Home(Chinese) USA VirusPfizer faces legal action over ‘vaccine’ lies

Pfizer faces legal action over ‘vaccine’ lies

Author

Date

Category

WOULD 92 per cent of American adults have had a Covid shot had they known the ‘vaccines’ offered only a 0.85 per cent reduction in risk? Would young men have taken the jab if they had known it did not prevent transmission?

Americans came to understand that the media campaigns supporting the shots were fraudulent. The touted benefits – preventing infection and transmission – were lies. In response, fewer than one in five Americans elected to receive ‘boosters’ despite multi-billion dollar propaganda campaigns.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has now brought a suit to bring accountability for the fraud that resulted in record profits for the pharmaceutical industry. He has filed a complaint alleging that Pfizer misrepresented Covid vaccine efficacy and ‘conspired to censor public discourse’ in violation of Texas’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA).

While Big Pharma enjoys immense government-provided insulation from legal liability for vaccine injuries, it may not lie to promote those products.

Paxton alleges that the $75billion Pfizer has raked in through sales of Covid vaccines were the ‘direct and proximate result’ of the company’s deceit.

The DTPA requires Paxton to prove two questions to succeed in his case. First, he must establish that the company lied or failed to disclose known information concerning its Covid vaccine. Second, he must prove that the company’s fraud was designed to promote sales of the shots.

Brownstone previously analyzed the applicability of the DTPA against Moderna and concluded that the answers to both questions were in the affirmative. Now, Paxton’s lawsuit threatens Pfizer with fines of $10million as well as awards of ‘restitution, damages, or civil penalties’.

Paxton’s case argues that Pfizer deceived the public on three issues: (1) the efficacy of the vaccine; (2) whether the shots reduced the risk of transmission; and (3) the company’s efforts to ‘censor persons who threatened to disseminate the truth’.

In each instance, the company skewed the public debate to induce Americans to take its shots. The efforts stripped us of the right to informed consent, deceiving us on purported benefits while hiding established risks.

Efficacy

First, Paxton targets the now-familiar falsehoods that the company, led by CEO Albert Bourla, touted, including that the shots had ‘95% efficacy’ and worked against mutations of the virus.

Paxton’s critiques do not require the benefit of hindsight. Pfizer’s own data showed that the vaccine was merely 0.85 per cent effective in reducing the likelihood that an individual would contract Covid (known as absolute risk reduction). Put differently, Pfizer’s clinical data showed that ‘preventing one Covid-19 case required vaccinating 119’.

Despite this unconvincing data, Bourla claimed there was ‘initial evidence of our vaccine’s ability to prevent Covid-19’. Bourla later said that the shots had ‘100 per cent’ efficacy rates against mutations of the virus, including the Delta variant. Not only was this a lie; Pfizer never tested the shots against the variants. Still, in May 2021 Bourla baselessly claimed that ‘no variant identified so far . . . escapes the protection of our vaccine’.

Three months later, the company issued a press release saying that boosters would ‘preserve and even exceed the high levels of protection against . . . relevant variants’. Shortly thereafter, the United States exercised its option to purchase 500million more doses of Pfizer’s Covid vaccines.

These lies clearly and directly induced Americans to take products with illusory benefits. The claims were fabricated, and they led to billions of dollars in windfalls for Bourla and Pfizer.

Transmission

Pfizer’s marketing relied on convincing healthy young adults and teenagers to get shots despite the negligible risk that Covid posed to them. Bourla used transmission to launch a moral blackmail campaign. He told teenagers that they should get the shots to ‘protect . . . their loved ones’. He later tweeted that ‘widespread vaccination is a critical tool to help stop transmission’.

Under oath, company officials later admitted that they had never tested whether the vaccines reduced transmission.

In October 2022, Pfizer spokeswoman Janine Small appeared at a European Parliament hearing. ‘Was the Pfizer Covid vaccine tested on stopping transmission of the virus before it entered the market?’ asked Dutch MEP Rob Roos. ‘No!’ Small responded emphatically. ‘We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market; and from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk.’

Under the DTPA, Paxton must prove that the company misrepresented information regarding the vaccine in an effort to promote sales of its products. With the vast majority of Americans under 70 facing zero substantial risk from Covid infection, the lies regarding transmission were critical to expand the customer base.

This deception underpinned the mandates in 2021 as government and corporate officials insisted that vaccination was necessary to keep healthy adults’ coworkers and neighbors safe. By December 2021, Pfizer’s stock price had doubled from the onset of the pandemic in February 2020.

Censorship

As Pfizer committed to deceiving the public, it had to ensure that journalists would not uncover its corporate misdeeds. Paxton’s suit outlines how the company ‘sought to intimidate and silence . . . journalist Alex Berenson’.

As Berenson reported on the efficacy, or lack thereof, of mRNA ‘vaccines’, Pfizer board member Dr Scott Gottlieb colluded with Twitter to silence his reporting. In August 2021, Berenson tweeted that Pfizer’s vaccine ‘doesn’t stop infection . . . or transmission’, and had a ‘limited window of efficacy’. Despite the veracity of these statements, Gottlieb wrote to Twitter officials encouraging them to ban Berenson’s heresy.

Hours later, Berenson received a permanent ban (he was reinstated following a lawsuit). Now, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is a defendant in Berenson’s case against the Biden Administration, which accuses White House officials of colluding with private actors in Big Tech and Big Pharma to usurp Berenson’s First Amendment rights.

Paxton’s case also outlines how Pfizer worked to silence scientists who discussed the benefits of natural immunity, calling the rhetoric ‘corrosive’ to the public’s confidence in their products. The aim was simple: shield Americans from the truth so that they would continue to get the product.

A Rare Opportunity to Strike Back

To this point, ‘victories’ against the hegemon that emerged in 2020 have been defensive in nature. Groups have fended off vaccine mandates, states have resisted calls for renewed lockdowns, and journalists have begun to expose the corruption that shattered Western civilization.

These efforts, though important, have failed to bring accountability against those who usurped our civil liberties and pillaged the national treasury. Paxton’s suit strikes at the heart of the corruption behind the Covid regime: how their success required mass deception and their profits depended on lies.

Though $10million in fines is little compared to the $75billion in revenue that Pfizer raked in from vaccines alone, the suit signifies that the resistance is at last on the offensive.

Big Pharma sees this is a grave threat, and its lobbying forces led a failed impeachment effort against Paxton this fall. They threw him out of his office, and disabled his ability to do his job that the voters sent him to do. Turning up nothing, the legislature rejected the entire drama. Now he is back and working and this is the result: accountability at last.

The steep drop in demand for Covid shots reveals how Pfizer depended upon fraud to promote their most lucrative product. Once Americans knew the truth, demand dropped by over 75 per cent.

Now, Paxton’s suit brings that fraud to trial.

Previous article
Next article

13 COMMENTS

  1. 53,000 excess deaths in the UK last year 9% above normal ,nothing to see here go about your business folks, at least the figures are being made public over there not so much here in the land of the long white brow beaten terrified sheeple..

    10

    0

  2. Globalists want everybody to be a grey fearful global mulato consumer. Ethnic moral tight knit groups are their enemy. Old school religious Americans, dapper Englishmen, the German volk are their enemies. Why do they bother with Kiwis, our little bunch of independent minded farmers, will never amount to a threat to their evil plans of world domination. Are we compliant globalist Petri dish people? Are we where they test their nefarious plans? Jacinda’s fine work lulled them into going all in.

    9

    0

  3. Beorn , I’ve been convinced for decades that our country has been the Guinea pig and canary in the coal mine for all sorts of things socially economically and medically ,a great little country for experimenting on a mostly compliant populace , you know, that long treasured phrase we’ve all been so proud of “ punching above our weight ,the 1st in the world to do things” , our politicians are all shit and always have been.
    I wonder if the powers that be ever thought that their plandemic would backfire and open more peoples eyes to the total corruption of their so called leaders ??

    11

    0

  4. Yet another story about how the people responsible will be held to account. The people who’s job it is to protect are the ones who did it. There is no authority to appeal to.

    How about running hundreds of stories on something serious like the housing crisis or the US Israel lobby.

    0

    9

  5. Posted this late last night in this thread where others also put some interesting links.
    https://ysb.co.nz/have-your-say-1717/#comment-377155

    So apt that public health could twist the safety aspects a couple of times over, to be able to call for collective mandated dosing for “grannies” & “karens” with the “think of the children” also.

    But note many of Pfizer employees resist the concept of being vaxxed themselves at Pfizers behest.
    Tweet 1:-

    When Pfizer mandated the vaccine in August 2021 to its employees, some colleagues of mine started a “Phyzer Vaxx council” there were hundreds of us in it, including high ranking employees.
    .
    Everyday we discussed the evils being done and the things we were supposed to just pretend was normal.
    I will also add to this post, internal emails from Pfizer, proof of my employment and just flat nonsense from the company.
    .
    🍿 enjoy, these have never been seen or posted anywhere else.
    Names have been blacked out to protect those still in the plant or those who didn’t give consent for their names to be shared.
    🍿 it’s also where I first heard of project veritas/

    https://twitter.com/MelissaMcAtee92/status/1741186958506741996

    One can click on those photos, and expand, magnify and then able to follow the arrow to see the large size that one can read in full.

    Tweet 2 :–
    https://twitter.com/MelissaMcAtee92/status/1741187226543726857

    Tweet 3 :—
    https://twitter.com/MelissaMcAtee92/status/1741187450473517195

    Tweet 4 ;—-
    https://twitter.com/MelissaMcAtee92/status/1741187558384574894

    Tweet 5 :—–
    https://twitter.com/MelissaMcAtee92/status/1741187641771425858

    Tweet 6 :——
    https://twitter.com/MelissaMcAtee92/status/1741187955253792944

    This parallels & proves the doubts many of us had about the Pfizer vax, were already seen by the aware Pfizer employees, when their own mandates in August 2021 were going to consume themselves.

    An article summary of this:–
    https://uncutnews.ch/pfizer-mitarbeiter-sprechen-ueber-injektionen-diese-nachrichten-wurden-noch-nie-veroeffentlicht/
    I did use google translate from German to English.

    The cursed Ministry of Health, MedSafeNZ, etc., plus whatever media needs to be made aware of this, by whatever means, even to ask government officials through the OIA, if they are aware of this?
    So at a later date, it is on the record, they can not even say this was not raised with them, then why they did not even mention this;— to update the NZ Covid inquiry?

    9

    0

  6. From the article:

    …….”Paxton’s case argues that Pfizer deceived the public on three issues: (1) the efficacy of the vaccine; (2) whether the shots reduced the risk of transmission; and (3) the company’s efforts to ‘censor persons who threatened to disseminate the truth’.”…….

    Such an accusation against Pfizer would never succeed in Godzone. Here the lying cunts who made up the “podium of truth” did the dissemination & censorship.

    7

    0

  7. Waikatogirl. ,looking back now it is unbelievable what the cowardly creeping sheeple in our midst bowed down to, a skinny bow legged stoop shouldered megalomaniac whose every second word was a blatant lie ,FFS she got standing ovations from the gutless NZ’rs who attacked the unpoisoned as unclean and worthy of locking up and being forcibly vaccinated as well as re educated to accept the glorious leaders every command ,like “don’t dare talk over the fence to your neighbours “ ,remember the Berlin wall type road blockades at Auckland’s boundaries ,that filthy CNUT must be the focus of some unrelenting pushback by the untrained amongst us all for a long long time whenever we get an opportunity..

    4

    0

  8. ‘Excess deaths STARTED with the vaccine programme’ | Top doctor’s stark warnings being ‘ignored’
    https://youtu.be/9uV154LQ1J4
    8 mins 11 secs : Jan 3rd 2024 : GBNews : David Farage :

    Professor of Oncology, Angus Dalgleish, says that he and his colleagues’ warnings about the excess deaths as a result of the vaccine programme are being ‘ignored’ on multiple occasions.

    Bearing in mind an aging population. a rapidly growing population, but the figures are calculated with that in mind.
    But noting the younger age bands seem to be very much in the action of excess deaths.
    New bivalent vaccines? mouse tested? in a group think !

    Oncology, too much time wasted before diagnoses.
    Susceptibility to many increasing cancers, seems like a relationship to increased obesity, & then there are other health issues.

    4

    0

  9. To read click on English then x

    https://uncutnews.ch/unglaubliche-zahlen-zur-uebersterblichkeit-im-jahr-2023/
    Incredible mortality figures in 2023
    January 4, 2024
    Health / healing methods / alternative medicine / nutrition

    In 2023, many countries faced a major problem that the mainstream media paid no attention to: high mortality. John Campbell wonders why this topic is avoided like the plague. He finds it strange that mortality is not at the top of the political agenda.

    Mortality was in Israel until the 44th. Week at 11.8 percent, in 2022 at 15.4 percent. In the Netherlands, mortality was until 44. Week at 14,209 (11.3 percent), in 2022 at 19,326 (13.2 percent).

    In New Zealand, mortality was until the 44th. Week at 14.5 percent and in 2022 at 17.6 percent.

    3

    0

Recent posts

Have Your Say

Monday Fun

Have Your Say

Recent comments

Viking on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say
Sooty on Have Your Say
Nunnas on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Pinky1 on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
Ross12 on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
Hamilton
light rain
14.4 ° C
14.4 °
14.1 °
91 %
4.5kmh
100 %
Mon
15 °
Tue
18 °
Wed
15 °
Thu
12 °
Fri
13 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.6643
EUR
1.7933
AUD
1.0982
CAD
1.2163
GBP
2.0861
JPY
0.0107
CNY
0.2301
INR
0.0199