The Messiah Who Lied

Obama ran under the empty platitude, “Yes we can!”

Obama is now proven yet again to be another leftie liar. He was only following orders from his puppet masters. He certainly wasn’t going to end wars and government corruption. Instead, he expanded them.

The corporate media has repeatedly said Obama’s administration was ‘scandal free,’ but in reality it was chock-full of scandals including the IRS targeting the Tea Party scandal, Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the GSA scandal, the EPA scandal, sending Iran billions of dollars in the middle of the night, his prosecution of whistle blowers, the Solyndra scandal, and many more. His media covered for him by downplaying or ignoring his scandals at every turn.

Where have I heard that complaint before?

Oh I remember now. Our very own Media have been ignoring and covering up the constant lying from our very own COL.

Are the cops telling the public one thing and doing another?

https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/rsa-and-police-in-standoff-over-responsible-cancelled-anzac-day-events

What are we not being told? If this is true, and I have no reason to believe it is not, then the cops have given in and the loser who caused the dreadful deaths and injury in Christchurch has won.

One has to ask, who is directing our police to take such actions. Surely they wouldn’t be doing this off their own back. Are they acting on orders from our politicians?

If it is a lack of police on the ground, I am sure they can find plenty of police busy gathering fines off the driving public, who would fill the breach at such an important ceremony as ANZAC day.

‘You’re next’ – Armagh teen charged with making death threats to New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

Donal McMahon

April 12 2019 5:20 PM

AN ARMAGH teenager has been charged with making social media death threats to the New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.

Matthew Burns (19), of Dundalk Road, Newtownhamilton, wearing a blue shirt and glasses appeared before Newry Magistrates Court on Friday.

A PSNI detective Constable from the crime cyber unit  said he could connect the accused to the charges.

The accused’s parents and sister attended the court.

As the charges were read out, Mr Burns’ mother held her hand to her head and closed her eyes.

Ms Ardern recently touched the hearts of the New Zealand people when speaking out after a mass shootings at two mosques in the city of Christchurch.

 A Twitter message to the prime minster was said to have been made directly after the terrorist attack.

The court heard that a photo of a gun silencer was sent with the message: “You’re next”.

The defendant was further charged with making similar threats to the Mayor of London Sadiq Kahn.

The accused was arrested on Thursday and taken to Banbridge PSNI station for questioning.

Two dates of offending are said to have taken place on Twitter and Facebook in December 2018 and March 20, 2019.

During interview Mr Burns stated he had far-right political leanings and had negative sentiments towards minorities, Muslims and the LGBTQ community.

Volumes of similar posts towards minorities were said to be under investigation by the PSNI cyber unit.

An application was made to restrict reporting due to the defendant’s believed poor mental health and attempts at self harm indicating a suicidal nature.

District judge McGarrity rejected the application due to a lack of medical evidence before the courts.

The defendant was released on £500 bail to his parents custody with a £1000 cash surety with the condition that he has no internet connection and adheres to a curfew.

 The magistrate warned Mr Burns: “The police are going to be watching you…next time the courts may not be so sympathetic as today.” 

The case was adjourned to May 8.

Another nutter from overseas meddling in our peaceful country…..

Ocasio-Cortez Calls NY Post’s Brutal Cover ‘Hateful,’ Defends Omar After ‘Some People Did Something’ On 9/11 Comment

That’s the cover the New York Post ran on Thursday.

It’s a reference to a comment by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), who said last month in a speech before the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) banquet in California that the September 11 massacre was not a terrorist attack, but instead dismissed it as “some people did something.”

The Post’s accompanying editorial was brutal:

How pathetic: A member of Congress can’t acknowledge what happened on one of the most horrific days in US history.

In a March 23 speech, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) complained of “the discomfort of being a second-class citizen” before claiming the Council on American-Islamic Relations “was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something, and [Muslims] were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.”

Some people did something? Wow. What a way to describe the heinous surprise attack on America that claimed 3,000 lives.

The paper went on: “Omar upped the obscure-the-facts ante Wednesday, declaring criticism of her ‘some people did something’ line to be ‘incitement,’ on the grounds that she has received death threats. Huh? She’d rightly be outraged if anyone minimized those threats as merely ‘some words from some people.’ Omar’s cavalier brushing off of the murder of thousands of innocents on 9/11 should shock all Americans, Muslims included.”

As the internet exploded, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez decided to jump into the fray.

“I’m not going to quote the NY Post’s horrifying, hateful cover. Here’s 1 fact: @IlhanMN is a cosponsor of the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund. She‘s done more for 9/11 families than the GOP who won’t even support healthcare for 1st responders – yet are happy to weaponize her faith,” the Democratic socialist wrote on Twitter.

Things took off from there.

Ocasio-Cortez then attacked Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) for a tweet he posted earlier this week when he called Omar the “First Member of Congress to ever describe terrorists who killed thousands of Americans on 9/11 as ‘some people who did something.’ “

Then, after a massive outpouring of contempt for AOC’s comments, she retweeted another posting that said “words matter” and acknowledged that “we were attacked by terrorists on 9/11.”

Meanwhile, Omar appeared on Stephen Colbert’s late-night show — but the host, a die-hard hater of President Trump, never asked her about the comment.

She said critics attack people for things “they might have insinuated.”

“It is very much embedded in a lot of our culture these days, where you will have people come after minorities for things that they say, that they might have insinuated,” she said. “No one goes after people like the folks on ‘Fox & Friends’ that actually say those words. It’s not about insinuation, right?” she said. “They actually said that I might not be an American. My loyalties might not be to this country. But I get called out. They don’t.”

Gotta’ wonder what she “insinuated” when she dismissed the 9/11 attacks as “some people did something.”

The US version of our Cindy strikes again. Maybe I should do a Cindy/Simon story on all her fuckups. It would probably be just as long.

Seven years in hiding

Julian Assange, 47, the founder of WikiLeaks, was arrested today in the United Kingdom in connection with a U.S. charge of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion for agreeing to break a password to a classified U.S. government computer.

According to court documents unsealed today, the charge relates to Assange’s alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States.

The indictment alleges that in March 2010, Assange engaged in a conspiracy with Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst in the U.S. Army, to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on U.S. Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet Protocol Network (SIPRNet), a U.S. government network used for classified documents and communications.  Manning, who had access to the computers in connection with her duties as an intelligence analyst, was using the computers to download classified records to transmit to WikiLeaks.  Cracking the password would have allowed Manning to log on to the computers under a username that did not belong to her.  Such a deceptive measure would have made it more difficult for investigators to determine the source of the illegal disclosures.

During the conspiracy, Manning and Assange engaged in real-time discussions regarding Manning’s transmission of classified records to Assange.  The discussions also reflect Assange actively encouraging Manning to provide more information.  During an exchange, Manning told Assange that “after this upload, that’s all I really have got left.”  To which Assange replied, “curious eyes never run dry in my experience.”

Assange is charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion and faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison if convicted.  Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties.  A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

Extradition to the United States will be handled by the Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs.