Home Climate Change Bullshit Woke Greenie Supporters Need To Know This

Woke Greenie Supporters Need To Know This

Author

Date

Category

Got to look good, Never mind the environment

The fashion industry emits more carbon than international flights and maritime shipping combined.

Some parts of modern life are, at this point, widely known to cause environmental harm – flying overseas, using disposable plastic items, and even driving to and from work, for example. But when it comes to our clothes, the impacts are less obvious.

As consumers worldwide buy more clothes, the growing market for cheap items and new styles is taking a toll on the environment. On average, people bought 60% more garments in 2014 than they did in 2000. Fashion production makes up 10% of humanity’s carbon emissions, dries up water sources, and pollutes rivers and streams.

What’s more, 85% of all textiles go to the dump each year. And washing some types of clothes sends thousands of bits of plastic into the ocean.

Here are the most significant impacts fast fashion has on the planet.

Clothing production has roughly doubled since 2000.
While people bought 60% more garments in 2014 than in 2000, they only kept the clothes for half as long.
In Europe, fashion companies went from an average offering of two collections per year in 2000 to five in 2011.
Some brands offer even more. Zara puts out 24 collections per year, while H&M offers between 12 and 16.
A lot of this clothing ends up in the dump. The equivalent of one garbage truck full of clothes is burned or dumped in a landfill every second.
In total, up to 85% of textiles go into landfills each year. That’s enough to fill the Sydney harbour annually.
Washing clothes, meanwhile, releases 500,000 tons of microfibers into the ocean each year — the equivalent of 50 billion plastic bottles.
Many of those fibres are polyester, a plastic found in an estimated 60% of garments. Producing polyester releases two to three times more carbon emissions than cotton, and polyester does not break down in the ocean.
A 2017 report from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) estimated that 35% of all microplastics — very small pieces of plastic that never biodegrade — in the ocean came from the laundering of synthetic textiles like polyester.
Overall, microplastics are estimated to compose up to 31% of plastic pollution in the ocean.
The fashion industry is responsible for 10% of humanity’s carbon emissions. That’s more emissions than all international flights and maritime shipping combined.
If the fashion sector continues on its current trajectory, that share of the carbon budget could jump to 26% by 2050, according to a 2017 report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
The fashion industry is also the second-largest consumer of water worldwide. It takes about 700 gallons of water to produce one cotton shirt. That’s enough water for one person to drink at least eight cups per day for three-and-a-half years. It takes about 2,000 gallons of water to produce a pair of jeans. That’s more than enough for one person to drink eight cups per day for 10 years. That’s because both the jeans and the shirt are made from a highly water-intensive plant: cotton.
In Uzbekistan, for example, cotton farming used up so much water from the Aral Sea that it dried up after about 50 years. Once one of the world’s four largest lakes, the Aral Sea is now little more than desert and a few small ponds.
Fashion causes water-pollution problems, too. Textile dyeing is the world’s second-largest polluter of water, since the water leftover from the dyeing process is often dumped into ditches, streams, or rivers.
The dyeing process uses enough water to fill 2 million Olympic-sized swimming pools each year.
All in all, the fashion industry is responsible for 20% of all industrial water pollution worldwide.

14 COMMENTS

  1. That’s fascinating…. but not really at all helpful. By quoting how much ‘carbon’ the fashion industry produces, all the article achieves is to further buy into the climate bullshit.

    0

    0

    • I was focusing on the pollution of the oceans. Next time you see anyone collecting plastic off the beaches, or complaining about the oceans and waterways look at the clothes they are wearing.
      All are wearing designer jeans caps etc.

      0

      0

      • It’s irrelevant what clothes they are wearing. You could make exactly the same argument for EVERY facet of human life…. and that’s exactly what the anti-humanity movement is doing, actually.

        Don’t buy into the bullshit. Arguing ANYTHING along ‘carbon’ lines is just feeding their sick delusions.

        0

        0

  2. Forget climate change – we can not keep consuming and breeding at our current rate regardless.

    So who are the people doing this consuming? To find out just walk down the main street of any town and see who the majority of stores are catering to.

    There is one gender that controls about 90% of global consumption.

    0

    0

    • You’re badly mistaken. We CAN keep breeding (and we SHOULD do actually) and we CAN keep consuming at the current rate. Consuming is a result of production and being productive helps the human race in thousands of ways.

      Breeding and consuming is good for humanity. I’m serious. I’m not being sarcastic. The human race has never had it so good as we have it now, so why on earth would we want to stop, if not to destroy our species?

      Sure we should take care to clean up our mess etc and encourage the best and most intelligent to breed…. but this is a different story and it’s a far cry from what you are suggesting.

      0

      0

  3. From a centre part of my comment on HYS, but fits well here.

    Point out all the nano particles of synthetic materials, like nylon carpets, seem to be getting into peoples (toddlers) blood stream. Has Winston Peters kept his promise, regarding woolen carpets?
    https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/94568296/winston-peters-wants-government-departments-to-have-wool-carpets
    Then again a broken promise of not enough government houses. to be carpeted with wool. 🙁

    0

    0

Comments are closed.

Recent posts

Big Tech will be pissed

POTUS Drops the Hammer on Big Tech: ‘It’s Over’ President Trump has dropped the hammer on Big Tech by going all-in to repeal all their...

Whistleblower tells all

Dominion Whistleblower Drops Bombshell Testimony at Michigan Hearing; Democrats Left Speechless A Dominion contract worker left Democrats stunned during explosive testimony at a hearing before...

Will you be vaccinated?

Vaccine Expert: Minor Side Effects Only “Significantly Noticeable” in About 15% of Patients Thankfully none of the side effects last long or are especially...

Recent comments

Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
Artimus Pyle on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
nasska on Have Your Say
Simpleton1 on Have Your Say
waikatogirl on Have Your Say
Kea on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

Hamilton
overcast clouds
16.9 ° C
17.8 °
16.1 °
81 %
6.3kmh
88 %
Sat
17 °
Sun
21 °
Mon
22 °
Tue
25 °
Wed
25 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.4181
EUR
1.7192
AUD
1.0528
CAD
1.1090
GBP
1.9059
JPY
0.0136
CNY
0.2171
INR
0.0192