Written by Andy Rowlands
The World Health Organisation‘s International Health Regulations have today become legally binding to any member of the United Nations that did not formally reject them in writing
These insidious regulations give the WHO the power to overrule the governments of the 194 members of the UN, and impose legally binding instructions which, unless that country has specifically rejected them, they must obey.
The purpose of these regulations, according to the WHO themselves, is to strengthen responses to potential future pandemics, in light of the ‘haphazard’ responses to the ‘Covid’ ‘pandemic’, so that every UN-member nation responds in the same way.
It might sound innocuous enough, but the regulations allow the WHO to impose lockdowns, restrictions on freedom of movement, compulsory, though I prefer the word forced, ‘vaccinations’ and vaccine ‘passports’, regardless of whether that member state thinks they are neccessary or not, confering “legislative and executive powers” to the WHO, overriding each member country’s national sovereignty in health matters.
As of yesterday, just six UN-member states had rejected these regulations; Slovakia, New Zealand, Iran, the Netherlands, South Africa and the USA. All the other member states are now legally bound by these regulations, including the UK.
It is especially interesting that New Zealand has rejected these regulations, as that country was actually a founding member of the UN, having joined on June 26, 1945. New Zealand was actively involved in the 1945 United Nations Conference on International Organization in San Francisco, where the UN Charter was drafted.
South Africa rejoined the UN General Assembly as a fully participating member in June 1994, after the end of apartheid. It had previously been suspended from participation due to its apartheid policies.
This is seen by mamny commentators as the latest effort by the globalists to extend their overreach further and further into our lives. The UN has stated for some years it thinks there should be a single government to rule the world, and nominates itself for that role.
What do men with power crave more than anything else? More power.
These ‘health’ regulations would allow the UN to impose open-ended draconian restrictions at the very sniff of anything that could pose a threat to public health or safety, and some astute commentators have already observed this could be used to impose ‘climate lockdowns’ to ‘save the planet’ from the ‘climate emergency’ that never existed.
In reality, these people are like James Bond megalomaniacs, bent on world domination, and by inventing an ‘existential crisis’ like ‘climate change’ and future pandemics that Biden said ARE coming, they get people to give up their rights and freedoms, which allows the gradual imposition of totalitarian dictatorships, where you either obey the state, or are forcibly put into prison, potentially permanently, or disappear one night and are never seen again.
This is the reailty that now confronts the 187 nations that accepted these regulations.
In a surprise move, this very afternoon, Italy also registered their rejection of these new regulations.
100 or more of those countries don’t even recognize the UN so opting out would mean they did. Having to opt out of something is so last century .
It would be like deciding that the three hot blondes that live next door, all have to sleep with you unless they opt out. But they don’t know about it. So it becomes “legally binding”.
Commonly called rape.
We may have something to thank Winston Peters for after all.
For sure none of the other gutless UN arse lickers in parliament would have gone against the flow.