HomeHuman StupidityWho Are The "Experts"?

Who Are The “Experts”?




Don’t Assume that Experts Know Something You Do Not

It’s about brains, really.

People who consider themselves public health experts, and no doubt those who consider themselves climate change experts, don’t consider other people’s brains as being on a par with theirs. That opens a wide door to those who consider themselves experts. If you are an “expert” and have a superior brain, there is no reason to have any compunction about inserting your decision-making into the lives of others – the benighted lessers – and seizing the rights of others, including the foundational rights to decide for oneself what is best for you and to express those decisions openly.

Weirdly, we’ve lived through about three years of a lot of people agreeing with the “experts.” That is, the message back to the “experts” is essentially “You’re right. Our brains are not up to the level of yours, so we will happily allow you to make all decisions for us. We willingly submit.” It’s been the human equivalent of that skinny glass-bodied bird with the top hat who just nods, occasionally dipping its beak into the water in the glass. It nods all day, it nods all night, and it just keeps nodding.

Part of that acquiescence can be attributed to a constant drumbeat suggesting this group of “experts” actually knows the truth, “the science.” Wrap unwavering arrogance (openly backed by members of the same acceptably-educated in-group projecting their own self-anointing, in-group-bonding arrogance into the issue) with a heavy blanket of “You’re going to die if you don’t listen,” and it’s understandable that normal people are cowed.

Still, it’s about brains.

An analogy I landed on to illustrate some of what bothers me in all this is the picture of computer systems that link computers through servers to create supercomputers. We all use computer systems that link computers through servers to create supercomputers. Think about search engines. Those search engines that answer your question in 0.0056 seconds do that through combined processing ability on server farms. In my state, some of those server farms are located near Columbia River dams, maybe to take advantage of unlimited power.

Why don’t we apply the same computer-server-linking thought process to come up with a crude measure for human information processing? After all, many if not most tangible devices that have improved life for humans have had more than one parent involved. The Wright brothers were the first to demonstrate powered flight and they deserve every bit of credit for that. They were, however, not the inventors of the aileron that makes modern flight possible. Their wing-warping worked for the Wright Flyer. Maybe not so much for a 747.

Some human brains combined with some other human brains (and a lot of persistence, experimentation, and hard work) and voila! we have flight as we know it. Add in a lot more human brains cooperating and the 747 becomes feasible.

It’s more than a little like you accessing Google’s server farm from your computer. However, in the vast majority of cases, production of tangible inventions involves a good deal more personal contact between cooperating individuals than does accessing Google.

That brings up another problem thrust upon us from the current crop of arrogant “experts:” we’re not supposed to talk up close and personal with each other. We’re not supposed to travel to talk with each other. Could that be because we might combine our thought processes and learn something uncomfortable to or about the “experts?” It certainly puts innovation at risk.

Back to the computer-server logic: some time ago I developed some numbers to crudely judge human ability to process information using a combined, or maybe additive, brain-power-processor paradigm. At the time I originally did these calculations, the US was somewhat smaller, but the proportions have changed only to make the point stronger, and these numbers are easy to follow.


The goal of the exercise is to analyze the brain-power of the “experts.” Unfortunately for our calculations, but probably fortunate for humanity, an Experts R Us registry doesn’t exist that could be accessed to evaluate the “experts” perhaps more accurately. Therefore, a proxy group is necessary. My chosen proxy is holders of a PhD degree.

PhDs have the top academic degree most disciplines offer. In the following calculations I mean no disrespect to any individual holding a PhD. (Given a little time I’m sure I could come up with a list of PhDs I actively disrespect, but that’s probably my personal issue and doesn’t mean I disrespect the degree as such.) Nonetheless, I will use the PhDs as a surrogate for the self-anointed self-appointed elitist “experts” who project their control on us.

Using the computer-server search engines a few years ago, I learned the US population was 304 million people. At the same time, the US contained a little over 5 million PhDs (5,107,200). If we remove the roughly 5 million PhDs from the 304 million full population, that leaves roughly 299 million regular old folks in the US at that time. The 299 million don’t have PhDs, but they may have professional degrees, Masters degrees, Bachelors degrees, a high school diploma, a GED (General Educational Development) certificate, a journeyman standing, an apprenticeship, or no degree at all. That’s 299 million of a mixed bag, including a group with disabilities and too many MPHs.

Following the computer-server example, and since we respect the PhD degree as the top of the academic heap, we will assign all 5 million PhDs in the US an IQ of a perfect 200. Even most PhDs would consider that absurd, but let’s be generous.

Now we will wire together those 5 million perfect 200 IQ PhD brains into a human server farm. The cumulative IQ represented is 1 billion (a little over since there were a little more than 5 million PhDs).

Next is the same calculation for the benighted masses of IQ-deprived, barely functional people who somehow pass as normal, but only normal in comparison to each other, not normal in comparison to the “experts.”

Since the benighted masses are only normal in intelligence – only average – they/we will be assigned the average IQ of 100. That means, if we beleaguered only-normals attach ourselves together as a human server-farm, we have a total IQ of 29.9 billion. Billion with a B. That is 29.9 times the cumulative calculation power of the nation’s PhDs (again, a proxy for the “experts”).

Looking at that from another direction, the IQ required across the population of the benighted masses to match the cumulative IQ of the nation’s defined-as-IQ-perfect PhDs is a little over 3.4. Three point four, not thirty-four. In other words, if the normal people in the country have the average IQ of cabbage, we can match the combined calculation power of the country’s IQ-perfect PhDs – “the experts.”

That also means that if we raise our average IQs from cabbage to… say, a salamander, we far outstrip the cumulative IQ of the nation’s “experts.”

Does that mean anything in the real world? It only means this: The “expert” class is nothing special in intelligence. If anything this is a clarion call to the general masses of the US to stop assuming the “experts” know something. You can use the same search engines as they do to learn facts, and together we far, far outstrip the intelligence of all the experts put together. We should not be intimidated, but rather we should be outraged that this minor clique of primarily arrogant versus extra-smart people has demanded, with the active assistance of government, to be surrogate decision-makers for normal people.

It’s hard, though, not to be impressed with their highly developed form of condescension. Very close to being an art form.

As Richard Feynman (1965 Nobel in Physics) wrote, “Science is the Belief in the Ignorance of the Experts.” Time to follow Feynman. Forget following arrogant clowns defining themselves as “the science.”

If the past years have taught me anything, it has destroyed any faith I have in believing anything a so-called “EXPERT” says. Not that I was one who blindly took everything I was told as being right.

A healthy dose of skepticism got me where I am today.

Previous article
Next article


  1. Curmudgeons, Cantankerous, seem to be another form of “racism”, “denier”, that is dished out to people who do not agree with the flow of the experts.
    Particularly those experts that have become “panjandrums” when challenged and being xenacious.

    “Please explain” was the simple challenge by Australian Pauline Hanson MP.
    Just love her tenacious points and perseverance.

    And now the great cartoon series of videos too.

    I may not agree with everything Pauline is about, but she gets & needles others, & those experts to to show-up & expose what they based on, so with further info, we & others can push back.

    At least they have some that seem to speak out from the people’s position in the Australian Parliament.



  2. Agreed nasska.
    keeps governments nervous

    First seeded by GroundSwell to more than a hint of that in the Convoy to Wellington Protest last year.
    A lot more work to be done as the techno-bureaucrats are in full flight, using the religions of Transgenderism, Climate Change Emergency, & the WHO Pandemic Treaty. UNDRIP, etc..
    Actually all of the WEF-UN Sustainable Development Goals which is where New Zealand signed up to Agenda 2030.

    Alan Moore — ‘People shouldn’t be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people.’

    : “When government fears the people, there is liberty.
    When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”
    Where one can note the strongest reason for supporting, & recognizing where the NZ government is trying to cinch tighter its powers & more controls. 🙂

    The media have become a total department/agency of the government by beating up the people to keep them afraid.
    Endorsed by the academia experts.
    So no surprise that there is a reciprocation by the people.



  3. 400 Million paid by big pharma to government
    It is and was just a sea of cash to politicians, “health experts”, media the single source of truth.
    I remember a contract to a leading epidemiologist of over 30 Million.
    She is now dead at seventy, can’t wait to see her estate settled, it will be ground breaking.
    Money and graft has been around for centuries, but bribing individuals to deliberately get them to take experimental drugs even though they have been already damaged health wise.
    These people are satanic.
    link to Rand ripping Moderna apart.



  4. What was the date when covid 19 came into existence? My guess is pre 2017.
    Why did the world exchange millions of PCR tests for years before they had a virus they started testing against?
    Why did NZ import PCR value $73,293,000 weighing over 5 tonnes of from no less than 21 countries in 2017?
    Why did NZ export $995,000 weighing 8.4 tonnes same code to 16 countries?
    Figures are from World Bank in $US New Zealand and the world, these are Code 300215, Covid 19 PCR testing diagnostic reagents, didn’t trade in 2016, magically appeared in 2017 and ramped up from there
    link imports NZ 2017
    world bank page for everything covid 19 in 2022



Recent posts

Recent comments

jack nohi on Have Your Say
howitis on Have Your Say
Sooty on Have Your Say
Curious on Have Your Say
Tauhei Notts on Have Your Say
Curious on Have Your Say
freethinker on Have Your Say
freethinker on Have Your Say

Pike is our weekly review of the most popular posts and comments seen on YSB in the past week.
overcast clouds
10.6 ° C
13 °
10.6 °
92 %
85 %
12 °
15 °
11 °
14 °
13 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar