HomeFinanceKiwisaver Fraud?

Kiwisaver Fraud?




  1. How New Zealanders miss out on hundreds of thousands in retirement savings

Ayesha Scott Senior Lecturer – Finance, Auckland University of Technology

In the 12 years since New Zealand introduced the retirement fund KiwiSaver, nearly three million New Zealanders have enrolled and 30 KiwiSaver providers are now collectively managing NZ$57 billion in investments.

But questions are being asked about whether KiwiSaver members pay too much. A recent report commissioned by the Financial Markets Authority shows that New Zealand funds charge on average 25% to 50% more than equivalent UK funds.

In the year to Sept 2019, fund providers earned NZ$479.8 million in fees, with each member charged an average of NZ$132 per year.

Our research explores the gap between initial expectations and reality, and shows that New Zealanders miss out on tens, and in some cases hundreds, of thousands in retirement savings.

Impact of fees on savings

The New Zealand government introduced KiwiSaver in 2007 to address a lack of retirement savings. The savings scheme takes employee and employer contributions and gives them to a private fund manager to invest. Members can either choose a fund manager or are assigned one at random. The government also makes a contribution, which we included in our calculations, but note that not everyone is receiving what they are entitled to.

Managing a fund costs money, and with nearly NZ$57 billion invested, New Zealanders have paid NZ$479.8 million in fees to fund managers. Fees are often quoted to members in a way that makes them appear deceptively small.

For instance, the average KiwiSaver growth fund will cost 1.25% per year. The equivalent UK fund would likely cost around 0.92%. To many New Zealanders, this difference may sound inconsequential, which has motivated a recent move to quote fees as dollar amounts on annual statements.

Fees are a double-edged sword. They erode retirement savings by reducing monthly contributions and the future compounding of those savings. The result is tens of thousands less in retirement.

For example, a 25-year-old member in the average growth fund with an income of NZ$50k is likely to pay NZ$50k in fees over the life of their KiwiSaver. They will retire with about NZ$255k in savings. In contrast, the cheapest growth fund would charge just under NZ$15k in fees over the same period, and would result in over NZ$300k in savings at retirement.

Economies of scale

While policymakers debate whether New Zealanders pay too much, research looks at economies of scale. When the government established KiwiSaver, policymakers thought the high fees KiwiSaver providers were charging would reduce as more people invested.

They expected that as funds increased in size, the costs of running them would be spread over larger pools of funds and it would become cheaper to manage the investments. These cost savings would then be passed on to members.

We collected data on the total fees charged by KiwiSaver providers along with the assets under management and the number of members a fund has. Our project included 24 fund providers and over 267 individual funds (across five risk groups) between 2013 and 2018.

If there are economies of scale present, then as a fund gets larger, either by increasing the amount of money or by increasing the number of members, the fees should increase by a less than proportional amount. Put differently, a 1% increase in size should result in a less than 1% increase in fees

But this is not the case. When we consider the amount of money invested, a 1% increase in the assets under management results in about a 1% increase in fees. In other words, as the total sum invested in KiwiSaver increases, we can expect total fees to increase at the same rate. This means KiwiSaver providers are either not seeing any cost savings at all as they get bigger or are refusing to pass these savings onto investors.

When we consider the number of members in a fund as the measure of size we see some evidence of economies of scale. A 1% increase in members results in a 0.93% increase in fees, a small reduction in the fees.

Unfortunately, large increases in KiwiSaver members are unlikely. KiwiSaver already has over 80% of eligible New Zealanders enrolled. In 2019, the number of members grew by 3% across all funds. Future economies of scale won’t be large.

The expected cost savings have not materialised and seem unlikely to. The total amount of KiwiSaver fees providers collect looks set to continue to increase at a steady rate. For members, the consequence will be expensive funds (compared with their peers in other countries) and far less in retirement savings come age 65


  1. Well, yeah, but I’m happy with my managed fund which has done exceedingly well, so I have too!
    Not everyone has the confidence or knowledge of the financial market to invest confidently themselves, and KiwiSaver gives many savings they probably wouldn’t have had otherwise.



    • Focus on results not the fees.
      The now well known as a dick, Field Marshall Lord Saint Gareth Morgan, said he would have low fees and he did along with poor performance.
      I went with Tower initially- threw a dart at a wall- and that was sold to Carmel Fisher who was totally useless.

      I dont know what the fees were but the performance was hopeless. In her profile – she inherited thousands at age 21 and blew it on a holiday and hair and nails or some goneburger stuff- not someone to be a money manager.

      I transferred to Milford and they are excellent.
      Again, i don’t know what the fees are. It is about performance.
      I did not stop the stupid waffly newsletters at Fisher until the incompetent fool Fisher started doing anti Trump shite in her mindless ramblings. Jeez!

      Kiwisaver was never a good scheme and the savings rate is too low.
      If you need to bribe people it is probably not that good.
      I already had my savings plan in place and it was the $1000 kickstart and $1000 pa matching that was the appeal.
      A bribe with taxpayers money.
      Now it is nothing to get excited about. $500 matching pa
      Eg For nephew 7 years ago I opened an acct.
      The more recent one it is not worth it. There is no kickstart.and the money is locked in for near 70 years.
      There are other options.

      Most funds are free fees to under 18s.

      For those blind Notional supporters here is a chance to downtick me.
      Notional introduced a tax on the employer for the employers compulsory contribution.
      Nice one Johnboy. Yes to new taxes!



Recent posts

The Logic Of Law

Have Your Say

Thursday Fun

Have Your Say

Climate Change

Recent comments

Curious on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Saggy on Have Your Say
Saggy on Have Your Say
Tarquin on Have Your Say
Curious on Have Your Say
Curious on Have Your Say
freethinker on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
overcast clouds
20 ° C
20.6 °
18.5 °
77 %
100 %
20 °
15 °
19 °
19 °
19 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar