HomeChinese VirusOmicron A Man Made virus?

Omicron A Man Made virus?

Author

Date

Category

Was Omicron a natural evolution of the virus? Or did it come from a lab?

Steve Kirsch

Here’s evidence for the latter theory.

The first known Omicron cases discovered in Botswana were found in “foreign nationals on a diplomatic mission.”

The dominant theory surrounding the new Omicron variant’s abnormal mutations posits that they likely emerged after incubating in an immuno-compromised person for many months. While this theory does have precedence, there is troubling evidence of a different origin.
Omicron’s most recent ancestor dates back to March 2020. 

I’m sure you have seen the above graph. What you may be unaware of are some key details contained in Botswana press releases discussing the newly discovered variant (earliest known Omicron cases discovered in Botswana). In one statement made on November 26, 2021, the Botswanan Ministry of Health and Wellness revealed that Omicron “was detected on four foreign nationals who had entered Botswana on the 7th November 2021, on a diplomatic mission. The quartet tested positive for COVID-19 on the 11th November 2021 as they were preparing to return.” Also important to note, these diplomats were only in Botswana for only four days, and in this short span they managed to become patients zero, one, two, and three of the latest and greatest COVID strain?

It does not specify which country these “foreign nationals” belonged to. Why would this be and how is the media not interested in finding out? The natural speculation is that this mystery country is China, and Botswana is being pressured not to breach anonymity. Botswana has a history of indebtedness to China, so naturally they would not wish to disrupt this relationship by blaming China for yet another outbreak. Presumably, if the origin country were not China, Botswana would disclose the name as it’s in the interest of public health.

If this variant did originate from China (which seems like Occam’s razor when you weigh the alternatives), this would imply these “diplomats” were intentionally used as vessels for the release of the new variant, strategically pinning Botswana as the country of origin.

Igor Chudov eloquently discusses the potential implications surrounding Omicron if it is, indeed, a bioweapon. But boy do I hope it’s not and that this article looks like conspiratorial garbage in a couple weeks!

Previous article
Next article

7 COMMENTS

  1. This could well be correct, but I still believe the correspondence I have seen clearly shows this variant was around in early August, it was reported in Hong Kong, India and Southern Africa. It could have very easily been released in Botswana, and most probably was, but it would have come out of Northern Asia, and it was well before November.
    Anyone that believes they had the tests and all the other fear porn ready to go in a few days, must believe in the tooth fairy.
    This was well planned in advance.

    4

    0

    • Where Omni-Con originated from (or released) is as elusive of how and when Covid-19 itself originated or released. As a variant of Covid-19, Omni-Con is artificial, both in media narrative and in substance. Just another manufactured agent to aid in enslavement.

      The whole Covid-19 debacle is an Omni-Shambles. In inductive thinking/analytics/science, if one (1) piece of data/evidence in a sea of 1000 pieces of data/evidence does not match the narrative of the other 999, one has to be disciplined enough to objectively re-examine things.

      With the entire Covid-19 / Vaccine debacle, 999 pieces of the data/evidence do not match the other one (1) (single truth) narrative.

      – Prior to 1543 and Nicolaus Copernicus, 99.9% of people believed the sun revolved around the earth, but it did not make it so.

      – 99.9% of media believe the fake narrative regarding global warming, but that does not make it so.

      – 99.9% of media believe the fake narrative regarding Covid-19/De3lta/Omicron/Vaccines, but that does not make it so.

      The key difference is specifics vs generalities. Actual data vs a paid for narrative. Science vs consensus.

      Those who push the generalities, the media narrative, and prefer consensus over science are still living in the dark ages. Still living in unawareness and ignorance.

      They need to wake up. They either wake up by observation of reality, or when the jab of the needle takes their families, friends, livelihoods and freedoms.

      Being awake requires a desire to get to truth and in doing so become aware.

      Being woke simply requires drinking the paid media narrative and consensus koolaid, that requires no thinking or research, and that would have you believe they have obtained the truth on your behalf.

      6

      0

Recent posts

The Trump Judgement

Have Your Say

Net Zero Plan Bullshit

Have Your Say

Trump is Right about NATO

Recent comments

revtech120 on Have Your Say
revtech120 on Have Your Say
Editor on Have Your Say
Lizziep on Have Your Say
revtech120 on Have Your Say
revtech120 on Have Your Say
revtech120 on Have Your Say
Mike Hunty on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
Hamilton
clear sky
11.2 ° C
11.2 °
11.1 °
96 %
0.5kmh
8 %
Fri
18 °
Sat
27 °
Sun
22 °
Mon
17 °
Tue
23 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.6124
EUR
1.7469
AUD
1.0600
CAD
1.1965
GBP
2.0471
JPY
0.0107
CNY
0.2240
INR
0.0195