Home Space Scientific Flaws In The Big Bang Theory

Scientific Flaws In The Big Bang Theory

Author

Date

Category

Top Ten Scientific Flaws In The Big Bang Theory

Written by John Watson

You might not be aware, but there are many things that proponents of the Big Bang theory, including many scientists and 99% of college science professors, do not want you to know about the Big Bang theory.

The first is that there is a good reason it is only called a “theory”. The proponents of this theory would have you believe that it is set in stone and factual; but this is far from the truth. In fact, the Big Bang theory has so many holes that there is not enough evidence to even confidently say that it could even possibly be valid.

So let’s see the top ten scientific flaws in the Big Bang theory and show you why it is just a theory. Some of these theories are extremely complex, so I will try to put it in layman’s terms as much as possible so almost anyone could understand them.

10 The Magnetic Monopole Problem

Why it’s a problem. A magnetic monopole is, in short, a particle that contains an electrical charge, creating a net “magnetic charge” within the individual particle. If the Big Bang theory were true, it should be one of the most prevalent (common) particles in the universe. However, instead, it is the complete opposite – a magnetic monopole has never even been observed, not even once.

This is a serious problem because it means there is something entirely wrong with the Big Bang Theory because the total and absolute lack of even a single observed magnetic monopole particle is a direct contradiction to the fundamental principles of the Big Bang theory.


The Flatness Problem, Also Known As The Oldness Problem

The-Flatness-Problem-1

Why it’s a problem. The initial density of matter and energy in the universe is a very specific critical value. Small deviations from these values would have had massive effects on the nature of the universe at the current time.

If the universe started off slightly positively curved, it would be enormously positively curved today, and the same holds for negative curvature. However, the curvature of matter and energy in regards to density remains very small so the probability that a Big Bang could have occurred to create the current universe is so astronomically slim that it is entirely improbable.


We Should Be Able To See The Big Bang Or Shortly After Since The Further You Look The Farther Back In Time You See; But We Don’t

Why it’s a problem. This is my own idea that I just came up with (all the other ideas listed are well known and documented). As a result, this is the first time this problem will ever be posed (although I recognize the possibility that someone at some point may have posed the same or similar problem).

Essentially, the problem is that if the Big Bang occurred 13.7 billion years ago, then the deeper we peer into the universe, the closer to the Big Bang that we should see. However, no matter how deep we peer into space, still we see no evidence of a Big Bang.

A quick google search showed me that even in 2012 we have been able to see 13.2 billion light-years, which is seeing the equivalent of 13.2 billion years into the past. (We can probably see even farther now.)

However, since the Big Bang was supposed to occur only 13.7 billion years ago, then we should be looking at the early pre-formed universe. We shouldn’t see fully formed stars and planets. However, instead, we see stars and planets just like in our own galaxy. This is a serious problem for the Big Bang theory because we’re looking at the “early universe” yet it doesn’t appear very early at all. Thus, the Big Bang could not have happened.

Additionally, although this is in fact yet another issue (one that has been addressed before), if the universe happened totally randomly then there should be all kinds of different forms that we should see as we look out into space. It wouldn’t be the same planets, stars, and galaxies in every direction. Instead, it would be a vast array of different types of things. For example, in one direction we might see stars and galaxies but in another direction, we might see exotic forms. However, this is not the case, further disproving any Big Bang from ever happening.


Lack Of Universal Galactic Uniformity Contradicts The Fundamental Aspects Of The Big Bang Theory

Why it’s a problem. This is because of how the universe presently exists, galaxies are spread out in an uneven fashion, clumped together at certain points with big gaps and walls. However, due to the supposed age of 13.7 billion years, the universe has not yet had time for such walls and voids to form.

For a Big Bang to have occurred, galaxies would be perfectly evenly spread out. Thus, the lack of universal galactic uniformity contradicts the fundamental aspects of the Big Bang theory.


Dark Matter And Dark Energy

Why it’s a problem. Dark Matter and Dark Energy have never been proven, or observed in any way whatsoever, yet the Big Bang theory depends on the existence of such potentially mythological substances. Not only that, but in order for the Big Bang theory to even be valid, dark matter and dark energy would have to be the most abundant things in the universe.

