Home Uncategorised Sir David – I question your objectivity

Sir David – I question your objectivity

Author

Date

Category

So, the venerable national treasure Sir David Attenborough was back on our screen, predicting total catastrophe if we humans fail to act on Climate Change. He gave us all the usual warnings – “right now we are facing our greatest threat in thousands of years – climate change” and “there isn’t much time left”and “the science is clear that urgent action is needed” and of course “we are facing a man-made disaster on a global scale”. But these predictions of total climate catastrophe have a long and not very honourable history.

The prophets of doom?

In 1982, the UN announced a two-decade tipping point for action on environmental issues. Mostafa Tolba, executive director of the UN Environment Program (UNEP), warned on May 11, 1982, that the “world faces an ecological disaster as final as nuclear war within a couple of decades unless governments act now.” According to Tolba, lack of action would bring “by the turn of the century, an environmental catastrophe which will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible as any nuclear holocaust.

So, according to this (IMHO) useless parasitic buffoon, by 2002 we should have been deep in climate doodoo.

In 1989, the UN was still trying to sell “a coming climate catastrophe” to the public. In July 1989,  Noel Brown, the then-director of the New York office of UNEP was warning of a “10-year window of opportunity to solve” global warming. According to the article: “A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos.”

So, we should have seen this disaster scenario by 2002, about 17 years ago. I’m still waiting.

By 2006 the situation was apparently becoming critical as Al Gore explained in his fantasy film “An Inconvenient Truth”. According to Gore we had just 10 years left to save the planet.

But in 2007, seven years after that supposed 2002 climate catastrophe hadn’t happened, Rajendra Pachauri, then the extremely well-paid chief of the UN IPPC, declared 2012 the climate deadline by which it was imperative to act: “If there’s no action before 2012, that’s too late. What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future. This is the defining moment.”

In 2009 our very own jet-setting multi-millionaire Prince Charles was apparently also an expert on climatology just like jet-setting multi-millionaire Al Gore. Jet-setting multi-millionaire Charles originally announced in March 2009 that we had “less than 100 months to alter our behavior before we risk catastrophic climate change.”

Later that year, at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in 2009, Al Gore sought UN climate agreement immediately. “We have to do it this year. Not next year, this year,” he demanded. “And of course the clock is ticking because Mother Nature does not do bailouts.”

Sounds familiar?

In fact 2009 seems to have been a popular year for climate catastrophe predictions. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon announced his own deadline in August 2009, when he warned of “incalculable” suffering without a UN climate deal in December 2009.

At the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in 2009, Prince Charles jetted in with the usual retinue of flunkies to warn us: “The grim reality is that our planet has reached a point of crisis and we have only seven years before we lose the levers of control.”

In 2010, the Prince of Wales said, “Ladies and gentlemen we now have only 86 months left before we reach the tipping point.”

But in 2012, the UN gave Planet Earth another four-year reprieve. UN Foundation president and former U.S. Senator Tim Wirth called Obama’s re-election the “last window of opportunity” to get it right on climate change.

By 2014, a clearly frustrated Prince Charles seemed to abandon the countdown, announcing, “We are running out of time. How many times have I found myself saying this over recent years?

In 2017, Prince Charles’s one-hundred-month deadline finally expired. What did Charles have to say? Was he giving up? Did he proclaim the end times for the planet? Far from it. Two years earlier, in 2015, Prince Charles abandoned his hundred-month countdown and generously gave the world a reprieve by extending his climate tipping point another thirty-five years, to the year 2050! In a July 2015 interview “His Royal Highness warns that we have just 35 years to save the planet from catastrophic climate change.” So, instead of facing the expiration of his climate catastrophe deadline head on, the sixty-nine-year-old Charles kicked the climate doomsday deadline down the road until 2050 when he would be turning the ripe age of 102 and thus probably wouldn’t be around to see that his prediction was total bollox

And we mustn’t forget top UK scientist Sir David King who warned in 2004 that that by 2100 Antarctica could be the only habitable continent. Like Charles, Sir David won’t be around in 2100 making his prediction extremely convenient for him and his career.

The above is just a small selection of warnings from Climate Change doom-mongers.

Sir David – will you dare tell the truth?

When I heard that the great Sir David would be doing his bit for Climate Change, I wondered if he would dare deal with the following issues:

  • why were most scientists predicting a new Ice Age in the 1970s which would lead to crop failure, starvation and a mass movement of millions of people from the freezing North southwards?
  • why have all the previous predictions of Climate Armageddon been total rubbish?
  • why haven’t the Himalayan glaciers disappeared as was predicted by the IPCC?
  • why was the Arctic not ice-free by the summer of 2013 as was predicted by the IPCC in 2007 – a claim parrotted by loads of politicians?
  • why have the Warmies felt the need to fiddle the figures and falsify the data for decades?
  • why does he appear to accept the “97% of scientists” claim when we now know it was based on massive manipulation of the data? (I have explained how this was done in a previous blog)
  • will he face up to the fact that the main problem facing mankind is not from the West with its declining population and reducing use of fossil fuels, but from explosive population growth in Africa where the population doubles every 22 years?

