Home Uncategorized The battle for free speech is on as Big Tech cracks down...

The battle for free speech is on as Big Tech cracks down on conservatives on social media.

Author

Date

Category

Jenna Ellis writes

The battle for free speech on the internet is heating up and one thing is clear: Big Tech will bend to criticism from the left, but not the right.

The reason is simple. Silicon Valley does not fear any consequences from conservatives, who are instinctually prone to letting private companies do as they please.

Meanwhile, because of the leftist inclinations of their own employees and their need to maintain a healthy relationship with their Democratic political protectors in Washington, the Big Tech companies are terrified of defying the activist left.

We are in the midst of an extensive crackdown on conservative speech by Facebook, Twitter, and Google’s YouTube. YouTube, for example is “demonetizing” and banning channels at an unprecedented rate, and in a complete reversal of its founding ethos, is also totally overhauling it’s policies to replace an emphasis on free speech with one on preventing “hateful content.”

The most immediate cause is direct pressure from left-wing activists who characterize their explicit efforts to deplatform the right as “journalism.” The YouTube policy changes, for instance, came in response to a coordinated media blitz over conservative comedian Steven Crowder making fun of Vox reporter Carlos Maza.

This network of activist-journalists works closely with groups like the Antifa gangsters who savagely beat Quillette editor Andy Ngo in Portland this weekend. After Ngo was attacked, some of these “journalists” mocked him and tried to justify his beating. Others, including Maza himself, have explicitly and publicly endorsed these violent tactics.

Yet, none of these leftist activists face censorship from Big Tech. In fact, the researcher who exposed their links to Antifa was himself banned from Twitter for doing so.

But now there’s a new dynamic at work. The federal government has begun making the long-awaited opening moves toward the most significant government action ever aimed at Silicon Valley, and Big Tech is paying attention.

The Federal Trade Commission is opening an antitrust investigation into Facebook, and the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division is about to do the same for Google, but that’s not the end of Big Tech’s woes. Somewhere between 12 and 20 state attorneys general are reportedly prepping their own coordinated investigations into Big Tech’s anti-competitive practices and possible violations of state consumer protection laws.

The latest wave of censorship, unfortunately, shows that when Big Tech companies are under pressure, their instinct is to veer further left.

Even with the U.S. Department of Justice and top state law enforcers opening investigations, Silicon Valley remains far more responsive to the threats of Democrats, who are signalling that their own House Judiciary Committee investigation will be framed as a push towards more censorship, not less.

Representative Frank Pallone (D – NJ), who will be among the most prominent Democrats at the upcoming hearings, has already issued a threatening tweet urging more aggressive social media moderation beyond the censorship of conservatives that is already underway.

The last time Facebook executives appeared before her Senate committee, Senator Mazie Hirono (D – HI) similarly made it clear that she thinks the problem with social media is too little censorship, not too much.

Unfortunately, that’s the message Big Tech is responding to, egged on by a liberal press eager to silence competing sources of information. The New York Times, for example, ran a Sunday cover story last month about how YouTube turned a young man into a neo-Nazi, ostensibly through no fault of his own, by allowing voices such as Jordan Peterson and Lauren Southern on its platform.

This was always the activist left’s plan. Shortly after the 2016 election, Media Matters for America leader David Brock produced a memo explicitly calling for pressure on social media companies to deplatform conservatives in hopes that this would prevent a repeat of Trump’s upset victory. Thanks to reporting from Breitbart News and an undercover investigation by Project Veritas, we now know that senior elements within Google share the same goal.

The tide can still be turned, though. If the avalanche of antitrust investigations is not enough to convince Big Tech to clean up its act, then conservatives and elected Republicans will have to take an even stronger stand against biased censorship of the modern public square.

The quicker we all abandon these big tech companies the better it will be for free speech. Even here in NZ ,with Cindy and Zuck being bestest mates, the chances of them getting away with all this crap are higher than you might think.

7 COMMENTS

  1. Court rules Donald Trump violated US Constitution by blocking people who disagreed with him on Twitter

    President Donald Trump violated the US Constitution by blocking people whose views he disliked from his Twitter account, a federal appeals court has ruled.

    In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan says the First Amendment forbids Trump from using Twitter’s “blocking” function to limit access to his account, which has 61.8 million followers.

    “The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilises a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,” Circuit Judge Barrington Parker wrote, citing several Supreme Court decisions.

    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2019/07/court-rules-donald-trump-violated-us-constitution-by-blocking-people-who-disagreed-with-him-on-twitter.html?fbclid=IwAR0KieWWrpcj4DIL13XhSrOk2JXTosBJCz1kyXXWmb0cS_q9dL-twlN6H4g

    Now how funny ios that.
    These guys are essentially saying that Trump can’t block out hate speech, which of course is exactly what everyone else is trying to do.

    Couldn’t make this shit up.

    0

    0

  2. The basic argument is that these social media platforms are either platforms or publications but not both.

    Either they’re like the phone service where anyone can use it and the supplier is not held accountable for any ill carried out on their service (i.e. a platform) or they’re responsible for potential defamation, copyright infringement, patent infringement, trademark infringements, libel, slander, anyone’s call for violence etc. At the moment, Big Tech is pretending they can be both: getting the protection of being a platform but able to censor as they damn well please.

    The outcome will have huge implications either way.

    0

    0

Recent posts

Common Sense Reigns In Missouri

Missouri Governor Pardons McCloskey’s on Bogus Weapons Charges Missouri Governor Mike Parson pardoned Mark and Patricia McCloskey on Tuesday from the bogus charges issued against them by...

Good If You Can Find It

Massive Star Sapphire Cluster Worth $100 Million Found In Sri Lanka Workers digging a well in the backyard of a home in Sri Lanka unearthed...

Twitter Strikes Again

Science Writer Suspended From Twitter For Quoting Results Of Pfizer Clinical Trial Chris Menahan Twitter suspended the account of science writer and former New York Times...

Little People Strike Back

https://www.bitchute.com/video/euMT6jUwXhym/ CANADIAN COURT VICTORY PROVES COVID-19 IS A HOAX & ALL RESTRICTIONS HAVE NOW BEEN DROPPED Thanks to Braybots nemesis for posting this link yesterday. Send...

Recent comments

howitis on Have Your Say
revtech120 on Have Your Say
howitis on Have Your Say
revtech120 on Have Your Say
howitis on Have Your Say
howitis on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

Hamilton
overcast clouds
10.6 ° C
12 °
10.1 °
93 %
0.9kmh
100 %
Thu
12 °
Fri
13 °
Sat
14 °
Sun
12 °
Mon
9 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.4163
EUR
1.6770
AUD
1.0492
CAD
1.1335
GBP
1.9727
JPY
0.0129
CNY
0.2192
INR
0.0191