The “dark” in “dark matter” and “dark energy” doesn’t mean color. It means, “unknown”. In other words, the proponents of the Big Bang theory couldn’t figure out how it could possibly happen so they said, let’s make up some fictional matter and energy that “made it happen”.

It’s kind of like me saying I am the most powerful person in the universe. My power is everywhere and can do everything! You just can’t see my power but it’s there! And then someone with common sense saying, pfft whatever man, yeah right.


The Theory Of Inflation Violates Einstein’s General Law Of Relativity

Why it’s a problem. Big Bang theorists have tried to use a magical effect called “inflation” to solve several of the obvious problems, including the Horizon Problem and the Flatness Problem.

The problem is, Inflation states that after the Big Bang, all the particles in the universe traveled faster than the speed of light. But Einstein’s General Law of Relativity proves that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

Inflation can effectively be called a “magical” effect because it does not hold any basis in science. Theorists made up this magical effect which says, essentially, that in some magical way everything traveled exponentially faster than the speed of light to get where it is after the supposed “Big Bang”.

In order for inflation to even begin to be a solution, all matter after the big bang would have to travel 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times faster than the speed of light. That is 1,650 zeros, or 101,649. There isn’t a name for this number, but for some perspective, there are only 1089 total particles in the entire observable universe.

Obviously, Inflation is impossible, because it violates Einstein’s General Law of Relativity, that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. You can’t use a false solution to answer problems.

It would be like you asking me, “I have three oranges and I add another orange. How many oranges do I have?”
And then me saying in response: “you now have 100 oranges”.
Then you ask, “how did you get 100 from 3 plus 1?”
And then I say, “well I wanted it to equal 100 oranges, so I made up this theory called Inflexion which means that due to a magical force that turns your fourth orange into 97 oranges, now you have 100 total oranges even though you only added one more.”

Well, you can’t argue that if I make up a magical term that turns one orange into 97 oranges then it doesn’t equal 100 oranges, because yes, 3 plus 97 equals 100. But Inflexion doesn’t exist, because I just made it up to get the result I wanted; so 3 oranges plus 1 orange always equals 4 oranges!

So then you tell me, “Ok ok smart guy, well now I have 5 oranges and I add 1 apple. How many oranges do I have?”
And then I reply: “100 oranges”.
And you say, “WTF?! How did you get 100 again?!”
So I say, “Well I still wanted 100 oranges so I made up another magical force called Inflapplexon that that turns 1 apple into 95 oranges when you add it to 5 existing oranges.”

Now you’re getting mad because I keep making up terms. But this is the same way that “Inflation” was created to solve the impossible problems.

The theorists wanted the end result to be the Big Bang, so they made up this magical term called “Inflation” and said, “ok this magical force caused the laws of physics to be broken so now the Big Bang works”.

Just like 5 oranges and 1 apple do not equal 100 oranges, General Relativity plus Inflation does not equal the Big Bang!

In summary, just like my magical forces “Inflexion” and “Inflapplexon”, Inflation also does not exist, because it defies the fundamental laws of physics.


The Big Bang Theory Violates The Second Law Of Thermodynamics

Why it’s a problem. The Second Law of Thermodynamics, also known as Entropy, states generally that all matter has a natural tendency to move to disorder.

However, for the Big Bang to have happened and created the whole universe as we know it, the opposite thing would have happened: all matter would have moved toward order. This is impossible.

According to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, if a Big Bang did happen, then even today all that would exist would be particles of all matter strewn evenly throughout the universe. It couldn’t have formed planets and complex laws of physics all out of nothing. To say it did you would have to say that the Second Law of Thermodynamics is false (which it isn’t so you can’t).


The Big Bang Theory Violates The First Law Of Thermodynamics

Why it’s a problem. The First Law of Thermodynamics states generally that matter cannot be created nor destroyed. This is a fundamental law of science that says that matter can only be converted into other matter or energy, but it cannot be created from nothing.

However, proponents of the Big Bang theory try to say that the universe was created out of nothing. Obviously, this is scientifically impossible.


