NEW Zealanders are trying to digest the shocking reality of the Luxon government’s Gene Technology Bill which introduces sweeping changes to the governance of gene technologies and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
The Bill proposes shockingly harsh and draconian penalties against anyone who makes a statement or gives information in relation to the Bill that they “know to be false or misleading in a material particular”, faces up to five years in prison or a fine of $200,000. Corporate entities can be fined up to a million dollars.
The draconian penalties are obviously designed to dissuade and stifle criticism of genetically modified medicines and food which are highly unpopular among the population and especially since the scandalous rollout of mRNA gene therapy injections, falsely called vaccines.
The Bill also coincides with a global drive by the World Health Organisation to push certain “recommended” “health products” including medicines, vaccines, medical devices, “assistive products”, cell and gene-based therapies and other products under its so-called International Health Regulations.
But in its amended regulations, the WHO has removed the word “non-binding” in regard to so-called health recommendations it had previously detailed.
US biology professor Brett Weinstein says the IHRs are a direct threat to the right to informed consent to medical treatment because the WHO apparently wants to be able to mandate the “uploading” of genetic information to individuals’ immune systems.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, leader of the faux conservative, WEF-influenced National Party, appears to have caved in to lobbying by big GMO businesses that seek to dominate the global food supply with mass-produced fake meat and other products dressed up to look like real food.
Luxon and Nationals already have a locally-based organisation called Plant and Food Research to push “innovations” in the food industry, such as “fake fish” and “cultivated (fake) chicken”.
Many Kiwi doctors and scientists alike are alarmed that Luxon’s Bill threatens the safety and integrity of the country’s medicine and food systems. They are also gravely concerned that the science supporting the safety of GMOs remains incomplete and in its infancy.
And then there are the frankenstein mRNA medicines currently being pushed by none other than the
WHO and Klaus Schwab himself, who recently came out proposing four times annual AI-generated mRNA injections for the entire planet.
Luxon’s GMO protection Bill sounds like it came straight out of Pfizer scumbag CEO Albert Bourla’s latest offering to the WEF – a spiel on new technology that “is advancing at a head-spinning pace and scale, bringing us unprecedented opportunities. In fact, artificial intelligence (AI) is already accelerating the discovery and design of potential drug candidates.”
Bourla, the profiteer of murder by mRNA injection, is drooling at the thought of a whole new range of rapidly generated “vaccines” and other drugs being rolled out on a global scale like never before – even more products at a faster rate than the notorious Operation Warp Speed.
And who is Christopher Luxon to defy Bourla and company, who see New Zealand as just another customer whose pockets they can rifle with their greedy and grubby little hands? “She’s all good Albert. Way you go. And how high would you like me to jump,” says Luxon.
“And yes Alby, we’ll deal severely with those Kiwis who dare criticise your AI/GMO medicines.”
https://nzdsos.com/2025/01/15/deadline-speak-out-against-the-nz-gene-technology-bill
5 YEARS JAIL OR A $1MILLION FINE FOR DISINFO-MISINFO… THERE GOES EVEN OUR ABILITY TO SPEAK OR POST ABOUT THIS… FOREVER… FREE SPEECH GONE
$100,000 TO $500,000 FOR REFUSING TO GO ALONG WITH MEDICAL MANDATES SO YOU WILL BE FORCE JABBED OR FACE BANKRUPTCY
no thought to actually include the exact wording of the clause? or id this one of those exagerated claims by a bunch of nutters just to get other loopy nutters onboard????
most likely the later, if it cant be put on here or easily found in the link then its likely a bunch of bullshit. who the fuck has the time and want to sift through and submit on shit like this that theres absolutely zero chance of changing.
just sit down, shut the fuck up and eat your cornflake tentacles.
Here you go SB this is the applicable clause in the bill. It will take you about 30 seconds to read even if you are a slow reader. Spread “misinformation” at your peril.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2024/0110/7.0/LMS1009981.html
explain who thats applicable to????
everyone?
anti gmo folk?
gmo folk/ businesses selling gmo products?
that lacks context, is there other pieces of the puzzle that go with it, as nasska says it could apply to safe and effective in its current form.
If it’s not clear best best to assume it applies to everyone including posts on this blog. Would you want to have to argue it in court? Personally I would have thought that this is pretty clear. “Strict liability offence
(5)
A person commits an offence if the person, makes a statement or gives information for the purposes of this Act that is false or misleading in a material particular.
(6)
The person is liable on conviction,—
(a)
in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $50,000; or
(b)
otherwise, to a fine not exceeding $250,000.
As written “false or misleading information” is merely anything disagreeing with the manufacturer’s advertising.
“Safe & effective” anyone?
This is a prelude to mass poisoning done legally!
Where is JC today to ask probing questions on the government’s plans for mandatory GMO?????
https://www.nzonscreen.com/title/3-news-corngate-interview-with-helen-clark-2002
3 News – ‘Corngate’ interview with Helen Clark
On 9 July 2002 the ruling Labour Party was under pressure on the Genetic Engineering (GE) issue, when John Campbell confronted Prime Minister Helen Clark over the suspected release of GE corn seed in 2000. In a 3 News special, a fired-up Campbell, informed by Nicky Hager’s yet-to-be-published book Seeds of Distrust, alleged there had been a cover-up. Upset at what she perceived as an ambush, Clark reacted tersely; she later labelled Campbell a “sanctimonious little creep”. With a general election looming, the encounter was dubbed ‘Corngate’.
I’M ‘OFFENDED’ AND WANT QUESTIONS ASKED