HomeFreedom of SpeechUK Free Speech Under Attack

UK Free Speech Under Attack




UK: Jewish conservative’s door broken down, he is handcuffed and jailed on suspicion of “Islamophobia”

On Tuesday the 22nd October, at approximately 07:15, whilst I was getting my four year old child ready for school, there was a rather aggressive knock at my front door. I opened the door and found a whole bunch of police officers who wanted me to come out and ‘talk to them’. Knowing what the modern day British police are like in too many cases, which is thuggish and dishonest, I shut the door in their faces. The police do not turn up mob handed merely to have ‘a chat’. Instead I picked up the handset for my entryphone, which is remotely recorded, and spoke to the officer’s via that method.

I politely requested that they state the reason why they were at my front door and they said ‘we just want to talk’ and ‘you must come outside to speak’. They refused my request that I would speak to them via the window and insisted that I come out. Whilst this was going on I was watching what was happening on CCTV, the footage of which is now secured off site. I could see at least six police officers swarming around my front garden and to my back garden to which they had gained access. There were I observed, four officers in the front and two in the back.

The officer who appeared to be leading this mob of officers, kept saying ‘we want you to come outside so we can talk to you’. Of course I refused. This is because I know from other cases of a similar nature where the police have said this that this is a ruse to gain entry to a property so that they can later say that the occupier ‘invited’ them in. The lead officer, whom I later found out was PC Choudhury of Sidcup who is attached to Sadiq Khan’s ‘hate crime and hate speech’ unit, became ever more threatening and aggressive in his tone and refused to state exactly why he and the rest of the officers were there. He and the other officers kept shouting through the door that if I did not open the door then they would break it down. Because I did not want my son exposed to what the police were obviously going to do I sent him upstairs with my wife.

After about five minutes or so of these officers banging on the front door and issuing threats to break it down and officers menacingly patrolling my back garden, an officer, who at this point I cannot positively identify, brought up what looked like a battering ram. The officers were shouting through the door ‘we are going to break the door down now’.

As the officers said they would, they smashed the lock on my front door causing approximately £100 worth of damage. At least three officers, one of whom was PC Choudhury, rushed into the house and into the kitchen at the back of the house. PC Choudhury then cautioned me, arrested me for ‘Malicious communication and racial and religious hatred’ and put me in handcuffs. They guided me out into the front garden where they searched me and then put me in the back of a police van and took me to the local police station. Whilst I was being searched in the front garden my son escaped from his Mum and ran downstairs to the front door and say his daddy being searched and taken away by police. If I recall correctly I turned to my son and said to him ‘don’t worry, it will be all right, daddy loves you’. He’s been asking me ‘are the policemen going to come back again?’ I will never forgive or forget the trauma that these officers put my child through.

Before I was put in the police van I noticed that a considerable amount of police resources had been put into this arrest and there were at least two police cars present along with the van. I found out later that PC Choudhury and his Met Police civilian assistant, had traveled up the night before, distance of 150 miles and had stayed, at the taxpayers expense, in one of my city’s poshest hotels at a roughly estimated cost including meals of at least £150 per night. It’s good to know that Sadiq Khan’s ‘hate crime and hate speech’ unit is spending Londoners’ money so sensibly isn’t it? Maybe the Met has run out of real crime? Do I need a sarcasm sign here, no I don’t think so.

The police then searched my property and took away all my IT equipment including phones in order to examine them to see if they were related to the ‘offence’ that I had been arrested for. They also took my wife’s computer which is more than little annoying as she needs this machine for her work.

When we got to the police station I was booked in under the catch all and increasingly misused ‘malicious communication and racial and religious hatred’ acts, searched again and put in a cell. The custody sergeant, who incidentally said that I was one of the most polite detainees he had had in a long time, furnished me with paper copies of my rights whilst detained and a requested copy of the Bible, which I used in the cell to meditate upon Psalm 35, a psalm that was appropriate for this situation. I was removed from the cell, photographed, fingerprinted and had DNA taken. I was put back in the cell to await questioning and the arrival of the duty solicitor.

Before questioning by PC Choudhury I consulted with the duty solicitor, who luckily turned out to be far better than many who perform this function, and I told him that I was not going to answer any questions that the police put to me, as is my right. I also gave the police a written statement that I was merely exercising my right to speak freely. I was offered food but I refused on the grounds that the food is unlikely to be Kosher but I was offered and accepted hot drinks as there’s not much you can do to instant coffee that would make this item not Kosher, or Treyf.

Eventually I was brought, along with my solicitor, to an interview room for questioning under caution. I gave the officer my pre-prepared statement about speaking freely and the interview commenced. Of course I answered nearly all questions with ‘no comment’ and refused also to identify the vast majority of the items that the police alleged that they had removed from my home. The police also claimed that they had in possession written correspondence that they believed was between me and others who have challenged both Islam and ‘hate speech’ laws and certain organizations.

Although I did not answer any questions, the questions themselves gave me an inkling into what the arrest was all about. From what I could gather both Mr Mughal, who is the founder of the Tell Mama organisation and London’s Mayor Sadiq Khan had complained about memes mocking them that the police allege they saw on the Fahrenheit211 website. They also asked me about an allegation made by Mr Mughal that I questioned the narrative surrounding the ‘punish a Muslim day’ case in which doubt was cast on the idea that this was the work of an organised group and rather, as it turned out, the work of a lone and deranged nutcase. The police asked me if I was an ‘Islamophobe’ to which I replied ‘no comment’. They also asked me to disclose my passcodes for the machines that they claimed they had seized to which I replied ‘no comment’

Incidentally, if you want further information about some of the criticisms that have been levelled against the Tell Mama organisation and those involved in it along with the sad state of freedom of speech in the UK, then I can highly recommend that you read Nick Monroe’s article ‘Escape from Big Mother” It is an article that makes for illuminating and indeed frightening reading, especially for those who live in nations that, unlike the UK, have a greater respect for freedom of speech and freedom of expression. It should encourage those in places like the USA to hold on tight to their First Amendment, because without it the average citizen may suddenly find that there are a whole load of subjects that they may wish to discuss that are now ‘forbidden’.

I got the distinct impression that the police were trying to get me to make their job of prosecuting me for ‘hate speech’ easy by having me answer questions. This, knowing the parlous state of UK police forces, was not something that I was prepared to do. Basically, the Met are trying to prosecute me for memes and for criticism of those groups who are in receipt of vast amounts of public money, resources to which I and others do not consider them entitled to have.

After discovering that I was not going to answer any of the police’s questions, I was released at present without charge on unconditional bail pending investigation. I suspect that this case will go the way of many other similar cases of ‘malicious communication’ and ‘hate speech’ where the long drawn out process of investigation is the punishment or part of the punishment and also a way of intimidating those who engage in ‘wrongthink’.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the many people who have contacted me both privately and publicly to offer their support and those associates who have contacted various online ‘influencers’ in order to gain publicity not just for my case but also to support the cause of free speech in general. I have been truly heartened by those who have voiced their support and especially to those in the United States who are encouraging a letter writing campaign aimed at the British Embassy in Washington DC. I would also like to thank those (you know who you are) who have given me facilities to work ‘off site’ which is why I’m able to continue writing.

This case is likely to run and run, a bit like the West End play ‘The Mousetrap’, although hopefully not as long as that particular production. I have also been questioned by another government entity that has the misfortune to share initials with a security organisation that was operating in Germany between 1933 and 1945. This I believe is standard practise when a person who is arrested has children. But I have told this organisation the truth. That is that I am a centre rightist Jewish conservative who believes in equality between races, equality between men and women between different sexualities, along with civic nationalism, British values and who is not a member of any extreme party or political grouping. The last party that I was a member of was the Conservative Party who in no way could be called ‘extreme’ by any reasonable person.

This incident will not discourage me from standing up not just for the idea of freedom of speech, which includes freedom of speech for those with whom I vehemently disagree. I am also not discouraged in my view that ‘hate speech’ legislation has no place in a society that considers itself to be free as not only do ‘hate speech’ laws have a chilling effect on a citizen or subject’s speech, but also because they create a two tier system where one group is given virtually carte blanche to say what they want but others do not have this right. If I’m not fighting here, I will be fighting this fight elsewhere and I would encourage others to peacefully and politely protest against both the removal of free speech rights for Britons, but also the damaging and all too easily abused categories of ‘hate speech’ and ‘hate crime’ legislation. In these matters we should be treated as equals no matter what our skin colour or belief system, something that the plethora of ‘hate crime’ legislation does not do. I’m going to fight this case as hard as I possibly can, as it’s not just my fight, but the same fight as everyone who wants freedom of speech and the repeal of the increasingly hated ‘hate speech’ and ‘hate crime’ laws.

Previous article
Next article


  1. That is terrible.
    And its just another reason why we should not let any more muslims into New Zealand.
    Their religion causes hate in both directions.
    No other religion does this.
    And as most of us know islam is more than a religion its a way of life and a law system.



    • Watch the video I just posted a link to. It will be coming here, make no mistake. The failure of the gun ban / confiscation will be the pretext and the start of a whole lot more police thuggishness and repression as government enforcers.



  2. This is the world people like Ardern, Shaw, Peters and to a lesser degree Bridges want. Control. Power.

    It really is time to drain that swamp and change direction for our country.

    None of those troughing control freaks should be in government.



    • Already we have the Professor Paul Hunt, Chief Human Right Commissioner, that pursues the breaking down of legal rights for the newer version of Human Rights, all under terms of modernizing, adapting to new ways, etc.. the soft sell. 🙁

      That removes sovereignty in favour of the supposedly of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, a “bait & switch” that overflows and is operated by many that are signed up to the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights.
      So the bottom line controlling aspect of the CDHR is subtly put into effect with a change of word, change of definition , a clause put in, or removed, yet never acknowledged, so that it can be more easily debated and stopped.