2 Static Universe Models Fit Observational Data Better Than Expanding Universe Models

Why it’s a problem. Occam’s Razor states that that which has the fewest adjustable parameters should be chosen. However, the Big Bang theory opposes Occam’s Razor, because it can only exist with innumerable adjustable parameters.

Models of a Static Universe have far fewer adjustable parameters than expanding universe models. The Big Bang theory is an expanding universe model. Hence, according to Occam’s Razor you must choose a Static Universe model over the Big Bang’s Expanding Universe model.


The Horizon Problem

Why it’s a problem. The universe is too big to have formed in only 10-20 billion years as the Big Bang theory suggests since the Big Bang is theorized to have happened only about 13.7 billion years ago. This is because the speed of matter is limited by the speed of light.

The problem here is that if the Big Bang had occurred, firstly the universe is too large to have only happened 13.7 billion years ago, and secondly, there is temperature uniformity which requires matter to have moved beyond the speed of light to become universally uniform. This, of course, is impossible according to Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity because nothing can move faster than the speed of light.


You might be asking yourself, “well, is everybody wrong then?” Well yes, it’s entirely plausible that everyone can be wrong – at least, the few people in the educational establishment pushing these false and unfounded theories.

Today, ideas like The Big Bang are pushed so vehemently, especially in higher education, that anyone who questions its validity, even in light of the countless flaws of the Big Bang Theory, can be subject to intense criticism, be ostracized and face social rejection, be given failing grades, and even face expulsion from universities. Professional licenses can be revoked, you can be rejected from associations, lose your job, and worse. All because you went against the prevailing notions.

It’s not about what is true. It’s about what the educational and governing authorities say they want you to believe and say is true. As a result, almost all professors and scientists are too afraid of being ostracized from their communities and face losing their jobs to speak out against the prevailing notions.

This is why false ideas unsupported by science like the Big Bang theory and evolution are so pervasive. Most people believe what they are told without even bothering to research it for themselves, and the ones who are informed enough and think for themselves enough to question it are too afraid to say anything.

If you want to believe in the Big Bang theory, you must believe it in one of three ways: by faith, by ignorance, or by indoctrination. By faith, because you can’t believe something which does not have adequate scientific evidence except as a philosophical viewpoint.

By ignorance because the only way to be certain in your mind that the Big Bang theory could work is because you don’t have all the facts. Or if you have been so far indoctrinated you haven’t made a logical conclusion with your own rational mind, you may have never even tried to question what you have been told.

However, you must decide for yourself what you will believe. If you decide to believe in the Big Bang theory, that’s fine, just realize that since it is not supported by science, you have to believe it as a philosophical viewpoint, not as a scientific fact.

Previous articleHave Your Say
Next article1115 Days and Counting

15 COMMENTS

    • Hi ED,

      There is a reason it is called the Big Bang “Theory”, is that’s all it is a theory.

      In the infinite Cosmos, man understands about as much about the physical universe as my cat does about building and operating a carpet making machine, and all dependent processes of how the carpet came into existence. It does not however stopping him from scratching it and trying to “pick it to pieces” on a regular basis.

      Our knowledge let alone understanding is limited by our lack of science and technology. Mankind has not yet developed sufficient understanding of even basic communication and respect for others. So the chances of a more evolved species, that have solved problems of energy production and FTL (Faster Than Light) space travel, making first contact and showing us how things work, is very remote.

      It is quite probable that there are species out their that take their school 8th graders out on a week long multi light year trip to observe a nebula or birth of a star just as our children might go on a outdoors nature trip.

      And any passing species capable of powerful technology and warp speed will avoid this planet and first contact like the plague, as they will know that any technology we gain will just be used by the NWO, WEF, UN, WHO etc as further tools of oppression and starting wars.

      “Crew, avoid going anywhere near J276 (Earth). They are a primitive species, still wallowing in their own ego games, and petty squabbles. The puppeteers who manipulate the planet have the majority of the planet in a Borg like stance, courtesy of media brainwashing over some fictitious disease, which is just a reworked annual flu. The manipulators show a pattern of behaviour not unlike the Ferengi, and its rules of acquisition. Ferengi are known to not abide by intergalactic accords, so who knows, perhaps the Ferengi are running the puppet show down there.”

