Home Chinese Virus The CDC Knew Vaccines Were Unsafe, But Said NOTHING

The CDC Knew Vaccines Were Unsafe, But Said NOTHING




The CDC knew in January 2021 that the vaccines were unsafe, but they said NOTHING

Steve Kirsch

The data was in public view in January 2021 that the vaccines were too unsafe for use in humans. By February, it was even more obvious. To this day, the CDC has never acknowledged this safety signal.

Remember Sgt. Schultz on Hogan’s Heroes? “I know nothing, nothing!” was his iconic line

Why is this relevant today? Because this is exactly how the CDC and FDA react when they see a safety signal. It is almost “as if” they had all been trained by Sgt. Schultz himself.

This morning I wondered to myself, “How early did they know?”

To find out, I did a few queries on the VAERS system.

It turns out that they knew in January 2021, as soon as the vaccines rolled out it was unsafe and they didn’t tell anyone.

And by February 2021, it was even more obvious. The data was in plain sight the entire time. It was in the primary database they look at for spotting safety signals: VAERS. It couldn’t have been more obvious. This is the database they were watching like a hawk. They said that.

And there is no way to sugar coat this data. There is no way to explain away this data.

So what they did is they pretended it didn’t exist and they said nothing, nothing. Just like Sergeant Schultz taught them.

And you couldn’t even bring any of this to their attention. I tried desperately to reach out to Steven A. Anderson at the FDA who said on video that he was the top safety signals guy at the FDA and he refused to acknowledge all of my calls and emails when I tried to bring the safety data to his attention. He just ignored me. He still does today. He’s about as corrupt as they get.

The VAERS data that was in plain sight in January

Here’s the VAERS data from January for US States only for just one life threatening symptom: pulmonary embolism (PE). PE is a blood clot affecting the blood supply to your lungs; it is like a heart attack on your lungs. If the blood supply is cut off, your lungs die and if your lungs die, you die. It’s that simple. You don’t need to be a doctor to understand how serious this is.

This is the VAERS data in just one month at the very start of the rollout:

By February it was even worse.

Here is January and February combined:

Normal reporting rates for PE are over 1,000 times lower!

Now let’s compare that to what are normal reporting rates for PE in VAERS.

Note that these events were happening in all age groups even though as we all know, the vaccines in the early months were all skewed to the elderly. So the numbers are even more troubling for those <65.

Let’s look at 5 years of data for all vaccines:

See the difference? That’s 5 years of data, not one month!

So the rate of PE on average is .21 cases reported to VAERS per month.

The rate of PE for 17-43 year olds is .03 cases reported to VAERS per month.

The rate of PE for 44-64 year olds is .05 cases reported to VAERS per month.

The COVID vaccines have rates of PE over 1,000 times normal in all age ranges and we had that data in January 2021

So how elevated are the COVID vaccine rates? To do a proper analysis, we should know the age breakdowns for the vaccines, so this is just an approximation. The approximation shows that the more accurate numbers will be worse for those under 65 since the vaccine rollout was heavily skewed to the elderly.

Here are the numbers for Jan:

Overall: 256/.21=1,219

17-43: 53/.03=1,766

44-64: 74/.05=1,480

Here are the averages for Jan-Feb relative to the normal rates:

Overall: 685/.42=1,630

17-43: 90/.06=1,500

44-64: 173/.1=1,730

The data for the entire period is just as troubling

Since I don’t want to be accused of cherry picking, here’s the PE data for 2021:


for 44 to 64 year olds, it is 1113/.6=1,855

Again, this is a signal it is impossible not to see. So the rates weren’t an artifact of the choice of dates.

There is no way to explain away this signal

You cannot explain away a >1,000-fold rate increase in a serious (potentially fatal) adverse event. You can bring in all the fact checkers you want and you can’t explain it.

If you want to talk about correlation vs. causality, great. If it wasn’t the vaccine causing the spike in reports, explain to us what caused the spike. Make my day. Funny how fact checkers never want to do that.

How do my blue-pilled friends explain this?

None of my blue-pilled friends will answer me on this. If I ever get an answer, I’ll let you all know.

In the comments, perhaps you can tell us how your blue-pilled friends explain how the signal was ignored? Do they still trust the CDC? Why?

Here’s what one commenter wrote:

My blue pill friends basically say they can’t deal with the implications of the truth, so they’d rather not hear about it or look at it. They live in fear, so I have some compassion about it, but it’s wearing thin.

Here’s the other excuse:

A good portion of my “blue-pilled” friends have never heard of VAERS and will inevitably “circle-back” Jen Psaki style to “Yes, but covid-19 can cause that tooooooooooooooo”, “Yes, but the benefits outweigh the risks” or “Yes, but the unvaccinated are dying at a FAR higher rate and filling our hospitals! I heard it on the news just today!”

It’s hard to argue with people who refuse to look at the data. If they give you the story about so what, the vaccine is safer, ask them to explain to you how in 9 different studies that the more you vaccinate, the higher the infection and fatality rates (see the Vaccine Efficacy section in Incriminating Evidence).

Also, I’d love to know why we even need a vaccine when the Fareed-Tyson early treatment protocol has no deaths and only a few hospitalizations in over 10,000 cases. Why not just use that? Surely, there must be a good reason. What is it? The government should just mandate early treatment if you get COVID. Simple.

Furthermore, our mitigation strategies (the vaccine, the regimented hospital protocol of ventilator and remdesivir, etc.) have done more to kill people than the virus has.

Mike Yeadon, former Pfizer executive, tried to warn them, but it fell on deaf ears

It’s not just mean of course who has been raising the alarm bells.

From the comments from Mike Yeadon, a former top Pfizer executive:

Before any c19 “vaccine” received regulatory authorisation, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I wrote a lengthy petition to the European Medicines Agency, pleading with them not to authorise.

By March 2021, a group called Doctors4CovidEthics had formed & I drafted our first open letter with Sucharit Bhakdi & others, this time majoring on thromboembolic events after “vaccination”.

We were ignored, smeared & ignored.

I warned as many people as I could, but there was no stopping most.

JP Sears has an explanation for how the CDC and FDA can ignore the safety signals

There is one explanation that does make sense to me as to how the CDC and FDA can miss these safety signals (and why the mainstream press, mainstream medical community, Congress, and world leaders missed it as well).

My attempts to meet with my member of Congress, Anna Eshoo

I can’t even meet with my member of Congress (Anna Eshoo) because she refuses my meeting requests and her staff ignores all my emails. They all just don’t want to talk about it. I don’t blame them.

I learned that Congresswoman Eshoo is driven by two things: what the CDC says and what the constituents in her district want. Truth and evidence don’t matter.

Since the majority of people think the vaccines are safe and effective, whatever I say will be ignored. So until I can red-pill a majority of people, nothing happens. Simple.

What is the reaction of the mainstream medical community about this?

They should be outraged they were misled.

But no. They are silent.

Don’t want to risk any NIH funding.


If you want clear, compelling evidence of corruption at the CDC and FDA, here it is.

The CDC knew these vaccines were unsafe in January. They cause clotting everywhere. Pulmonary embolism is just a canary in the coal mine for blood clots. I could have picked something else.

It is troubling that the FDA and CDC didn’t spot this signal. It is huge and in plain sight. Even today, they still don’t acknowledge that the risk of pulmonary embolism is elevated. And if they aren’t talking about that, it means they aren’t talking about any of the thousands of other safety signals in VAERS either.

If you wanted proof of corruption and proof that we cannot trust the authorities, this is it in black and white. It doesn’t get any more obvious than this.

There is simply no way to explain how the CDC and FDA refused to tell people about it when they knew it was happening. And they can’t say they didn’t see it since it was so obvious. If they say they never saw it, they are incompetent.

Now you know why nobody wants to talk to me. The mainstream press will never report on this. Congress will never have an investigation into this until Senator Ron Johnson is back in the majority in the Senate.

No Democratic member of Congress will return any of my calls.

I guess they think if they avoid the issue people will forget about all the people who have died or were permanently injured. And the mandates to get vaccinated (and wear masks) will continue until everyone is fully vaccinated and fully boosted.

Pfizer just asked the FDA for permission for dose #4. There is nothing we can do to stop this because nobody with any authority who is empowered to make a change will listen or look at the facts. It will all be rubber-stamped as before. Facts don’t matter.


  1. Crimes against humanity. Any money accrued from supporting the “vaccine” rollout should be stripped from those who have profited and benefitted from the huge marketing budget. Then hang them all.



  2. Just as Guy Hatchard asked some simple questions I put up on HYS
    …. “When did the New Zealand government first receive the Pfizer Adverse effects report completed on 30th April 2021?”
    …. Considering the volume of adverse events and deaths following mRNA vaccination reported by Pfizer, why did you continue to tell the New Zealand public it was completely safe? …..

    Good on Steve Kirsch for continuing to raise questions, even if the officials keep on covering up, & Pfizer pushing for the 4th vaccine shot in the USA,
    There is more in the full article. + further comments

    1 of the comments.
    “You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
    To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”

    – R. Buckminster Fuller

    As Kirsch says, one will have to wait, when maybe with a Republican Majority in the mid-term elections that cleans out RINO’s;— then Ron Johnson may get an official Senate Inquiry, that then pushes to a “Grand Jury”! in the USA.



  3. And just this morning on the RNZ News 9 am bulletin we were told once again the Ivermectin is Horse Paste and that a big study in the USA has just reported that it is no more effective than a placebo as a treatment for covid.

    I couldn’t believe muh own ears!



    • Mind you, in all fairness, the ivermectin item could have been some kind of editorial stuff-up.

      I say that, because in one of the RNZ bulletins this morning (may have been the same one) the announcer stated “And thats The News.” And then immediately followed with three or four further items in the same bulletin . . . !

      Even so, if it was an editorial stuff-up, I didn’t hear any apology in subsequent bulletins – though if there was an apology, I may have missed it.



    • MBS42 :—- I heard it too.
      That part starts at 2 mins 23 secs

      I even tried to find it and found Reuters Fact Checkers, in reading behind the lines.
      For me in their convoluting ways damm themselves.
      Not peer reviewed, and that study itself seems to be a disaster.

      How RNZ came to use it, makes one wonder about the motive and government PR to try and hold on to “mandates” and their PR change of booster to being “fully vaxxed” by updating constantly regularly vaxxing.

      I wonder why NZ is not doing its own trials with Ivermectin, and or HCQ according to protocols as advised by a number of Doctors.
      Is this news a sort of pressures to keep on leaky vaxxing?

      I believe that RNZ & government are trying to damm this study.

      Ivermectin use was associated with decreased mortality in patients with COVID-19 compared to remdesivir.
      To our knowledge, this is the largest association study of patients with COVID-19, mortality and ivermectin.
      Further double-blinded placebo-controlled RCTs with large samples are required for definite conclusion.
      In the future, if more publications are published with the similar result to the current analyses, the certainty of evidence will increase.


      Anything to keep on the vaxx roll out going, and probably trying to get to some form of flue vaxx for NZ’s winter.
      The main reason is to tie in with the UN Pandemic Treaty which is underway right now to launch a global health passport which will become binding on all travellers. 🙁



Recent posts

largest land predator in Europe

Dinosaurs discovered on the Isle of Wight may have been the largest land predator in Europe A dinosaur unearthed on the Isle of Wight may...

Tell Your Stupid Greenie Mates

Plant-based meats are less nutritious than the real thing, study reveals Plant-based meats don’t pack the same protein punch, making them less nutritious than the...

Recent comments

waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Odakyu-sen on Have Your Say
Ross12 on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Rachael Membery on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

overcast clouds
10.3 ° C
11.7 °
10.1 °
99 %
100 %
10 °
15 °
14 °
12 °
13 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar