Home NZ Politics Nude Nut Backs Co-governance

Nude Nut Backs Co-governance




Luxon backs co-governance debate, shies from a referendum


National’s leader Christopher Luxon has said no to a referendum on co-governance – for now – something likely coalition partner ACT has said is a bottom-line.

However, he left the door slightly ajar – saying he has “serious reservations” about co-governance in public service delivery and the government needs to make its case.

Luxon this morning was questioned several times about what National would do. In the end, he rejected the suggestion National could go either way.

“I’m focused on what the National Party thinks … there’ll be a time for us to think about coalition partners down the road but right here, right now, I’m very happy to have that conversation about co-governance but let’s have it in an intelligent way, a mature way, rather than kneejerking and jumping to sort of stereotypes as to what that is.”

“I appreciate he’s got a view about what he might want to do with his party and a referendum … no. I don’t see a need for a referendum at this point, if you ask me that question.”

That was in reference to ACT leader David Seymour, who was accused of race baiting last week after launching a petition for the referendum, saying Labour was “trying to make an unequal society on purpose” with different political rights and duties for Māori.

He said the government was seeking to create division by implementing co-governance, citing the three waters and health reforms, and the He Puapua report.

Māori Party co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer however said Seymour was simply politicking and being disingenuous.

“It’s a real slight when we see politicians not only try to wipe away history, but wipe away the uniqueness of tangata whenua. This isn’t a debate that should be had in 2022 … but it is again, sadly.

It’s disappointing but it’s not surprising that we see David almost step into the little Don Brash Jr shoes … it shows David’s ignorance that Te Tiriti is about mana motuhake and tino rangatiratanga. It is about, in fact, Māori being able to assert their own self-determination, how they manage their marae, how we manage our issues.”

Luxon suggested however that the government was pushing ahead with a different kind of co-governance than New Zealand was familiar with.

“The government’s gone down a pathway, it hasn’t been transparent, it hasn’t been honest, it hasn’t gone on and made the case, it hasn’t tried to spend its political capital to tell New Zealanders as to where it’s going.

“I look at that issue and I go ‘well co-governance historically – or co-management in previous National Party governments – has been really around local iwi working with local government and central government on the management of local and natural resources. But what we’re now talking about is co-governance happening within the sphere of public services.

“If it is genuinely about co-governance of the delivery of public services, that’s something that I feel uncomfortable with.”

National’s view of the Māori Health Authority, for instance, was it would not lead to better outcomes, he said.

“We personally believe that we don’t need two systems to deliver public services, we need a single system that ultimately has enough innovation and components in it that can deliver and target for people on the basis of need. It’s a pretty simple sort of view of the world.

He said it was a “challenging” topic, and the prime minister and government needed to make the case to the public if it was going to push ahead.

“I think there is a real need for us to have a genuine, high-quality conversation around co-governance … when you don’t take the people with you, and you don’t frame up what it’s about, as a result you leave people behind and it drives more division.”

He would be willing to call out other politicians if they were stirring up the race debate for political reasons, he said, “but I wouldn’t jump to conclusions that that’s what’s always happening either”.

“Just because we’re having a conversation doesn’t mean we’re racist or race-baiting.

Luxon insisted the debate could and should be had “in quite a sensible, mature kind of way”.

“I think that we should be able to have a conversation without names and mud being thrown at each other. We should have a sensible, intelligent, mature conversation about it.”

He acknowledged respectful debate on race had not always been National’s approach, but “I’m now the leader, and we will do it respectfully going forward”.

In a statement, Seymour welcomed Luxon’s willingness to have a conversation on the topic, but said dismissing a referendum “would be ignoring the problem and hoping it’ll go away”.

“That’s been the strategy of successive National governments in the past, ACT is challenging Christopher Luxon’s government to be different and deliver real change,” he said.


  1. These racist buggers who are quick to attack anyone who questions those who try and debate the issue,need to be confronted head on.
    Appeasing has led us down the path to apartheid and we have reached a point where the country is going to end up like Rhodesia.

    Such dangerous times and nude nut totally indecisive.
    National continue to be complicit in our demise.



  2. Luxon must resign,
    There is no leadership in the National party
    What co governance about is people claiming privilege on the basis of race alone.
    That plainly is wrong.
    The social impact would be huge.
    Luxon even suggests that apparently it is OK to have co governance around “local and natural resources”.
    So clearly the RMA with about a third containing indigenous links will stay,
    NZ land managers and developers have plenty of financial misery stories related to iwi” rights”
    Many costing large amounts of time and money.
    One set of rules for all makes economic sense!

    None of this is as bad the division in NZ society that is already occurring.
    Our children will pay for dearly for this
    National need to find a leader with principles that are adhered to..
    Luxon must resign



  3. ……” It is about, in fact, Māori being able to assert their own self-determination, how they manage their marae, how we manage our issues.””…….

    I can assure Ms Ngarewa-Packer that I couldn’t give a flying fuck about what Maori do with their issues or their marae. What concerns me is her determination to create apartheid.

    That is what co-governance is. One small archipelago – two peoples.



  4. Seymour keeps the pressure going with supplementary questions until time runs out.

    Question 9 – David Seymour to the Prime Minister
    6 mins 43 secs : 29 March 2022

    Note how Ardern was able to play the “Get out of Card for Free” which is the big hole that was set up by the National Party.
    When you see this, you will know, it is Luxon’s time; now or never, to set that to rights and declare.
    He does not and nor can any one in the National Party!
    That is why Ardern and her crew know they have the ideology in the bag,
    Whatever the election outcome, with National it will be locked in.

    This then drags over to the Maori Health, where this “new age” religion of down trodden maori must have more priorities granted to them.
    Can we shut down KFC Macca’s etc.. No delivery of any sugary drinks, alcohol, cigarettes, for those bad health areas.

    Maybe this is where the “health pass” comes in, that only the low body mass index (BMI) can purchase such “luxury goods”,
    Strange how it would be seem to be extremely racist? well that would be how it starts with, and can not really be any different to current medical hospital systems. 🙂



  5. This should for a sharp political operator, with a mission, finish the maori seats! 🙂
    ““He Iwi tahi tatou”” “We are one people” To be treated the same under the law.

    Even that rumbling would bring a massive retreat by the maori caucus seeing they would lose everything 🙂 Or would they double down, proving the point for finishing them off.
    Then that will be one hell of debate, and nor would I be surprised that many maori people, seeing the Maori Party & Caucus with that over reach may start viewing them, as what have they ever done for us.

    Which way would it go, as timing is important.
    Will more maoris go on the maori roll, or will many pull out off it & switch to a general roll.
    Even if staying on the Maori roll which way would they vote?

    Would or rather when will ACT raise that issue.?
    Would be interesting how the polls would go?
    A very interesting election then.

    Also make it interesting ACT-N negotiation.

    Then just do it any way. 🙂



Recent posts

When Is It Not A Scam?

This was in my Junk box. I feel blessed to get two in one day. Greetings to you, How are you doing today? However, it...

Yet Another Covid “Conspiracy Theory”

Yet Another Covid “Conspiracy Theory” Confirmed As True Written by JD Rucker This isn’t new information to those who have been paying close attention, but the...

largest land predator in Europe

Dinosaurs discovered on the Isle of Wight may have been the largest land predator in Europe A dinosaur unearthed on the Isle of Wight may...

Recent comments

rightoverlabour on Have Your Say
Kea on Have Your Say
Mike Hunty on Have Your Say
Bon on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Kea on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

scattered clouds
12.3 ° C
12.3 °
12.3 °
78 %
38 %
9 °
13 °
13 °
14 °
13 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar