HomeUncategorisedMore Greens Bullshit

More Greens Bullshit




NPR Admits Plastic Bag Bans Pointless, Paper & Cloth Totes Worse For Environment

As the enviro-wackos continue down the doom-and-gloom tropes, and cities move to ban plastic bags, even NPR concedes that these bags aren’t nearly as damaging to the environment as the greenies would have us believe. What’s more is that the alternatives that the greenies promote, paper bags and reusable cloth totes, may be even more harmful to the planet.

University of Sydney economist Rebecca Taylor started studying bag regulations because it seemed as though every time she moved for a new job — from Washington, D.C., to California to Australia — bag restrictions were implemented shortly after. “Yeah, these policies might be following me,” she jokes. Taylor recently published a study of bag regulations in California. It’s a classic tale of unintended consequences.

Before California banned plastic shopping bags statewide in late 2016, a wave of 139 California counties implemented the policy themselves. Taylor and colleagues compared bag use in cities with bans with those without them. For six months, they spent weekends in grocery stores tallying the types of bags people carried out (she admits these weren’t her wildest weekends). She also analyzed these stores’ sales data

Taylor found these bag bans did what they were supposed to: People in the cities with the bans used fewer plastic bags, which led to about 40 million fewer pounds of plastic trash per year. But people who used to reuse their shopping bags for other purposes, like picking up dog poop or lining trash bins, still needed bags. “What I found was that sales of garbage bags actually skyrocketed after plastic grocery bags were banned,” she says. This was particularly the case for small, 4-gallon bags, which saw a 120 percent increase in sales after bans went into effect.

Trash bags are thick and use more plastic than typical shopping bags. “So about 30 percent of the plastic that was eliminated by the ban comes back in the form of thicker garbage bags,” Taylor says. On top of that, cities that banned plastic bags saw a surge in the use of paper bags, which she estimates resulted in about 80 million pounds of extra paper trash per year.

Plastic haters, it’s time to brace yourselves. A bunch of studies find that paper bags are actually worse for the environment. They require cutting down and processing trees, which involves lots of water, toxic chemicals, fuel and heavy machinery. While paper is biodegradable and avoids some of the problems of plastic, Taylor says, the huge increase of paper, together with the uptick in plastic trash bags, means banning plastic shopping bags increases greenhouse gas emissions. That said, these bans do reduce nonbiodegradable litter.

What about reusable cloth bags? We know die-hard public radio fans love them! They’ve got to be great, right?

Nope. They can be even worse.

A 2011 study by the U.K. government found a person would have to reuse a cotton tote bag 131 times before it was better for climate change than using a plastic grocery bag once. The Danish government recently did a study that took into account environmental impacts beyond simply greenhouse gas emissions, including water use, damage to ecosystems and air pollution. These factors make cloth bags even worse. They estimate you would have to use an organic cotton bag 20,000 times more than a plastic grocery bag to make using it better for the environment.

The most environment-friendly way to carry groceries is to use the same bag over and over again. According to the Danish study, the best reusable ones are made from polyester or plastics like polypropylene. Those still have to be used dozens and dozens of times to be greener than plastic grocery bags, which have the smallest carbon footprint for a single use.

As for bag policies, Taylor says a fee is smarter than a ban. She has a second paper showing a small fee for bags is just as effective as a ban when it comes to encouraging use of reusable bags. But a fee offers flexibility for people who reuse plastic bags for garbage disposal or dog walking.

This is par for the course for environmentalists, whose knee jerk reactions often end up creating policies that do more damage to the planet than what they wanted banned.

Previous article
Next article


  1. To environmentalists, it’s not about the facts, it’s about the “feelz”.

    Besides, their mentors from the Soviet Union mastered that side of the argument: use emotional appeal and not factual ones.



  2. I live in the country, so am unlikely to encounter these f*ckwits in person. Did you see on the news the Gang of Idiots trying to block traffic? Heathrow? Grrr! I know London cops don’t have guns, but surely nightsticks? Let the beatings begin.



  3. Often the mindset is better displayed in the hand made placards. One seen in recent protest across the world was “Save The Planet – Stop The Warming”. Like everything else they seem to think it is all instantaneous. Like the recent environmental report for the mystical land of Aotearoa which spell check offers “tearoom” for? Lets do This. Lol



  4. Plastic bag bans- whatever. I still seem to have a million of them around the place lol.
    Now i would ask one question nobody in the NZ or US media seems to have asked before, when it comes to their obsession with this climate change nonsense. For example the “New green deal”- do you support the Govt confiscating thousands of private utility companies, farms, and businesses you deem to be polluters and deniers? If yes, how will a Govt achieve that kind of power? What about Kiwis who own 49% of NZ power company shares? We are all going to burn in 11 years- how many of those years do you think would be tied up in courts? You know, just maybe those business owners and investors might fight back with armies of lawyers?

    A placard saying “Global warming isn’t cool” in the hand of a 13-year old will probably do the trick lol.



  5. Questions I have wanted to ask but not sure to whom.

    How much of the recycling trash picked up from the roadside actually gets recycled?
    Of what is, is it efficiently re-purposed or just traded to offshore businesses for processing?
    Why aren’t we seeing plastic houses being made as affordable dwellings instead of hotels?

    How have the recycling figures improved during this concerning COL government?

    No point banning bags without dealing with the existing plastic or was this just the chance to allow me to mutter “Gunts!” every week as we head to the shops

    “Don’t forget the bags”… “How could I dear?”



  6. We just came back from a week in Bangkok. No ban in NZ will make a significant impact. A city with 8 million people, air pollution so thick you can carve and serve it and who use plastic bags to serve drinks.

    We should, instead, focus on designing technology solutions, alternative uses, etc and be a world leader that way rather than pretending our 0.06% of world population is going to impact much.



Recent posts

Tuesday Fun

Have Your Say

Mad Bill Doesn’t Like Memes

Have Your Say

Recent comments

Starving Artist on Have Your Say
The Ancient Hooligan on Have Your Say
Brian Marshall on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Tarquin on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Editor on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
overcast clouds
19.4 ° C
19.4 °
18.5 °
92 %
100 %
19 °
23 °
25 °
27 °
25 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar