There is one discordant note in this Sky News weeper about the supposedly inhuman conditions that Muslim migrant welfare recipients are being forced to endure in Britain: “She even said it was worse than when she lived in a ‘normal house’ in Eritrea and Sudan.”
Indeed. And there’s the rub. The British government had no obligation to take her in and give her a home, but it did. Children’s Commissioner Anne Longfield said: “Something has gone very wrong with our housing system when children are growing up in B&Bs, shipping containers and old office blocks.”
Maybe. Or maybe it’s a problem with Britain’s immigration policies.
Meanwhile, Lulu Abubaker, complains bitterly about her accommodations, and clearly thinks the British authorities should provide her with better housing. Why does she have such a sense of entitlement? One reason may be because non-Muslims paying for the upkeep of Muslims is a Qur’anic dictate:
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).
The caliph Umar said the jizya payments from the dhimmis were the source of the Muslims’ livelihood:
Lulu and her family live in a former shipping container in Ealing. She says that it is not fit for humans to live in.
Thousands of children are being “robbed” of a decent childhood by growing up in converted shipping containers and office blocks, say campaigners.
There may be more than 210,000 children without a permanent home in England, according to the Bleak Houses report by the Children’s Commissioner for England.
It comes amid a rise in the use of converted office blocks and shipping containers as temporary accommodation, which the commissioner warned are frequently not fit to live in.
Ealing Council is one of those using “heavily modified” shipping containers to house people in west London.
The steel containers, which have a kitchenette, shower room and bedroom, become home for people who may otherwise be in B&Bs or other interim housing.
The council says they are “innovative” and provide a “stable, comfortable environment for vulnerable homeless families”….
The slums abound, and their own occupants go back to Crapland as it’s safer than London because of their own gang problems. It’s a cutlery epidemic.
Do you think that she will be on a benefit that she could not get at home?
Of course. No reason why the ships that rescue ‘refugees’ from the high seas, or is that actual countries shores shouldn’t back load and take disappointed people back home. What do the travel brochures promise refugees?
She would have been on council benefits, council housing (read British equivalent of a state house).
Trust me, a large percentage of the UK will be happy to see her go back to her Sudanese refugee camp!
Should she be paid it to go home? A bit like being paid to not plant crops? That was the US I think.
Ahhh, come to beautiful Italy, where Africa awaits you!