HomeFreedom of SpeechNew Law That Will Kill Free Speech & Democracy

New Law That Will Kill Free Speech & Democracy




Australia Introduces New Law That Will Kill Free Speech & Democracy

The Australian Government recently introduced a new law proposal to ban officially unapproved online content.

If the Misinformation and Disinformation Bill is enacted, then the free expression of ideas will be basically outlawed.

Digital companies will be expected to adopt a code of conduct which will see them censor speech based on broad, vague and far-reaching directives.

RT reports: The Communications Legislation Amendment (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023 foreshadows the imposition of a legal obligation on digital platforms to police alleged ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’. If that does not work, the law proposal provides for the full empowerment of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to directly intervene for the purpose of preventing ‘harm’.

Section 2 of the proposed legislation defines ‘harm’ as follows:

  • (a) hatred against a group in Australian society on the basis of ethnicity, nationality, race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion or physical or mental disability;
  • (b) disruption of public order or society in Australia;
  • (c) harm to the integrity of Australian democratic processes or of Commonwealth, State, Territory or local government institutions;
  • (d) harm to the health of Australians;
  • (e) harm to the Australian environment;
  • (f) economic or financial harm to Australians, the Australian economy or a sector of the Australian economy.

The concept of ‘harm’ peddled by the bill is illusory, and its content would be subjectively determined by a powerful government agency. The definition of what is and what isn’t harm is malleable and can expand and contract depending on ACMA’s prevailing views. Ultimately, any type of speech with which the government is uncomfortable could be deemed ‘harmful’. For example, describing “disrupting social order” as serious harm could be interpreted to stop the organization of legitimate political protests. This could certainly be used to suppress legitimate political speech that should be part of a functioning democracy.

Above all, ACMA would gain sweeping powers to require any person to appear at a time and place of its choosing to answer questions about misinformation or disinformation. These powers include infringement notices, remedial directions, injunctions and civil penalties, including fines of up to AU$550,000 (US$358,000) for individuals and AU$2.75 million for corporations. Criminal penalties, including imprisonment, may also apply in cases of alleged “extreme harm.”

The provisions found in this law proposal put the communications and lives of free-thinkers, human rights defenders, independent journalists, and ordinary citizens under constant risk. They go in direct opposition to international human rights experts’ advice that “general prohibitions on the dissemination of information based on vague and ambiguous ideas, including ‘false news’ or ‘non-objective information’, are incompatible with international standards for restrictions on freedom of expression… and should be abolished.”

It is noteworthy that the Australian Government is exempted from the proposed legislation. Hence, the content issued by the government is never to be considered ‘misinformation’ but criticisms of the government by ordinary citizens can. It is certainly ironic that views incompatible with the government’s preferred narrative could be deemed to ‘harm’ the integrity of Australia’s democracy since it would disallow speech and expressive conduct that is integral to the maintenance of democratic processes.

In its 12-page submission to the Law Council, the Victorian Bar Association explains that this proposed legislation effectively creates an “unlevel playing field between governments and other speakers” that disadvantages government critics in comparison to government supporters. “The bill’s interference with the self-fulfillment of free expression will occur primarily by the chilling self-censorship it will inevitably bring about in the individual users of the relevant services,” says the Victorian Bar.

Above all, ACMA’s enforcement of the proposed legislation will inevitably stymie discussion of controversial topics, especially if they involve criticism of government policy and actions. This scenario is likely to unfold when the impugned speech is incompatible with the government’s official narrative. Thus, the proposed legislation targets those who, merely exercising their right to free speech, critically assess the desirability of government decisions and actions.

Other concerns with the proposed ‘misinformation’ legislation include the possibility of suspending the activities of internet companies in Australia if they fail to comply with the obligations created, as well as increased criminal penalties for libel and defamation which are incompatible with international human rights standards.

As can be seen, the proposed legislation constitutes a serious attack on the democratic right of Australians to free speech. Digital platforms will be legally obliged to police commentators’ discussion of controversial topics. Under this ‘misinformation’ legislation, any honest and robust debate about government policies will be effectively outlawed.

To conclude, our freedom of political communication is under attack in Australia. If the Misinformation and Disinformation Bill is enacted, then the free expression of ideas will be basically outlawed by the Australian Government. In short, the enactment of this law proposal will spell the end of authentic democracy in Australia. Australians are basically witnessing the transformation of their system of representative government into nothing more than a less open, or more disguised, form of elective dictatorship.

We need to remain vigilant to ensure this type of law doesn’t creep by stealth across the Tasman
Previous article
Next article


  1. Once again I’ll repeat myself, the massive facility being built right now at the high security whenuapai airforce base is the pig Arderns donation to an international effort being supported by Microsoft in this country, and in Australia, in fact the Aussies have just recently taken up the Microsoft offer which was to be expected when the people of that country voted for a clown circus labour party.



  2. Yeah. There’s a right wing blog , in new Zealand, that sees fit to cancel and not listen anymore to anyone that has the temerity to point out their shortcomings.
    The bfd has become another outpost that I hoped would be a haven for conservatives and the like minded.
    No. They’ve become a site, like stuff, that although not guilty of taking the cash,have become completely wrapped up in themselves and will not tolerate any dissension towards their ideals by way of email of any other discourse.
    And they hold their hand our for money, and censor people, like minded people and automatically expect a donation.
    Get fucked.
    You can’t even email them on their website anymore to discuss
    It seems a once proud site , like the bfd, has fallen victim to the same parasitic behavior exhibited by the main stream media.
    Do as I say, think as I say, do as I do, or you’re banned. Fair enough. I got banned for epithets.
    Fair dos. But don’t expect automatic support from conservatives when far more free and superior sites , like brash basset and Hyde, and most importantly, ysb are available to all that want to be able to express their opinions, without fear nor favor, use their own available vernacular without fear of being banned of shafted,
    To the bfd??? Answer emails you are afraid of confronting re your own main stream media like behavior, grow the fuck up and listen to the rest of conservative new Zealand , and not behave in a manner unbecoming a so called journalistic paradise of free speech.
    You have the begging bowl out.
    Well. Think long and hard before you ask the banned and deemed below yourselves as worthy commentators to even entertain the idea of a subscription worthwhile.
    It matters not anymore, to me.
    Like I’ve said before about the main stream media, remain relevant or not.
    Your choice.
    Aaron Shanahan



Recent posts

Have Your Say

Monday Fun

Have Your Say

Recent comments

Viking on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say
Sooty on Have Your Say
Nunnas on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Pinky1 on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
Ross12 on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
light rain
14.4 ° C
14.4 °
14.1 °
91 %
100 %
15 °
18 °
15 °
12 °
13 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar