Home Chinese Virus Omicron A Man Made virus?

Omicron A Man Made virus?

Author

Date

Category

Was Omicron a natural evolution of the virus? Or did it come from a lab?

Steve Kirsch

Here’s evidence for the latter theory.

The first known Omicron cases discovered in Botswana were found in “foreign nationals on a diplomatic mission.”

The dominant theory surrounding the new Omicron variant’s abnormal mutations posits that they likely emerged after incubating in an immuno-compromised person for many months. While this theory does have precedence, there is troubling evidence of a different origin.
Omicron’s most recent ancestor dates back to March 2020. 

I’m sure you have seen the above graph. What you may be unaware of are some key details contained in Botswana press releases discussing the newly discovered variant (earliest known Omicron cases discovered in Botswana). In one statement made on November 26, 2021, the Botswanan Ministry of Health and Wellness revealed that Omicron “was detected on four foreign nationals who had entered Botswana on the 7th November 2021, on a diplomatic mission. The quartet tested positive for COVID-19 on the 11th November 2021 as they were preparing to return.” Also important to note, these diplomats were only in Botswana for only four days, and in this short span they managed to become patients zero, one, two, and three of the latest and greatest COVID strain?

It does not specify which country these “foreign nationals” belonged to. Why would this be and how is the media not interested in finding out? The natural speculation is that this mystery country is China, and Botswana is being pressured not to breach anonymity. Botswana has a history of indebtedness to China, so naturally they would not wish to disrupt this relationship by blaming China for yet another outbreak. Presumably, if the origin country were not China, Botswana would disclose the name as it’s in the interest of public health.

If this variant did originate from China (which seems like Occam’s razor when you weigh the alternatives), this would imply these “diplomats” were intentionally used as vessels for the release of the new variant, strategically pinning Botswana as the country of origin.

Igor Chudov eloquently discusses the potential implications surrounding Omicron if it is, indeed, a bioweapon. But boy do I hope it’s not and that this article looks like conspiratorial garbage in a couple weeks!

Previous articleProblems With IVF Clinics
Next articleHave Your Say

7 COMMENTS

  1. This could well be correct, but I still believe the correspondence I have seen clearly shows this variant was around in early August, it was reported in Hong Kong, India and Southern Africa. It could have very easily been released in Botswana, and most probably was, but it would have come out of Northern Asia, and it was well before November.
    Anyone that believes they had the tests and all the other fear porn ready to go in a few days, must believe in the tooth fairy.
    This was well planned in advance.

    4

    0

    • Where Omni-Con originated from (or released) is as elusive of how and when Covid-19 itself originated or released. As a variant of Covid-19, Omni-Con is artificial, both in media narrative and in substance. Just another manufactured agent to aid in enslavement.

      The whole Covid-19 debacle is an Omni-Shambles. In inductive thinking/analytics/science, if one (1) piece of data/evidence in a sea of 1000 pieces of data/evidence does not match the narrative of the other 999, one has to be disciplined enough to objectively re-examine things.

      With the entire Covid-19 / Vaccine debacle, 999 pieces of the data/evidence do not match the other one (1) (single truth) narrative.

      – Prior to 1543 and Nicolaus Copernicus, 99.9% of people believed the sun revolved around the earth, but it did not make it so.

      – 99.9% of media believe the fake narrative regarding global warming, but that does not make it so.

      – 99.9% of media believe the fake narrative regarding Covid-19/De3lta/Omicron/Vaccines, but that does not make it so.

      The key difference is specifics vs generalities. Actual data vs a paid for narrative. Science vs consensus.

      Those who push the generalities, the media narrative, and prefer consensus over science are still living in the dark ages. Still living in unawareness and ignorance.

      They need to wake up. They either wake up by observation of reality, or when the jab of the needle takes their families, friends, livelihoods and freedoms.

      Being awake requires a desire to get to truth and in doing so become aware.

      Being woke simply requires drinking the paid media narrative and consensus koolaid, that requires no thinking or research, and that would have you believe they have obtained the truth on your behalf.

      6

      0

Recent posts

Tell Your Stupid Greenie Mates

Plant-based meats are less nutritious than the real thing, study reveals Plant-based meats don’t pack the same protein punch, making them less nutritious than the...

Lefties In USA At It Again.

Biden Announces a New Plandemic Right before the Midterm Elections The Democrats aren’t even bothering to hide it anymore. They need lockdowns and mail-in ballots...

The War Against The Unvaxxed

The War Against The Unvaxxed Will Not Be Forgotten Written by Dr Joseph Mercola If you refused to buy into the official narrative about the COVID...

Recent comments

Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Curious on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Beorn on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

Hamilton
overcast clouds
10.3 ° C
11.7 °
7.9 °
98 %
0.5kmh
98 %
Sat
10 °
Sun
14 °
Mon
14 °
Tue
13 °
Wed
13 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.5692
EUR
1.6538
AUD
1.1090
CAD
1.2274
GBP
1.9434
JPY
0.0117
CNY
0.2338
INR
0.0201