  3. First key learning for me after reading this and some of the linked article, is that we must never allow any government to use the law to punish speech or expression.

    Second learning is that importing Police staff from another country, and at present particularly the UK, may not be a good idea without deep vetting of their attitudes to community and reasons for leaving that other country.

    We do not need any of the police actions, or law that enabled them, as set out in the post, to ever be allowable in this country.

    The piece gives a warning about letting the planned infiltration of an ideology become an increasingly acceptable thing to the point laws are created around it. We need to be wary; we are not immune and have examples generating increasing concern that should not be ignored.



    • I think we should be more concerned about the ideological leanings of any appointees to police senior hierarchy. What justification can the NZP have for sending armed police to the house of law abiding citizens to question them on their political leanings?



  4. I politely requested that they state the reason why they were at my front door and they said ‘we just want to talk’ and ‘you must come outside to speak’. They refused my request that I would speak to them via the window and insisted that I come out. …….
    ……. refused to state exactly why he and the rest of the officers were there. He and the other officers kept shouting through the door that if I did not open the door then they would break it down. …..
    …… noticed that a considerable amount of police resources had been put into this arrest and there were at least two police cars present along with the van. I found out later that PC Choudhury and his Met Police civilian assistant, had traveled up the night before, distance of 150 miles and had stayed, at the taxpayers expense, in one of my city’s poshest hotels

    So no warrant ! ! !
    Certainly the senior police would have known they had no legal authorization or were stretching & twisting some immediacy of demand, when hypocritically they had so much time to organize the “raid”.
    Some of the rest the police would also have figured their actions would have required a warrant !
    Those police have became a wolf pack, and believe they do not have to answer to the correct authorities, though I also figure that many of those authorities have sold their souls, too.

    A reasonable size planned contingent, taking over a day in its operation, before the “take down” and so why “No Warrant”? ? ?

    Those police seem to figure that the judiciary will support them, and will ratify everything they have done.
    A “duty solicitor” will not suffice and I hope enough financial support will happen so a well skilled barrister that is paid enough to allow the time to pursue this case.

    The sad thing is that the changes in by Parliamentary laws, probably has allowed a subversion of reasons and so the judiciary comply.
    But a warrant will make those points stick out like dog balls, so that a push back like ACT’s Seymour is doing like against abusive and insulting, which comes from the “koranic” text book.



  5. The Police actions were similar to their actions against Tommy Robinson and look where he ended up. Obviously not a one off situation but how many others who are not as well situated to set out the facts so eloquently have also been “visited”



  6. A post is up on the “arrest” and some further take by the defendant.
    The “First video” of the cops arriving, then breaking the door.
    from 50 secs, to 3 min 12 secs
    After 3 min 47 it goes complete blank.
    Would you open the door to this rag tag group, loitering at your door?
    In that moment it also shows the intent.

    Plus further videos, but I have not time not check out.
    Interesting blog.



  7. Another attempt to bind a citizen, the current Briish, Prime MInister this time.

    ~Brussels spent £109,000 on report that claimed Johnson is Islamophobic figure
    ~Put Prime Minister alongside English Defence League’s Tommy Robinson
    ~European Islamophobia Report 2018 was published by SETA Foundation
    …… study to a think-tank in Turkey, even though the country is outside the EU. …
    ….. linked to Turkish President Erdogan’s Islamist government. …..

    So what is the next step after the report, “tell mama”? Call the police?

    Johnson and Farage, get your act together for the election. as in the wings, “Letter Boxes” seek their revenge in slow delivery. 🙂
    Firm up on the Brexit delivery.

    Just waiting now for Johnson’s retorts. 🙂 and add a few more votes.



  8. A jump to Canada, but still looking to control the citizen’s free speech, under the right or wrong concept, and even knowingly or unknowingly.

    Section 91 of the Canada Elections Act, which came into effect on September 11, threatens prison terms of up to five years and fines up to $50,000 for disseminating false information about “a candidate, a prospective candidate, the leader of a political party or a public figure associated with a political party.”

    Though an earlier version of the law required that the person charged be aware that the statement is false, the final version removed the word “knowingly” — and allows a charge to be laid even in a case of someone sharing a statement they believe to be true.

    Knowingly or unknowingly still bad law.
    But they are such kind reasonable enforcers. 🙁 yeah right.

    the body responsible for enforcement, it did not intend to pursue cases against those who did not know they were stating or repeating false information.

    So that is for now, until it suits to be more controlling, and shut down discussion and debate.



  9. Cry me a bloody river. This nonsense started with the imaginary condition known as “anti Semitic” rabidly promoted to this day by Jewish extremist groups.

    In addition you are dragged off to prison if you don’t agree to lie about history.



Recent posts

Have Your Say

NudeNut Does It Again !!

Have Your Say

Recent comments

wiseowl on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Braybots nemesis on Have Your Say
Braybots nemesis on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
overcast clouds
16.5 ° C
16.9 °
16.1 °
94 %
100 %
17 °
18 °
20 °
19 °
18 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar