Home Freedom of Speech YouTube Censorship of "The Science"

YouTube Censorship of “The Science”

Author

Date

Category

‘Anti-Science’ Corbett Report Removed From Youtube

Written by James Corbett

I posted Episode 398 of The Corbett Report podcast, “Science Says,” around 10 PM Japanese Standard Time on Friday, April 9th, 2021, and then went to bed. Sometime shortly after midnight, the main Corbett Report channel was removed from YouTube.

And, just like that, 14 years of work—some 1700+ videos, 569,000+ subscribers and 90 million+ video views—was erased from the digital ether. . . . Well, the GooTube portion of that digital ether, anyway.

Learning about the banning after waking up on Saturday morning, my only thought was, “Well, that took longer than I expected.”

Indeed, it was not surprising in any sense that this was the report that led to GooTube purging my main channel. When you release a video on an account that already has two strikes for information that “contradicts the World Health Organization (WHO) or local health authorities’ medical information about COVID-19” and that video itself contains information calling those very authorities’ pronouncements into question, you better believe the thought that this might be your last YouTube upload crosses your mind when you push that publish button.

Heck, the “offending” podcast even centers around an op-ed comparing COVID skeptics to terrorists and calling for the UN to mount a “counteroffensive” against them. Of course this video was going to be censored.

What’s more, this had been a particularly difficult report to post in the first place. After rendering and uploading to GooTube, the GooTube censorship copyright check flagged the 30-second clip of “Bill Nye Saves the World” embedded in my commentary on The Weaponization of Science and refused to post the video.

In a sense, it’s even more fitting that it was specifically a video about the philosophy of science that ended the channel. Not a documentary about the central banking system. Not an expose of false flag terrorism. Not a hard-hitting report on geopolitics or hidden history. No, a podcast about science that quotes Thomas Kuhn and highlights the growing politicization of science.

I say it’s “fitting” that such a report would be the one to do in the channel not only because I have been exploring this theme over and over in different ways since the very earliest days of The Corbett Report (since at least Episode 006 of the podcast, to be precise), but because in a sense the removal of The Corbett Report’s YouTube channel provides the ironically hilarious answer to a question that I had as a bright-eyed, bushy-tailed and naive undergrad over two decades ago.

You see, as I explained at the beginning of The Weaponization of Science video, I began my university career as an aspiring physics major. But after a semester spent in chemistry labs, applied mathematics courses and physics tutorials, I decided one day that I wanted to take my life in a completely different direction. So I dropped all my science courses for the upcoming semester and replaced them with English courses.

As one of the very, very few scientifically inclined students in the entire English department, I found that I was particularly on guard against all the eye-rollingly ignorant ways that those in the humanities attempted to add gravitas to their arguments by shoehorning inaccurate analogies about poorly understood scientific concepts (like “relativity” and “quantum mechanics”) into their lectures and papers. And so it was that I found myself approaching one professor during his office hours after he made a remark about how science was “politically determined.”

“How can science be politically determined?” I demanded of him indignantly. “If I drop this tape dispenser off your desk it’s going to fall at 9.81 m/s2 regardless of who is in political office.”

My professor, for his part, had only to prompt me to consider the inquisition’s investigation of Galileo for me to realize his point. Yes, scientists can be intimidated into proclaiming whatever the authorities—political, religious or otherwise—tell them to proclaim, even if it goes against their experimental results. The Galileo example may have been a particularly blunt one (and may or may not be apocryphal), but it hit the mark.

I never forgot that lesson. It is part of what has informed my work on the various pseudoscience fads, trends and hoaxes that have been foisted on the masses over the preceding century, from eugenics to Malthusian fearmongering to the catastrophic anthropogenic climate change myth.

Fast forward 20+ years and here I am daring to point out how the neo-inquisitionists are purging all criticism of their pseudoscientific pronouncements and . . . poof. Channel gone. Which kind of proves my point, doesn’t it?

Now, as I do not need to tell my regular audience, none of the videos are actually gone. Every single video has been backed up to LBRY. Years worth of videos are also backed up to BitChute, and, to a lesser extent, Minds and Archive.org.

Every video since 2011 is downloadable directly from my servers. But if you don’t know that by this point, perhaps you’re not really ready to follow The Corbett Report into the Brave New (post-YouTube) Internet. Newsflash: this is 2021. If you’re still using YouTube to get your news, history and political information then you’ve got bigger problems than just the loss of The Corbett Report.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: the “infowar” is not an analogy but a stone cold sober reality, and the fact that The Corbett Report was able to use a major enemy information platform to propagate the truth to the slumbering masses for 14 years is a major victory in and of itself.

So long, GooTube. Thanks for helping me to unlock so many minds. You will not be missed.

Previous articleRemember History
Next articleHave Your Say

4 COMMENTS

    • Yes,, Like a different sense of buffering.

      I have wondered, as Utube gets one spoiled with it’s so many convenient features.
      Perhaps there are patents or similiar so they can not be easily picked up.
      Maybe the protection that some would most likely have, like against “bot swarms” “takedowns” “overloading” make it more difficult.

      It is a problem of what we wish for, but need to be careful too.
      The resources needed for them to be able to upgrade, may be time & money.
      It becomes a “catch 22” for the likes of Bitchute, etc., as more money goes into the system, more administration, then more risk of corruption, that seeks angles and perspectives of eventually taking control.

      You can bet, that many others would take them all down if they can find away.

      I have noticed other blogs, have removed some nice to have amenities, to make them more secure, against attacks on them.

      Still support where I can, as sort of figure, if they are getting the “hits” and so encourage them, and hopefully that allows them to evolve to putting better systems.

      3

      0

Recent posts

More Chinese Virus Bullshit

Dr. Breaks Gag Order & Exposes COVID Vax Deadly Effects   Dr. Charles Hoffe was issued a gag order from the Canadian Interior Health authority after...

More Leftie Stupidity

Welfare lobby groups want money for high energy bills when they help cause them Tim Blair Goofy climate-obsessed big-government types always get everything wrong. And when...

Could This Happen Here?

Rightoverlabour The bit below was sent to me by a mate from South Africa. However, if you replace African with Maori, I'd suggest that it...

Recent comments

BertP on Have Your Say
Private Godfrey on Have Your Say
Braybots nemesis on Have Your Say
Sooty on Have Your Say
Sooty on Have Your Say
Sooty on Have Your Say
Sooty on Have Your Say
Viking on Have Your Say

The way we all feel about this useless government

Hamilton
clear sky
10.1 ° C
11.7 °
8.9 °
95 %
1.9kmh
5 %
Thu
13 °
Fri
19 °
Sat
19 °
Sun
18 °
Mon
21 °
NZD - New Zealand Dollar
USD
1.3899
EUR
1.6751
AUD
1.0760
CAD
1.1361
GBP
1.9303
JPY
0.0127
CNY
0.2147
INR
0.0188