      If we want to advance as a species, we need to spend more time understanding “inner-space” before we spend time understanding outer-space. We need to come to terms with our own psyches, unconsciousness, egos, and shadows. If we cannot understand and gain control of ourselves, we have no show of understanding the cosmos.

      3

      0

  1. Academics and scientists have shown themselves to often be agenda driven activities. I no longer trust them.

    Dark matter is something they’ve never found but had to make up to validate gravitational theories.

    And men can’t have babies.

    4

    0

  2. Does half this shit in our solar system even exist?

    Its a legitimate question, how many of you have seen the furtherest reaches of space with your own eyes through a telescope?…. zero, we only know/think its there and believe this shit because big money projects have told us to believe it.

    Most of the stuff isnt even seen via an optical telescope but from radio signals pulsed into space. 99% of astronomy images are artistic impressions and the colours of it are all 100% guessed and made up.

    Question everything, nothing is ever as it seems. If billions of dollars of funding is on the line im sure most would fabricate a discovery or 2 to keep the gravy train going, its even easier when only 1 or 2 organisations in the world have the gear to fact check/ debunk the claims.

    I call BS to it all, these muppets just cant handle the fact that sometimes random shit happens that cant be explained. Besides none of this research is going to help or further mankind its all purely for ego.

    6

    0

      • Nor are a select few “scientists” and “experts”

        Reality is exactly that… reality, eyes, science, money and lies cant change it nothing can.

        Look at all the lies exposed that govt and science has fed us, then look at all the past claims made that we believe. Theres a good chance a large chunk of it is fabricated and never happened.

        We’re supposed to be living on the moon and colonising mars by now but man hasnt gone further then near earth orbit since the supposed moon landings.

        Decades ago satelites/cameras were sent to the end of our solar system but today we struggle to send space junk to our nearest planet? Open your mouth kea and get fed spoonfuls of bullshit.

        2

        0

        • We’re supposed to be living on the moon and colonising mars by now but man hasnt gone further then near earth orbit since the supposed moon landings.

          And according to an interview with a NASA expert by James May a few years back, the mission to Mars will be the first time man has left Low Earth Orbit. (LEO)

          And the several decades post moon mission discovery that space outside LEO is full of deadly Gamma radiation. As the NASA man said (or something similar) “It is only now that with the recent development of new alloys that we can attempt to leave LEO. Prior to now, leaving LEO would have required lead lined rockets with walls 18″ thick, a weight so heavy that the rocket could not take off. And without which the astronauts would be going to their certain death,” Together with instrument failures and trashed/saturated film negatives.

          Not even one radiation streak from the Gamma radiation in otherwise studio quality pictures, taken on the scientific equivalent of a box brownie camera. All in perfect focus and alignment despite no viewfinder, and no access to focus the camera because of where they were mounted. I think it is generally recognised that the moon missions were a “Wag the Dag” studio project, designed to show USA technology superiority during the cold war.

          And the discovery just a few years ago by NASA of a high speed electron Star Trek type Force Field that protects the earth, that the Apollo astronauts would have encountered upon their return, but didn’t.

          IAASB, do you ever get the feeling we are participants in a global Truman show?

          3

          0

Recent posts

Don’t Poke The Russian Bear

Russian forces start shelling Kyiv Military correspondent Cossack Colonel Yuri Kominyenko In response to the shelling of civilians in the liberated city of Donetsk, the RF...

When Is It Not A Scam?

This was in my Junk box. I feel blessed to get two in one day. Greetings to you, How are you doing today? However, it...

Yet Another Covid “Conspiracy Theory”

Yet Another Covid “Conspiracy Theory” Confirmed As True Written by JD Rucker This isn’t new information to those who have been paying close attention, but the...

Recent comments

Kea on Have Your Say
Kea on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

Hamilton
overcast clouds
7.2 ° C
8.3 °
6.8 °
97 %
1.3kmh
100 %
Mon
8 °
Tue
13 °
Wed
14 °
Thu
14 °
Fri
11 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.5692
EUR
1.6538
AUD
1.1090
CAD
1.2274
GBP
1.9434
JPY
0.0117
CNY
0.2338
INR
0.0201