But Sir David’s programme avoided mentioning any of the above issues. Instead it just produced the usual turgid pile of foul-smelling BBC Warming propaganda with loads of fancy camera work to frighten the shallow snowflakes who apparently subscribe to the new Man-Made Global Warming religion. Even worse, the programme featured people whose work on climate has been totally and comprehensively discredited, but didn’t feature anyone who was critical of the Man-Made Global Warming group-think.

But perhaps the most disturbing part of Sir David’s programme was that the only temperature chart it used (if I remember correctly) was the one starting in 1850 which shows considerable warming. Had Sir David’s programme used the chart of the Earth’s temperature over the last 100,000 years or over the last 415,000 years, we would have seen that today’s warming is just part of a regular cycle and is nothing out of the ordinary. All very odd, don’t you think?

Silly old fool should STFU and retire.

Previous articleStupid Butt-Hurt Millennials
Next articleHave Your Say

10 COMMENTS

  1. I’ve never believed in this climate change bullshit. It’s all propaganda designed to undermine western countries’ freedoms. Big oil, air travel, tourism, meat consumption, and lots of cheap Chinese goods on the Warehouse shelves, transported thousands of kilometres via fossil-fuel powered giant ships to a store near you, aren’t going ANYWHERE.

    Oh how frustrating it must be that some of us (most of us) just won’t buy the crap they’re trying to sell us. Ever.

    0

    0

  2. Comrade,
    just open your wallet and shut up.
    actually, we can just help ourselves to bank account.. so just shut up.

    That is all plebs, back to work.

    0

    0

    • The papal indulgences are back! I mean carbon offsets. The type James Shaw buys to ease his conscience when he flies everywhere to go on his frequent junkets.

      0

      0

  3. Yes, you’ve only quoted a small sample of ‘projections’. Climate Scientology doesn’t do predictions, it does projections. Probably because their ability to predict has been so dismal. However, a science that is not predictive is like phrenology (a former recognised science but discredited over a century ago).

    Attenborough many moons ago along with his colleague Sir David Bellamy rejected the man made climate catastrophic belief system. Unlike Bellamy, however, Attenborough changed his religion quite quickly.

    The comparison between their respective careers could not be more pronounced. Bellamy’s public career nose-dived. Attenborough’s career went from strength to strength. Strangely, now that Bellamy has bent the knee he is now once more featured prominently; his career is no longer stagnant. It’s amazing how that happened…

    0

    0

  4. Given that climate on Earth has changed many times before humans or fossil fuel use the most obvious common factor is the Sun and its changes of output periodically, humans may have had some effect. The most pragmatic course is to adapt to changes whilst research continues, either way we will survive and mitigate human causation if proved.

    0

    0

    • I think you’ll find Milankovitch Cycles are a tad more reliable. Basically our elliptical orbit changes around the sun, a changing axis tilt and elliptical shape changes provide a better explanation than climate scientology.

      For example, climate scientology projects less ice at Antarctica as well as the Arctic. Milankovitch Cycles would predict that usually when the Northern Hemisphere (the Hemisphere with the most landmass) is in an interglacial, the Arctic will shrink but the Antarctic will grow (under most scenarios). So far, Milankovitch Cycles are more reliable…because the Antarctic continues to gain more ice.

      (Yes, I’m aware of the various crap press releases that say the opposite of reality at the Antarctic).

      Depending on the axial tilt and if orbital change is more circular than ellipitical then both the Arctic and Antarctic may shrink together for Milankovitch Cycles.

      0

      0

      • I should further say, our current elliptical orbit around the sun has the Northern Hemisphere having a short winter, ergo interglacial. Correspondingly, the Southern Hemisphere has a longer winter. Ergo, the ice increases at the Antarctic. It is rather boringly obvious.

        0

        0

  5. And they wonder why kids don’t think that life is worth living or having children going forward. Is it only white people that believe the narrative? Other peoples don’t seem to care about their kids then and are more likely to be the source of the problem?

    0

    0

  6. yes the Climate Change mantra is getting louder and louder.
    I dont belive it.
    It used to be Global Warming
    But I do think the over population in poor countries is a much bigger problem.
    Nigeria, Niger, Egypt, Pakistan, indonesia, China, India, Uganda are all over populated.
    They will cause more attempted mass migration and more pollution once they all get cars and fridges etc
    No one mentions this in the MSM

    0

    0

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

Flying Cars

Japan May Have Flying Cars In Three Years A Japanese tech startup, the Tokyo-based company SkyDrive, now says it plans to launch the first commercial...

Is Your Password Secure?

A computer can guess more than 100,000,000,000 passwords per second. Still think yours is secure? By Paul Haskell-Dowland, Associate Dean (Computing and Security), Edith Cowan...

Recent comments

Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Braybots nemesis on Have Your Say
Braybots nemesis on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
Braybots nemesis on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

Hamilton
clear sky
10.6 ° C
10.6 °
10.6 °
71 %
3.6kmh
3 %
Fri
13 °
Sat
15 °
Sun
16 °
Mon
16 °
Tue
16 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.4751
EUR
1.7493
AUD
1.0775
CAD
1.1208
GBP
1.9160
JPY
0.0141
CNY
0.2183
INR
0.0201