🚩This morning Michael Law’s announced he is going to “Hammer” the right to use the overhang strategy for the next 9 weeks – OR the right will lose, and the most extreme radical left government NZ has ever seen will wreck the country.
Laws correctly surmises that all the 3 centre right parties will never openly advocate splitting strategically voting from fear of being accused of rorting the MMP system – “BUT WE THE VOTERS ARE FREE TO ADVOCATE THE STRATEGY TO OTHERS”
National voters must get through their head that they need to give their party vote to NZF or ACT or the centre right will lose.
NZF & ACT supporters need to swallow a rat and vote for their Nats candidate to create the over hang or the centre right will lose.
Laws says “Most NZ’ers are smart enough to know how to split their vote, we aren’t that dumb!”
“Te Pati Māori are screwing the scrum with openly advocating for an overhang …
is the centre right going to stand for that and lose ? OR do they screw them back and embrace Don Brash’s strategy”
“If the right split their votes and the coalition hold government Luxon will be dumped shortly after regardless .. he’ ridden that party down from 38% to 29% because he’s clueless!”
THE OVER HANG IS THE KING MAKER !
Anglo saxon explains it here
This is the most important editorial you have published Chris. Good onya.
i see fruity boy is upset by this… me thinks its really cuz it absolutely destroys any easy polling methods.
plus hes a bit woke and likes woke nats, imo his whinge about stronger nzf and act is a real sell for the idea, esp the knowledge that nats will get no list seats.
https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2026/09/a_stupid_plan_not_a_cunning_plan.html
FUCK THE NATS, can we also slightly tweak this voting strategy… apply it to all seats except botany (vote stobo) and possibly epsom cuz fuck goldsmith.
a great way for the nation to do a much needed purge of the national party and a way to 100% get rid of luxon without the collateral damage that goes with a party rolling a pm.
lets go nz, just fucking do it. if you dont like the nat mp or dont like nzf or act just hold your nose and swallow the dead rat.
only other way to combat tpm fuckery is for a chunk of voters be well co ordinated and sacrifice their party vote to tpm to reduce their overhang but that has a huge risk of giving them extra seats if they get too much party vote cuz lets face it we dont know how many will actually listen to tpm strategy.
wow, when i first posted the kb link there were only 6 kb comments. now theres heaps and im kinda suprised how many kb folk are against farrar on this, usually the majority are cucks to the national party come hell or high water but a miracle is happening and many are seeing the shit reality of the situation the useless nats have created.
farrar and the nats that watch the blog will be fucking shitting themselves.
it will also fuck with the upcoming polling, as long as nzf and nats go up take zero notice of headlines screaming nats polling is crashing and luxon needs to be rolled.
The bonus is in rural areas we will more than likely end up with 2 mps this way as nz1 list is very rural nz
The fact so many are against Fruity is a good sign that this message is finally getting through. Shows most National supporters now know what to do to keep the left out
If fruity boy is upset, quick do it some more!
Thanks for the link to KiwiBlog, SB. Really interesting none of the posts to the article agree with Farrar.
Personally I have a real problem —Genter is the MP for my electorate. The National guy, this time is an Indian lawyer who will have no show. The Labour guy is a trade union lawyer. Nicole McKee will probably get my electorate vote even though unfortunately she has no show.
yup, in safe left seats just do what you want.
only exception would be if a top candidate was looking promising then could pay to swallow a rat and vote the labour/green candidate just incase top do come in under 5% so they cant coat tail in on an electorate.
So, assuming we follow this the question is then ACT or NZ1st. The strategy makes sense, but needs refining. And I am not sure what the best strategy is either. I would argue that couples should split their vote, one Party Votes Act, the other NZ1st. This would ensure both reach the 5% threshold. Just putting this out there….
yup thats a good strategy too.
probs more lean nzf if 5% is at threat cuz seymour should retain epsom seat.
i think both parties will piss in tho esp if the centre right voters are going to grow some balls and split their vote.
You are giving the natives far to much credit in the intelligence area to do that
are you saying the gullable or butthurt maori will or wont party vote tpm?
They will return to their natural home of more handouts, liarbour. Their flirtation with the wracist party has been a flop.
tpm wont go away tho, you can safely assume at least 3, probably 5 tpm mps back in parliament.
those maori roll voters will party vote labour but mostly electorate tpm.
i think prior to election we will see labour openly agree to this tactic esp cuz the right is now pushing the same voting strategy.
No list bum warmers! Me I see no problem with no bloody seat warmers.
As long as they are ACT of NZF.
This is from a former ACT MP.
Owen Jennings: The Stark Choice – Country before Party