The women will not be allowed out of the house at all then. It might liberate some though, I think that is a positive use of an executive decision.

Not just a benign personal clothing choice when countries are banning them as terrorist garb. Not simply a symbol of the “religion of peace”. Why do they call Islam peaceful? It certainly doesn’t stand up to scruitiny.

An interesting article of a conference in Sydney and was just going to post on “have your say” but sort of fits in here. If the burka fits they can wear it.

Mr Doureihi repeatedly refused to condemn ISIS in an ABC Lateline interview.

On Saturday night, he likened denouncing the Islamic State terror group to being asked to disown paedophilia.

‘Imagine someone comes into the room and looks at us both. Looks at us both and says these two are a bunch of paedophiles,’ he said.

‘And they come up on stage and they say, “Do you condemn paedophilia?”

‘Would I actually respect that question and give a yes or a no? Why would I do that?

‘Why would I humiliate myself and accept to be framed in this way?’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6966531/Radical-Muslim-group-Hizb-ut-Tahrir-bans-media-Unapologetically-Muslim-conference-Sydney.html

“Framed in this way” as you have your woman framed in the burkas and niqabs and the liberties that Mohammad took with the young.

An interesting back ground of the muslim community in Sydney, and Australians showing a lot of tolerance of the intolerant, which will lead to their downfall.

I’ve always thought that if the women have to cover themselves head to toe lest they get savaged by predators, what does that say about their culture in general? I’ll pass thanks.

Dear Leader Absoludly, posidivly rejects this knee-jerk assault on the rights of innocent, law abiding women – who dindunuffin – to wear clothing that they choose. How dare the patriarchy, at the stroke of a pen, make thousands of women into criminals overnight!
Surgeons have been called to un-furrow dear leaders brow.

that is all plebs, back to work.

Dear Leader is still trying to figure out her next move. To hijab or not to hijab, that is the question?! ?

Fucking Awesome! About time decent people stood up to these Ragheads and their fucked up extremism. But will Saint Hijab Jacinda follow suit?

Some where in India, very young girls are so “encouraged” to be ‘hijabed’.

https://twitter.com/TarekFatah/status/1122671912033894401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1122671912033894401&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fsheikyermami.com%2F

Interesting comments flow on, where you may learn of stronger commands.

In Minnesota, where the shining example of one Congress woman.

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1122253351448502272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1122253351448502272&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fsheikyermami.com%2F

Would it be considered that these young ‘hijabed’ girls are ready to breed, as even Saudi Arabia does not enforce girls into hijab until puberty, about 13+

Again interesting comments.

I have read some of Nicolai Sennels a dutch psychologist, and will put this whole quote, as it is a bit hard to get back to the source.

Dutch Researcher: “The Better Integrated, The Higher the Risk of Radicalization”

By Nicolai Sennels

Muslims are not radicalized by poverty, racism or lack of integration. Muslims are radicalized by Islam. The fact is that Islam is the only religion where its followers become more violent, the more they follow their religion.

Translated by Thomas from Standaard:

“The better integrated, the higher the risk of radicalization.

Author: Dr. Marion van San, Senior Researcher at RISBO, an independent research institute, active in the field of learning and society that is affiliated with the Faculty of Social Sciences at Erasmus University Rotterdam. Since 2009 she has conducted ethnographic studies of families of radicalizing youths.

Since we know that many young people left Belgium, but also from other European countries, to join the armed conflict in Syria, a fierce debate has erupted. However, the debate as conducted in Belgium is permeated by a series of stereotypes, that are not consistent with what is known from international literature, and that block a proper analysis of the phenomenon.

That young people from Europe who leave for Syria are victims of a society that does not accept them, and does not offer them sufficient opportunities — a proposition that Rik Coolsaet has supported in an earlier edition of this newspaper — is however not supported by empirical evidence.

[…]

[…] the children and grandchildren of immigrants, who were born and raised here, focus heavily on Belgian society. They seek social acceptance and mobility, and do everything possible to integrate. The result is that they have higher social expectations than others and are often more sensitive to exclusion and (alleged) discrimination. Negative experiences can turn them away from society and cause them to seek refuge in a deviant group identity.

I therefore dare say that the better young people are integrated, the greater the chance is that they radicalize. This hypothesis is supported by a lot of evidence.

[If they attend universities, they are also subjected to a lot of hard-left race indoctrination, which heightens their resentment. “You are a victim of racism, you are the downtrodden ‘Other,’ whites are privileged in ways that you are not, etc. etc. ad nauseam. — PW]

so just who makes them into being the “special people” with such big expectations with “they are us” that is until ‘we become them’? That also seems to be happening in a different set up here in NZ.
Nicolai Sennels used to work for the Danish government, but became black listed with what he realized in studying the differences of inmates in jail and then speaking out.

Yes, the more countires that ban the burka (letter box) and the hijab the better.
It is not only ridiculous to look at
But it shows how evil islam is.
Its all about tribal male domination and trying to take over the world.