Issue for me is how did we get to the point where our sovereignty is compromised to the point the UN can “insist” on anything or seemingly create an obligation on this countries citizens to do anything. Paying to a fund for wealth distribution by the UN is not a reasonable obligation on this or any country.

    Politicians who got us to this point where an obligation is assumed have let us down. Ego by elected leadership has failed in my observation.

    0

    0

  2. This (rather long) documentary by British television producer Martin Durkin, which argues against the virtually unchallenged consensus that global warming is man-made, was broadcast in March 2007. It challenges the climate extremism and well worth taking the time to watch.
    “The Great Global Warming Swindle debunks the myths, and exposes what may well prove to be the darkest chapter in the history of mankind. According to a group of leading scientists brought together by documentary maker Martin Durkin everything you’ve ever been told about global warming is probably untrue. Just as we’ve begun to take it for granted that climate change is a man-made phenomenon, Durkin’s documentary slays the whole premise of global warming.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYhCQv5tNsQ

    0

    0

  3. My question is how can we reverse this climate change hysteria and get back to normal life?
    Just being eco friendly
    (And cutting back the overpopulated locust counties of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Uganda etc.)

    0

    0

Recent posts

Xi Jinping’s Seven Misjudgments

Xi Jinping’s Seven Misjudgments Ngan Shunkau All of the problems that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is facing today come from fundamental structural factors that can’t...

Highest Incidence Of Chinese Virus

The Most “Vaxxed” Countries Have Highest Incidence Of Chinese Virus By Peter Koenig and Zero Hedge There is now statistical evidence that the higher the rate of mRNA-inoculations in a country,...

Imperfect Climate Scientists

Imperfect Climate Scientists Posted oby Ron Clutz There’s a problem with writing about science — any science — which is that scientists are human like the rest of us....

COVID Deaths in Sweden Hit Zero

Daily COVID Deaths in Sweden Hit Zero, as Other Nations Brace for More Lockdowns Sweden isn't in the news much these days. There's a reason...

Recent comments

Viking on Have Your Say
Odakyu-sen on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
Braybots nemesis on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Braybots nemesis on Have Your Say
I am a stupid boy on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

Hamilton
light rain
9.7 ° C
10.9 °
8.4 °
92 %
0.5kmh
100 %
Thu
10 °
Fri
16 °
Sat
16 °
Sun
17 °
Mon
15 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.4334
EUR
1.6997
AUD
1.0587
CAD
1.1480
GBP
1.9971
JPY
0.0131
CNY
0.2215
INR
0.0193