I had a we incinerator fire the other week, no fire ban, some smoke went over the boundary and I got a visit from the fire brigade, Not the first time either, what a fucking waste of their time, I hope someone is monitoring this!!! Love thy neighbour lol.

Agitator.

ED,
My key words were “respectful of professionals”. I know professional Police, ex Police, Doctors and Nurses etc. Many of these fine people have been forced into compliance, but in no way agree with it. I also find Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, Luc Montagnier, etc as very professional.

The rabble that are pushing the vaccines in order to do the bidding of Pfizer, Gates, Fauci et all, may have jobs and titles that somehow give them a piece of paper that has the word “professional” stamped on it, but they are rank amateurs. They offer spin, cliches, jargon, and grandiose sweeping generalities instead of responding to specifics.

The professionals reading these blogs voluntarily, and those on the fence that harbour nagging doubts despite their govt job description, both deserve rational and respectful debate in order to create seeds of doubt and give certainty they are not alone, and that their logic is not flawed. Good logic is always appealing to the rational mind. Anger not so much.

Those amateur imposters who pretend to be professionals together with those in the service of their miscreant overlords, will not be swayed by foul language and insults. If anything, our irrational objections simple prove to them that we are misguided conspiracy theorists.

As an example of that concept, I have never won an argument with a JW at my door. The more you argue, the more they obsessively dig in “to save your soul”. Over the years I have however left many pondering or in doubt of their own convictions by simply asking a directed question.

With “Covid and the Vaccines” (I know, it sounds like a millennial punk rock band), and for that matter climate change, I find no amount of arguing or berating does any good. A directed question or two, that would require them to do actual research helps.

Especially when you tell them “I’m happy to listen and discuss the matter in depth once you have researched the question properly and come back with your research findings, including raw data, and until such time the subject is shelved.” If they claim to “have done the research” I ask about what processes they used, or “how did you get on with XYZ analytical process?” or “explain to me the primary, and secondary lung defense mechanisms?”, or “explain to me the spike protein, and the impact it has.”

Specifics have a way of leveling the playing field, Specifics are also vital in dealing with narcissists, and people and populations caught up the narcissist’s mind games.

The only way to to stop an idiot in his tracks is to have him believe he is one step away from walking and falling into a bottomless pit, that no amount of digging will get him out of.

Being respectful also allows those on the fence to go the right way without a ton of “I told you so” or abuse waiting to greet them.

If things get really bad, and words no longer count, then it will probably be said 90% of police and military that will jump the fence to enforce Nuremberg 2.0 or to fight for our rights.

Let the idiots on the other side feed their aggression and go to the dark side. Only by controlling our urges to fight or run do we stand to overcome the dark side.

Change is coming. You are moire likely to see police and army do the right thing in the face of calm certainty and resistance, than unhinged opposing aggression. I hope to see core Green party zealots implode and pull away from Labour or demand Shaw’s resignation. I hope to see whistleblowers coming out, combined with more unexplained vaccine deaths. We have to remain vigilant, because people on the fence will be drawn to those who stand on principle, in order to seek safety. We need to make them feel welcome, instead of being fearful of loose unpredictable units.

That is my opinion. I may be wrong however.