Studies Confirm Pfizer Vaccine Immunity Wanes At 2 Months
By
A study from Israel covering 4,800 healthcare workers showed antibody levels waned rapidly after two doses of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. Meanwhile, Pfizer today officially asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to authorize its vaccine for children 5 to 11 years old.
Two studies published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine confirm any immune protection offered by two doses of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine drops off after roughly two months — although protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death remains strong, the authors of the studies said.
A prospective longitudinal study from Israel covering 4,800 healthcare workers showed antibody levels waned rapidly after two doses of vaccine “especially among men, among persons 65 years of age or older and among persons with immunosuppression.”
Antibodies were tested during the baseline period defined as four to 17 days after receipt of a second vaccine dose, and every four weeks thereafter over a six-month period.
The highest titers after receipt of the second vaccine dose were observed during days four through 30, so this was defined as the peak period.
Because researchers could not perform neutralizing antibody assays in all study participants, they selected a subgroup that included higher proportions of persons with risk factors of interest, such as an age of 65 years or older and coexisting conditions.
The researchers noted that levels of so-called neutralizing antibodies — the immune system’s first line of defense against infection — correlate with protection against infection, but for this study researchers studied only antibody levels, CNN reported.
Researchers also saw a substantial reduction in the IgG level each month, and a significant decrease in neutralizing antibody titers.
“Published work about many vaccines, such as those against measles, mumps and rubella, has shown a small decrease each year of 5% to 10% in the neutralizing antibody levels,” researchers wrote. “We found that a significant and rapid decrease in humoral response to the BNT162b2 [Pfizer/BioNTech] vaccine was observed within months after vaccination.”
A second study from Qatar looked at actual infections among the nation’s highly vaccinated population, who mostly received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.
Estimated effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was negligible for the first two weeks after the first Pfizer dose, increased to 36.8 percent in the third week after the first dose, and reached its peak at 77.5 percent in the first month after the second dose.
Pfizer has consistently claimed the company’s own efficacy data demonstrate 95 percent efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, which was not observed in this study.
The researchers said effectiveness declined gradually, starting from the first month after the second dose, accelerated after the fourth month and reached a low level of approximately 20 percent in months 5 through 7 after the second dose.
The authors of the Qatar study, Laith Abu-Raddad of Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar and colleagues, wrote:
“BNT162b2-induced protection against infection builds rapidly after the first dose, peaks in the first month after the second dose, and then gradually wanes in subsequent months. The waning appears to accelerate after the fourth month, to reach a low level of approximately 20 percent in subsequent months.”
At of the end of the study (Sept. 5), a total of 8,203 SARS-CoV-2 Pfizer breakthrough infections had been recorded among 947,035 participants who received one vaccine dose, and 10,543 breakthrough infections had been recorded among 907,763 participants who received two doses.
The percentage of all daily SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections from both Pfizer and Moderna reached 36.4 percent on Sept. 5, with 77.2 percent of breakthrough infections attributed to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.
Pfizer-Funded Study Shows Vaccine Efficacy Declines At Six Months
A Pfizer-funded study published Monday in The Lancet found the efficacy of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine fell below 50% about six months after the second dose.
The study found Pfizer’s vaccine was 88 percent effective in the first month after full vaccination but dropped to 47 percent effectiveness at about six months.
The study also found the vaccine to be “highly effective” against the Delta variant, which was found to be more than 90 percent effective in the first months before dropping to 53 percent effective after four months.
Researchers determined the waning immunity had to do with the amount of time since an individual was given the second shot, rather than due to the highly infectious Delta strain, The Hill reported.
“Our results provide support for high effectiveness of [Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine] against hospital admissions up until around 6 months after being fully vaccinated, even in the face of widespread dissemination of the Delta variant,” the researchers wrote.
“Reduction in vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infections over time is probably primarily due to waning immunity with time rather than the Delta variant escaping vaccine protection,” they added.
For the study, researchers looked at the 3.4 million electronic records from the Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) healthcare system for patients ages 12 and up, and studied them from December 2020 to August.
Researchers determined individuals fully vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had an overall 73 percent effective protection against COVID infection and 90 percent effective protection against COVID-related hospitalization.
Pfizer Asks FDA To Authorize COVID Vaccine For Emergency Use For Children Ages 5 To 11
Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, today asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to authorize their COVID vaccine for emergency use for children 5 to 11 years old.
According to The Washington Post, an FDA advisory committee is scheduled to meet Oct. 26 to discuss Pfizer’s pediatric COVID vaccine.
FDA officials said once vaccine data for younger children was submitted, the agency could authorize a vaccine for younger children in a matter of weeks — not months — but it would depend on the timing and quality of the data provided.
Pfizer and BioNTech submitted initial data to the FDA last month for a regimen of two 10-microgram doses in children — one-third the amount given to older patients — but had not formally requested authorization until now.
According to Alex Berenson, former New York Times reporter and author of 12 novels and two nonfiction books — and currently author of the Substack publication “Unreported Truths” — said Prizer’s clinical data of its COVID vaccine for 5- to 11-year-olds showed no evidence of actual health benefit to the children who received it.
“In other words, what Pfizer demonstrated in its 2,300-patient child trial is that its mRNA doses can make your kids make spike proteins (and have side effects), Berenson said.
“Per Pfizer’s Sept. 20 press release announcing the trial’s results, the trial didn’t show the vaccine reduced hospitalizations (which are basically non-existent in healthy children) or even mild cases,” Berenson said.
Nowhere in Pfizer’s press release did it say the vaccine did anything to make kids stay healthier, Berenson explained. “But it did reveal side effects generally comparable to those observed in participants 16 to 25 years of age,” he said. “In other words, (sometimes severe) headaches, fatigue and fever.”
“Clinically significant myocarditis?” Berenson asked. “Who knows? With barely 1,000 boys receiving the vaccine, even fairly common side effects could go unnoticed.”
Maya Sen, a political scientist and professor at Harvard commented on the news: “It’s interesting to see people who all along have said that COVID isn’t that big of a deal for kids immediately pick up on the Pfizer research design as being supporting evidence of that,” Sen added.
Matthew Yglesias, writer, editor and senior fellow at the Niskanen Center responded: “Serious cases are so rare in children that it’s extremely hard to do a trial with sufficient statistical power to tell if you are preventing them.”
Jeff Zients, the White House COVID response coordinator, called Pfizer’s pediatric vaccine filing “an important development.”
Zients, appearing Thursday on CNN, said the country has the supply to quickly distribute the shots once the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention approve it.
Zients said the Biden administration is working with states to make it easy for parents to immunize their children by setting up convenient times and places to administer the shots.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-vaccine-immunity-fda-kids-5-to-11/
This push for jabbing kids has nothing to do with health. Obviously Pfizer makes a few more billions, but there has to something else going on as well, which to some is more important than kids health.
Yes everyone needs to start getting angry and demanding answers now.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1441411088453718018
Devolution of COVID vaccine efficacy. Only 2 minutes but worth watching.
Sorry, don’t know how to isolate it, just scroll down to Dr Fauci.
https://twitter.com/Ireland2020/status/1441411088453718018
Speaking with my grandson last night and he told of his girlfriends family who went to the vaxathon over the weekend. They got a huge amount of free stuff. I hear it was an unbelievable amount for just getting the jab. Vouchers for all sorts not just food outlets. How much is this costing us all I wonder? Enough to bankrupt the country? I bet D L and robbers son and hippy the kid wish it will be enough to send us into China’s hands for ever more. If you have to bribe people for a jab what the hell is in it for a start??? This is abhorrent for the country.
So bribes are the de rigueur for the public to being jabbed ;for the good of society.
So it would be that bribes are the de rigueur for politicians, for the good of society. 🙁
What ever form those bribes take, the fish rots from the head.
Paraphrasing Cheech and Chong:
If it looks like dogshit, feels like dogshit, smells like dogshit, and tastes like dogshit, it IS dogshit.
If Covid-19 spreads like a parasite, infects like a parasite, replicates like a parasite, creates symptoms like a parasite infection, and is easily cured by anti-parasitical drugs, then it IS a parasite.
You can’t vaccinate against parasites, fleas, tics or headlice. You can only treat them. Cat and Dog flea or de-worming treatments work to kill existing fleas or worms presently in their system. Same with humans.
Anyone who has lived or worked in Africa or third world countries know the debilitating effect of parasites. Anti-parasitic drugs such as Doxycycline and Ivermectin are standard issue, taken dailsy, every day. And the rule of thumb is you don’t bother treating most diseases, you get rid of the parasites and the disease disappears. This includes Malaria and Ebola.
So two months is about right for an anti-parasitical.
So in effect Pfizer have sold the world an anti-parasitical drug at 1000 times the cost of Ivermectin, to combat a parasite infection developed in a lab by “gain of function” from a parasite found in bats.
Which is why they insist in calling it a virus, because if they called it what it is, a parasite, it could be treated for a few cents instead of $30 – $50 per shot.
The need to have everyone “vaccinated” to prevent the spread makes sense from a parasite point of view, not a virus point of view. But if someone who is vaccinated can catch and spread the “virus” (parasite) then clearly the “vaccine” only works at the time of treatment or for a few weeks, just like any other de-worming product.
But heres the rub
[1] The “vaccine” also contains the spike protein which is a pathogen, and disable O2/CO2 exchange.
[2] The “vaccine” also contains Graphene Oxide nanobots, which have other “uses” and “effects”, including identification so that a scanner can pick up if you are vaccinated, and how long ago.
[3] The “vaccine” screws with your immune system. Unlike traditional vaccines, modern vaccines face vaccine resistance from existing anti-bodies, so agents accompany the vaccine to remove existing anti-bodies to allow the new “vaccine” to take hold. This is the cause of ADE, and contributes to side effects and long term immunity problems. Even the new tetanus vaccines are producing serious side effects.
[4] As has been discovered by several doctors and medical researchers, live organisms and parasites have been discovered in the vaccines, and the blood of vaccinated people. Organisms of a size much much larger than the size of the Covid particle, alive and self propelling. And parasites that invade red blood cells in the same way that the malaria parasite invades red blood cells.
Many good points made, Thanks DylanHunt.
Cheech & Chong were great back then, with great nubs of truth, with a crack-up. 🙂
That line should also be expressed more to our techno-bureau-crats of “Deep State”
This just means ongoing vaccines. Forever.
The pink landwhale said it herself over the weekend. Immunity PEAKS at 2weeks after the 2nd jab…. its all downhill from there.
BN also posted a link late last night on “The worst cold ever” making headlines in many news outlets in europe and abroad if thats not new fear porn it could be a sign of ruined immune systems in the vaxxed