HomeUS PoliticsPresidential Election Wasn’t ‘Rigged’; It Was ‘Fortified'

Presidential Election Wasn’t ‘Rigged’; It Was ‘Fortified’

Author

Date

Category

NOW THEY BRAG ABOUT HOW THEY STOLE THE ELECTION

Time magazine has published a detailed account of what it describes as a “conspiracy” between “left-wing activists and business titans” to create “an extraordinary shadow effort” to “protect” the 2020 presidential election.

Time has published an explainer piece offering a fascinating insight into how the presidential election was won. It’s titled “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign that Saved the 2020 Election.”

The fascinating part is what it tells us about the brazenness of the left in general and the corrupt, mendacious MSM in particular: they are now heavy-hinting that they cheated but want you to know that it’s all OK because they were doing it to not to destroy democracy but to preserve and enhance it.
Here’s the key paragraph:

That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.

Do you see what they just did there?

The Democrats (and their sympathisers) didn’t rig the election. They just fortified it by taking care to ensure the right guy won rather than the wrong guy won, regardless of what those pesky voters might misguidedly have wanted.

Could this have anything to do, you wonder, with President Trump’s upcoming impeachment trial?

My suspicion that Time’s piece is both pre-emptive strike and damage limitation exercise. It anticipates the possibility that Trump will provide evidence in support of his claim that the election was “stolen.”

This evidence will be much harder to brush under the carpet in the Senate.

I’m reminded here of an old article from the Times (of London), which described the process whereby political projects are advanced by stealth.

It is at first denied that any radical new plan exists; it is then conceded that it exists but ministers swear blind that it is not even on the political agenda; it is then noted that it might well be on the agenda but is not a serious proposition; it is later conceded that it is a serious proposition but that it will never be implemented; after that it is acknowledged that it will be implemented but in such a diluted form that it will make no difference to the lives of ordinary people; at some point it is finally recognised that it has made such a difference, but it was always known that it would and voters were told so from the outset.

This is where we are headed now with the”‘stolen” election. Columnists who blithely assured us that the election was above board may now begin to finesse their position.

“OK, so maybe it was rigged,” they will start to concede. ‘But isn’t that always the case with elections? And anyway it’s a done deal now.”

Sorry, my bad — that use of the word “rigged” was a complete slip of the tongue.

What I meant to say is that the presidential election was “fortified.” And what’s not to like about that, eh?

Watch them running scared like the rats they are, once Trump gets going at his impeachment trial. Trump has nothing to lose and all to gain. Is it any wonder the Rhinos are joining the Dems in trying to control this sham trial.

9 COMMENTS

  1. The thing about this admission is that if Trump ever wins again there will be sedition charges all around. Under the insurrection act Time magazine will be shut down and forced to cough up the sources of their information or face accomplice and/or conspiracy to commit treason charges.

    4

    0

    • I do not agree.
      The time to do that was 2017/18.

      It will not happen now.

      Time Mag/Rag has always been seditious.
      I found it very slanted reading in the 1970s and never bothered again.
      The articles were imbalanced and left things hanging.
      Ergo, they intended to misdirect.
      Playboy actually had better articles.
      They had Hitler as Man of the year in 1938 then Stalin twice.
      Popes several times. WTF.
      The rag has been complete woke bollocks this century.

      2

      0

  2. Magoo@1000

    In theory yes, that is what SHOULD occur, but with the various Dem-aligned fifth-columnists now resident in the SCOTUS, it is unlikely that anything will actually happen, which is a shame as various well-known political individuals really DO need to face justice.

    One can however hope…

    4

    0

    • AOCSmollett is why there is a huge problem.
      Politicians have been replaced largely with bought and paid for advocates.
      Esp in the USA.

      In NZ the idiots do their psycho shit without extra pay like Two mums, Davidson and Golriz.
      Mind you NZ politicians are well paid.
      Too much so for any ‘skill’ shown.
      This includes the Notional MPs from the last 10+ years.

      4

      0

Recent posts

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Things I Will Not Miss

Have Your Say

Recent comments

Saggy on Have Your Say
Tarquin on Have Your Say
Mike Hunty on Have Your Say
Saggy on Have Your Say
Saggy on Have Your Say
Francis on Have Your Say
Upyou2 on Have Your Say
The Ancient Hooligan on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
Hamilton
moderate rain
21.7 ° C
21.7 °
21.3 °
83 %
5.7kmh
100 %
Mon
21 °
Tue
18 °
Wed
22 °
Thu
21 °
Fri
22 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.6384
EUR
1.7758
AUD
1.0692
CAD
1.2083
GBP
2.0732
JPY
0.0109
CNY
0.2277
INR
0.0198