Home Human Stupidity Tesla driver busted driving 93 MPH in Autopilot

Tesla driver busted driving 93 MPH in Autopilot

Author

Date

Category

Tesla driver busted driving 93 MPH in Autopilot while fully reclined and sound asleep

Police in Canada have filed charges against a Tesla driver who they pulled over driving at 93 miles per hour while he was asleep at the wheel of his car and the seat was pulled down like a bed.

Officers with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were notified that a vehicle was speeding down Highway 2 near Ponoka at about 4 p.m. on Thursday, July 9.

“Sure enough, a short time later the Tesla goes by. The officer was sitting in the center median and he too was like, ‘Noooo,’” Alberta RCMP Sgt. Darrin Turnbull said.

The vehicle was a 2019 Tesla Model S that appeared to be propelling itself at a speed of over 86 mph (140 km/h) with “both seats completely reclined” and “both occupants appearing to be asleep,” reports Canada’s Global News.

The officer began his pursuit of the car with sirens blaring and lights flashing in an attempt to halt the car, which instead began slightly accelerating.

“The officer was able to obtain radar readings on the vehicle, confirming that it had automatically accelerated up to exactly 150 km/h (93 mph),” RCMP said.

Eventually, the driver woke from his slumber and prevented the high-speed chase from continuing.

“He gets up closer to the vehicle and hits the siren, and it’s at that point he can see the driver pop up and pull over,” Sgt. Turnbull added.

The motorist, a 21-year-old male from British Colombia, was charged with speeding and driving while fatigued, resulting in his license being automatically suspended for 24 hours. He was later charged with dangerous driving.

“The decision was made that, no, this is a marked departure from the norm,” Turnbull said.

While the 2019 Tesla didn’t appear to be outfitted with the company’s autopilot feature, many of Tesla’s vehicles come equipped with relatively advanced driver-assist programs.

Tesla is one of a growing number of companies that have sought to rethink transportation and further develop self-driving and autonomous vehicle services. The extension of an unmanned or automated model to commercial delivery services, for example, would drastically boost profitability and reduce labor costs by eliminating human drivers in favor of a driverless model.

While not entirely intended to enable driverless transportation, the “Autopilot” system touted by Tesla offers a suite of advanced driver assistance features including lane centering and semi-automated highway navigation. The Level 2 partially autonomous system also includes adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist, self-parking, as well as the ability to automatically change lanes. Tesla Autopilot-enabled cars use a variety of sensors, up to eight cameras, radar and ultrasonic to automate these tasks.

While these impressive features efficiently reduce the amount of input required by human motorists, drivers are still expected to remain engaged with the vehicle to ensure its safe operation.

However, over the past years traffic investigators have found that the Autopilot system contributed to fatal crashes, resulting in lawsuits against Tesla for wrongful death.

In one case, a Tesla driver in Los Angeles was found to be eating and drinking coffee immediately before crashing his Tesla Model S into a fire truck. Another Tesla driver in North Carolina was enjoying a movie on his phone when his car narrowly avoided crashing into one police cruiser before slamming into two more, while still another Tesla motorist was entertaining himself with a videogame before dying in a fatal crash.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has blamed the crashes on drivers being overconfident and complacent and, essentially, failing to read the fine print of the “Autopilot” system. Critics, however, charge the tech tycoon with encouraging driver inattention by touting the system as mostly automated.

While there haven’t been any similar incidents involving self-driving cars in Canada, pilot programs for autonomous cars have been introduced in Ontario and Quebec, with the requirement that “safety drivers” are always on hand to wrest control of the vehicle to prevent a tragedy.

“It’s definitely a new thing, which unfortunately we might see more often,” Turnbull said.

The motorist must appear before court in December.

“Although manufacturers of new vehicles have built in safeguards to prevent drivers from taking advantage of the new safety systems in vehicles, those systems are just that — supplemental safety systems,” Alberta RCMP Traffic Services Superintendent Gary Graham said in a statement“They are not self-driving systems, they still come with the responsibility of driving.”

Previous articleCindy will be pissed.
Next articleNo lockdown in Sweden

6 COMMENTS

  1. I’m calling B/S on this story ,there’s no way the computers on board the car would allow it to be driven whilst the seats are fully reclined….

    2

    0

    • And as a Tesla owner I know you have to apply slight turning pressure to the steering wheel approx every 90 seconds

      2

      0

  2. Tesla cars should have a big “I’m a dick” button on the back bumper that the cops could nudge with their cop car to disengage the auto drive function.
    Or they could just drive along side and fire a round thru the side windows of the car! That’ll wake them up and cost a fortune to replace. Explain that to the insurance company!

    4

    0

  3. In a similar vein (and perhaps ‘Only in America’), but concerning Winnebago (The US ‘Mobile Home’ manufacturer). Many years ago, a brand-new Winnie left the highway at speed, causing severe damage to both itself and the driver. A multi-million dollar court case resulted with the owner of the vehicle claiming that Winne had misrepresented the vehicle’s capabilities. It transpired that, believing ‘Cruise Control’ meant that the vehicle was ‘self-navigating’ and would follow whatever road it was on without his ‘interference’, the new owner had vacated his seat and gone to the rear of the vehicle to make himself a cup of coffee. The fact that the vehicle was travelling at approximately 60 mph when he did so was a mere and minor detail. Unsurprisingly, the Winnie left the freeway at speed. As already noted, the owner had believed that the manufacturer had misrepresented the vehicle’s capabilities, hence the litigation.. Winnebago settled for a very substantial amount…

    ‘Only in America’? Perhaps not…

    2

    0

    • That is a hell of a good lawyer/attorney.
      To represent this idiot then actually get payout for said idiot.

      I guess said idiot would have been a bit bruised if bouncing around inside the shell of an RV.
      Oh well, only 50% of people are at or above average intelligent.
      The rest, well…

      Get the name of that lawyer for future reference, and the name of the Winne lawyer and never ever use the latter.

      With this zero tolerance stuff I was using cruise control last week on the open road.
      Interesting in NZ.
      I have decent radar detector – what I call ‘the arsehole detector ‘

      In 90 km from central Akl to the split of the No 2 and no 25 to the Coromandel I was pinged 6 times.
      I was set on 100.
      Another 4 in the next 350 km.
      It was interesting from Taihape to Wellington that I was was being passed and after 100 km I moved into line with other traffic which was at avg 107 km/hr
      I detected no arseholes from Taihape to Wellington but 2 from the Pram to Wgtn.
      So, ping the Northerners for revenue – on top of the extra 6c per litre but leave the public servants alone.
      Mmmm.

      I am unsure if the rule that was brought out in 1993 with speed cameras still applies.
      That is: they will only ticket the top 15% of the traffic flow so if average is high then tolerance is higher.
      Does anyone here know?
      I suspect given the arseholes nature of these critters then such offering has been withdrawn in the name of revenue.

      Interesting when I was in Australia last year and dong some mileage .
      I inquired about radar detector use.
      The only state it is allowed is WA.
      On the Eastern seaboard it is illegal to even have one in the car- even wrapped up in a box.

      3

      0

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

First sale on internet?

The First Thing Sold On The Internet Was A Bag Of Weed Several researchers have pointed to a drug deal that took place in 1971...

BIG TECH VS THE PRESIDENT

BIG TECH VS THE PRESIDENT Joe Biden used his addict son to feed his greed. It takes a sick bastard to pull that off. How astonishing...

Good on him

Genius 12 Year Old Boy On Way To Receive Aerospace Engineering Degree Justin MacLachlan: Twelve-year-old Caleb Anderson knew sign language by the time he was only...

Recent comments

Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say
Artimus Pyle on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
rightoverlabour on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say
rightoverlabour on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

Hamilton
broken clouds
17.2 ° C
17.8 °
16.7 °
88 %
1.3kmh
74 %
Tue
16 °
Wed
17 °
Thu
19 °
Fri
19 °
Sat
21 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.4948
EUR
1.7660
AUD
1.0654
CAD
1.1334
GBP
1.9467
JPY
0.0143
CNY
0.2227
INR
0.0203